- Oct 30, 2003
- 8,898
- 476
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Married
The UK is not financially viable.
Oh pray tell, why on earth not?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The UK is not financially viable.
A trillion pounds of debt
A trillion pounds of debt
And what/who is responsible for this debt? Where does this money go? What is it spent on?
Let the Scottish alone, and allow them to decide for themselves, it is for the Scottish people to decide.
It is as simple as that. The Scots have a right to choose, it doesn't matter if it affects England at all. Do you think England should have held onto India in 1947?
It is as simple as that. The Scots have a right to choose, it doesn't matter if it affects England at all. Do you think England should have held onto India in 1947?
Well, if they have the right to choose, then they can take their share of the UK debt, they can stop using the Pound Sterling and adopt the dreadful Euro, they can become subservient to Brussels. It does matter if it affects England, we've been paying taxes to them, their MP's have made it hard for English Students to go to University and made it easier for their own, they have a say in everything that affects the English people, so yes, it does affect us and always has done. For them to turn their back on us now, after everything, it's a bit of a kick in the teeth really.
Oh well, if they do get independence, lets see how long they last. Salmond has proven himself to be incompetent. I have faith that the majority of Scottish people have some common sense and choose not to vote for independence, which I believe is what will happen.
Could this actually be a cultural issue, rather than a financial/economic issue from an English point of view ? I mean in a cultural sense ?
Bump...And what/who is responsible for this debt? Where does this money go? What is it spent on?A trillion pounds of debt
And what/who is responsible for this debt? Where does this money go? What is it spent on?
Ah and here was me thinking you might have some insight to share with us. Is Salmond also under the impression that wikipedia is going to compensate for his lack of credibility?
Erm, it's a bit of both really. I guess it could be cultural as I have both Scottish and Northern Irish descent in me, so I don't really want a break up of the Union.
Yes, because:
1) Scotland will leave the UK without it's share of the debt.
2) You can run away from the damage debt does to the global economy.
If only it was that simple.
The Union Jack=the butcher's apron. Get it down off the pole and into the abattoir where it belongs.
I expect the `Scottish` veterans who fought relentlessly for the UK during the conflicts of the 20th and 21st centuries under the banner of the Union flag would disagree with you.
Bish