• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

If Evolution were true...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Insane_Duck

Because ducks are just awesome like that.
May 29, 2011
1,392
22
✟1,763.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Like Saul of Tarsus was, when he changed practically overnight from persecutor to persecuted?

2 Corinthians 11:25 Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned, thrice I suffered shipwreck, a night and a day I have been in the deep;
2 Corinthians 11:26 In journeyings often, in perils of waters, in perils of robbers, in perils by mine own countrymen, in perils by the heathen, in perils in the city, in perils in the wilderness, in perils in the sea, in perils among false brethren;
Do you have any extra-biblical evidence that Paul of Tarsus existed or at the very least did the things you say he did? Because we are debating the truth of the biblical account.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How do you know?
How do I know?

Well -- let's see.

Remember Salman Rushdie? the man that wrote The Satanic Verses?

Didn't the Arab scientists put a $2,000,000.00 bounty on his head for that?

I also vaguely remember something about an episode of the Smithsonians, where there was a knock at the door, and Bart or Homer or whoever answered it, and it was [TVs version of] Jesus Christ; but the writers meant it to be Mohammad, until this Rushdie thing broke out, causing even the mighty Smithsonians to bow to Iran and mock our Saviour, instead of their prophet.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you have any extra-biblical evidence that Paul of Tarsus existed or at the very least did the things you say he did? Because we are debating the truth of the biblical account.
Here we go -- invoking extra-Biblicality.

If I was one of those who believe we should win debates in favor of Christianity in these latter days, I would claim a victory.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yep. Thought it was true. But didn't know it was true.
They weren't NASA engineers who okayed the Challenger, Skaloop; they were simple fishermen, publicans and sinners, just li... nevermind.
 
Upvote 0

FrenchyBearpaw

Take time for granite.
Jun 13, 2011
3,252
79
✟4,283.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
How do I know?

Well -- let's see.

Remember Salman Rushdie? the man that wrote The Satanic Verses?

Didn't the Arab scientists put a $2,000,000.00 bounty on his head for that?

I also vaguely remember something about an episode of the Smithsonians, where there was a knock at the door, and Bart or Homer or whoever answered it, and it was [TVs version of] Jesus Christ; but the writers meant it to be Mohammad, until this Rushdie thing broke out, causing even the mighty Smithsonians to bow to Iran and mock our Saviour, instead of their prophet.
Are you so naive as to believe that just because someone dies for their beliefs, they are by default... true? ^_^
 
Upvote 0

Insane_Duck

Because ducks are just awesome like that.
May 29, 2011
1,392
22
✟1,763.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Here we go -- invoking extra-Biblicality.

If I was one of those who believe we should win debates in favor of Christianity in these latter days, I would claim a victory.
The bible account is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know they existed because of the bible account of them. -> The bible account is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know they existed because of the bible account of them. -> The bible account is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know they existed because of the bible account of them.

If you don't see the problem you... are a typical creationist.
 
Upvote 0

Inan3

Veteran Saint
Jul 22, 2007
3,376
88
West of the Mississippi
✟27,875.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you have any extra-biblical evidence that Paul of Tarsus existed or at the very least did the things you say he did? Because we are debating the truth of the biblical account.

Do you have any extra-scientific evidence that the earth is millions of years old like geologists say it is? Because we are debating the truth of the scientific data.

You know you weren't they to see them actually calculating the data. So you have no idea if these guys actually did calculate it or whether or not they are just trying to get you guys to believe a lie or their "doctrine" of evolution.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,269
52,669
Guam
✟5,159,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Are you so naive as to believe that just because someone dies for their beliefs, they are by default... true? ^_^
Of course not -- I'm talking about people [not] dying for something they knew was false.
 
Upvote 0

Inan3

Veteran Saint
Jul 22, 2007
3,376
88
West of the Mississippi
✟27,875.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The bible account is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know they existed because of the bible account of them. -> The bible account is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know they existed because of the bible account of them. -> The bible account is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know they existed because of the bible account of them.

If you don't see the problem you... are a typical creationist.

The evolution story is not true. -> The people who wrote it don't care if you die for it. -> You say we know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never seen the data. ->

The evolution story is not true. -> The people who wrote it don't care if you die for it. -> You say we know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never seen the data. ->

The evolution story is not true. -> The people who wrote it don't care if you die for it. -> You say we know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never seen the data. ->

The evolution story is not true. -> The people who wrote it don't care if you die for it. -> You say we know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never seen the data. ->

If you don't see their truth you will be discredited and banned and lose your career and your friends.

If you don't see the truth you are really deluded.
 
Upvote 0

Insane_Duck

Because ducks are just awesome like that.
May 29, 2011
1,392
22
✟1,763.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Do you have any extra-scientific evidence that the earth is millions of years old like geologists say it is? Because we are debating the truth of the scientific data.

You know you weren't they to see them actually calculating the data. So you have no idea if these guys actually did calculate it or whether or not they are just trying to get you guys to believe a lie or their "doctrine" of evolution.
:doh:If the evidence for the age of the earth was based on the conclusion that the earth was millions of years old you might have a point.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
The evolution story is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never see the data. ->




If you don't see the truth you are really deluded.

Isn't it just pathetic that the Creationism crowd can't even pull off an "I know you are but what am I?" schtick without bungling it?

If you guys can't even be insulting without screwing it up, how are you going to properly represent the character of your deity?
 
Upvote 0

Insane_Duck

Because ducks are just awesome like that.
May 29, 2011
1,392
22
✟1,763.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
The evolution story is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never see the data. ->

The evolution story is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never see the data. ->

The evolution story is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never see the data. ->

The evolution story is true. -> The people who wrote it were willing to die for it. -> We know it is true because of the pictures and charts they give us. -> They tell us it is true so we believe them even though we have never see the data. ->
1. No one ever claimed it was true because the people who came up with the data they were willing to die for it.
2. The data is readily available.
3. Please don't say that you haven't seen the data. We have shown it to you time and time again and it's not hidden. If you and AV reject the data that's fine for you, but the majority of the educated world accepts it, unlike the "data" for creationism. (Yes creationists can be educated, but they, as a trend are not. And besides, the educated creationists have the remarkable ability to compartmentalize)
If you don't see their truth you will be discredited and banned and lose your career and your friends.
[bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]?

Edit: In the kindest and the most pleasant way possible, you are off your rocker.

If you don't see the truth you are really deluded.
In the case of evolution, if you've seen the evidence and still don't believe it, you may very well be deluded.

Edited to fix grammar among other things.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Here we go -- invoking extra-Biblicality.

If I was one of those who believe we should win debates in favor of Christianity in these latter days, I would claim a victory.

Well, if you could, you mightn't be Great Commission Failing so often.

Of course, resorting to extraBiblicality is not a fail, so you can't even claim victory here....
 
Upvote 0

Inan3

Veteran Saint
Jul 22, 2007
3,376
88
West of the Mississippi
✟27,875.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Isn't it just pathetic that the Creationism crowd can't even pull off an "I know you are but what am I?" schtick without bungling it?

If you guys can't even be insulting without screwing it up, how are you going to properly represent the character of your deity?

I can be insulting but I choose not to because I do represent the character of God Almighty. I don't have peace when I am insulting. I don't need nor want to insult. I just need to tell the sad truth about your situation. You on the other hand have no choice you must represent the character of your deity. And you do it well. he was a ---- and a murderer from the beginning. I suggest you move along and get as far from him as you can because he means you only harm. Nice talking with you, though. Try to keep your :cool:
 
Upvote 0

Insane_Duck

Because ducks are just awesome like that.
May 29, 2011
1,392
22
✟1,763.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
You on the other hand have no choice you must represent the character of your deity. And you do it well. he was a ---- and a murderer from the beginning. I suggest you move along and get as far from him as you can because he means you only harm.
Yahweh?
 
Upvote 0

Davian

fallible
May 30, 2011
14,100
1,181
West Coast of Canada
✟46,103.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
Thank you for your response.
You will note I said science that is contrary to God's Word. I did not say all science.
You are naive if you believe that scientists use a different set of the laws of physics to engineer the hardware and networks that your computer uses to those used by astrophysicists to look billions of years into the past. Finding the petroleum for the plastics and the mining of the ore for the computer chips uses old earth geology methods. Has a bible provided any of that information? Never. The x-ray and MRI machines at the hospital use the same laws of physics, as does the GPS system that you may have in your cell phone. Do own or drive a car? You have already accepted all of those physical laws, and all of the related science.

Davian, Forty years... that's forty years. I've been young and now I'm not so young (in age that is) I've seen lots and lots in my life and been through lots and lots. I am a very open and honest person. I'm that way with God also. I say this because there is no way that I have not already tested God. He allows this because He would know I wasn't being honest if I didn't. Life brings us many things and questions along the way. That's one of the things my Father does. He answers my questions. I have never had a test or a question that I have not gone away from it believing MORE in God than I did before. I'm not afraid of God in ANY way. I LOVE God.
Yet this is in contradiction to your earlier answer. If the only answers you receive are those that appear to come from within, then that is not much of a god. The human brain is an amazing thing, capable of creating its own illusions, such as the illusion of self, as detailed in my posting here.

I don't know how to make you see or understand that over the internet.

Back in the 1600's they were working out the speed of light. The method could be conveyed to someone on the other side of the planet, where they could replicate the experiment for themselves. That is science.

You describe your god as a very big and important thing. Has it never occured to you that the fact that you cannot demonstrate this god to others like myself is that you may be wrong? Why is your god indistinguishable from nothing?

I am ignostic about gods. I do not mean this in a hurtful way, but your god appears to be no more than storybook character in a work of historical fiction.

I'm not religious.
You appear to be very religious.
I'm not just a mamby pamby Christian. I question everything and everyone, including myself, and if it doesn't line up with the scriptures I don't accept it.
So by this you mean you reject computers, automobiles, television, modern medicine?
I don't SEE the Word of God as you do. I don't believe men COULD have written what has been written in the Bible WITHOUT the influence of the Holy Spirit. All these writings were by individuals who lived hundreds and thousands of years apart and they did not conspire with each other to form a doctrine to bring all us Christians under their control.
They are just writings in a book.
God does not work solely under some church building. He works in our individual lives. Yes, there may be some who fit your description but most true or mature Christians do not. When you are a true Christian you do not have to even know the person to know if they are a true Christian. I don't know AV or any of the other Christians here personally. I don't even know what their real names are or where they are from but I am one with them. I know exactly what they mean when they talk about the Bible and Christ. How can that be? I don't know them from Adam and yet, I know them. It's because we are one in the Spirit.... one in the family of God.... onne in Christ.

As to God's presence being measured or detected in some way there is a way but you must be born of the Spirit to experience it. God is a Spirit and to know Him you, too, must be alive in the spirit. You must be alive unto God. When we are born into this world in the physical/natural we are not alive unto God. We have to receive Jesus His Son to become sons and daughters ourselves.... THEN you can know God and His presence. You won't see Him yet, but you can know Him.

This is circular logic, and is dismissed as such. I have to believe in order to believe? Ridiculous. Again, this was written into the 'holy' texts, to stop the 'who's that behind the curtain' questions. Tempt the believers with heaven, threaten the doubters with hell. Your bible has been dismantled in ways never imagined by the writers. Had they any idea the internet was in the future? Apparently not, or I am sure they would have spent more time editing it for continuity. It is just a book.

You told me what you think I believe. Now, let me tell you what I believe. I believe you are afraid to test God. I believe you can't move into the realm of the unseen because YOU are afraid that what you have been taught your whole life or what you have built your beliefs on will be shown to be false. Some of it IS false. You are afraid you will be mocked and ridiculed by possibly your family or friends ... and you just might be... but it's worth it to know the Lord. I think most atheists WANT us to PROVE God and SHOW us God and I wish I could but that is not how it works. YOU have to believe God is real or at least seek Him to find out for yourself. God wants you to KNOW Him. Other Christians are here to help and support you but if ones faith was all based on other Christians.... well, you know how that would go. Christians are not perfect just new creatures growing all the time. If we did not have GOD Christianity really wouldn't be much at all. God is the focus of it all. God is the reality of it all. God is the Life and Spirit of it all.
Then you do not know atheism, and particularly ignostic atheism.

I am no more afraid to test God than I am of testing Darth Vader.

My wife of 20 years was raised Anglican, but only attends church with her parents a few times per year. We take communion (we pass on the wine for sanitary reasons). Interesting, but ultimately it is just an empty tradition to me.
Our kids are free of any theism, and I have talked at length with them on why people want to believe such things (including extraterrestrials, crop circles, perpetual motion machines).

I hope this is the post you were asking me to answer. If not please let me know.

I think it is time for my wife to stop believing. You are one of the first on this board to respond with something other than evasion or obfuscation, but you ended up just preaching. You have provided nothing to substantiate the existence of your god. I had hope for more from a forum such as this one.

To paraphrase from the NMS quote I posted earlier, all I see here are vast and intricate rationales on trying to justify why their particular interpretation of a certain version of a bible shows that it cannot be proven to be false. And nothing to show that they are more than historical fiction.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.