Well, occasionally you guys give something useful in your posts. Thanks for the definition. Although, I am sure MOST people in the REAL world would not have understood or known that this was the actual definition (probably because most people would have no malicious intent like some in knowing or forming the word). I, for one, am very happy to now understand the word because now I can proudly and correctly and FREELY say I am not a "freethinker" as pertaining to this word, nor do I ever want to be!
I can see that it is a "limiting" word and not so "free" after all (as it's very composition would "seem" to express).
The above definition states
"unwilling" to accept "authority" or dogma
"one who forms opinions on the basis of reason INDEPENDENTLY of authority"
and therefore, puts people in a narrow minded and UNWILLING position to learn making them subject to error on every turn.
The composition of the word suggests quite the opposite of it's meaning, though, and thereby, causes people to possibly misuse it. It is made of the words "free" and "thinker."
FREE
1. enjoying personal rights or liberty (the right to NOT be insulted because one believes or thinks differently)
2. pertaining to or reserved for those who enjoy personal liberty (to believe as one wants)
3. existing under, characterized by, or possessing civil and political liberties that are, as a rule, constitutionally guaranteed by representative government (freedom of religion)
THINKER
1. One who devotes much time to thought or meditation.
1. One who thinks or reasons in a certain way
I no longer consider myself a freethinker but I know for sure I am a FREE THINKER. I get to choose what I think and am not subject to the ridicule of those with limited thinking. I don't mind taking or listening to authority and yet I am not bound by what they say alone. I can move away from the error of some science because I am not worried about persecution or ostracism from those who are "unwilling" to think outside the "accepted" box of evolution and it's many errors.
Just because one is UNWILLING to accept authority or dogma does not necessarily show intelligence but can also be a sign of ignorance.