The only reference to this is to
Hibben (1943)
So what there is one spot with an accumulation of bones in an intertidal environment, some of which may or may not have been mammoth bones.
May or may not have been? Unfortunately this is not the only spot in the world nor is Hibben the only person in the world.
Spatial-temporal features of the Pleistocene megafauna extinction in Northern Asia: an overview
Then why were so many species unaffected while the pleistocene megafauna died off?
Some say it is the climate change,
Climate Change Caused Extinction of Big Ice Age Mammals, Scientist SaysGrayson points to climate shifts during the late Pleistocene and related changes in weather and vegetation patterns as the likely culprits in the demise of North America's megafauna.
While others blame man,
Humans to Blame for Ice Age Extinctions, Study SaysSteadman and his colleagues argue that megafauna species on the American continents, having evolved in an environment without humans, may have been particularly vulnerable to the sudden appearance of big game hunters.
But neither has to be fully chosen. The change in climate due to the cataclysm coincides with the migratory patterns and culture fusions as noted earlier. This line sums it up,
Humans to Blame for Ice Age Extinctions, Study SaysClimate change may have been a factor in pushing the animals to extinction, Steadman says, but it took humans to push them over the edge.
The type of migration depicted earlier would in fact promote the rapid depletion and even accelerate it.
Um, Asian elephants are not exinct.
The mammoths in Siberia may be what is being alluded to here.
Bring Back the Elephants - Tools Ideas Environment - Whole Earth CatalogWe are keenly aware that living African ( Loxodonta africana ) and Asian (Elephas maximus ) elephants are not conspecific with fossil mammoths ( Mammuthus) or other native New World Proboscidea. But all are in the same family, and some taxonomists have considered Elephas and Mammuthus to be quite close, even congeneric;
Spatial-temporal features of the Pleistocene megafauna extinction in Northern Asia: an overview
The corpus of 14C dates for several megafaunal species in Siberia include hundreds of values, with largest amount available for woolly mammoth (ca. 580), and less for other species: woolly rhinoceros ca. 45; Pleistocene bison ca. 75; and Pleistocene horse ca. 80.
The pleistocene extinction occured after the receeding of the glaciers not after the coming of the glaciers.
'
It is a two fold effect.
This quick frozen mammoth nonsense was debunked by Farrand 50 years ago
Farrand, William Frozen Mammoths and Modern Geology, Science 133:729-735 (1961)
All the evidence now at hand supports the conclusions of previous workers that no catastrophic event was responsible for the death and preservation of the frozen woolly mammoths.The cadavers are unusual only in that they have been preserved by freezing;the demise of the animals, however, accords with uniformitarian concepts. The ratio of frozen specimens (around 39) to the probable total population (more
than 50,000) is of the order of magnitude expected among terrestrial mammals on the basis of chance burial.Furthermore, the occurrence of nearly whole carcasses is extremely rare (onlyfour have been found), in spite of the numerous expeditions for fossil ivory and other exploration in northern Siberia.
There is no direct evidence that any woolly mammoth froze to death. In fact, the healthy, robust condition of the cadavers and their full stomachs argue against death by slow freezing.On the other hand, the large size of their warm-blooded bodies is not compatible with sudden freezing. In addition,all the frozen specimens were rotten and, in most cases, had been somewhat mutilated by predators prior to freezing.
.
Histological examination of fat and flesh of the Berezovka
mammoth showed "deep penetrating chemical alteration as a result of the very slow decay," and even the frozen ground surrounding a mammoth had the same putrid odor, implying decay before freezing
The above does not address the point being made. For one, we already know that it was rotten.
Ooparts & Ancient High Technology--The Boneyards IVThe evidence of the violence of nature combined with the stench of rotting carcasses was staggering.
The extinction of the woolly mammoth: was it a quick freeze?1. The number of frozen carcasses, in spite of under-reporting, is very small compared to the number of mammoth bones that underwent normal decay and are entombed in the permafrost.
104,
105
2. The carcasses are often partially decayed with fly pupae and display signs of scavenging,
3,
79,
106,
107 not expected during a quick-freeze.
3. The unique condition of several of the carcasses, such as the famished condition of Dima and the headless Selerikhan horse (Figure 5),
3,
83 indicate some time elapsed before final burial.
4. For some of the carcasses, death appears to have occurred at different times of the year.
83,
108 A quick-freeze during the Flood, especially as advocated by some creationists, would have occurred in a single instant.
5. The characteristics of the permafrost that entombs the carcasses and bones, show that it was not dumped quickly from above. It is doubtful that ice wedges would form during a quick drop of ice or hail from above.
The quickness being referred to here is the change in temperature. They were grazers. What is seen does not indicate the type of gradual change where a migration would suffice but instead the onset of a rather sudden change.
The extinction of the woolly mammoth: was it a quick freeze?Carcasses and bones of woolly mammoths in Siberia, Alaska, and the Yukon have been difficult to explain. The mammoth remains are abundant over the mid and high latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere, except in formerly glaciated areas. There are probably millions of them buried in the permafrost of Siberia alone. A wide variety of other mammals, large and small, accompanied the mammoth. Many of these animals are grazers, implying that the paleoenvironment of Beringia was a grassland with a wide diversity of plants. This diversity of plants and animals points to a longer growing season with milder winters and very little permafrost.
This paleoenvironment is contrary to what is observed in Beringia today, with its very cold winters and boggy substrate in summer. Scientists constrained by uniformitarian thinking seem to face conundrum after conundrum in regard to the life and death of the woolly mammoth in Beringia, as well as by the ice age itself. A uniformitarian ice age climate would have been even colder still. It is difficult to conceive that the woolly mammoth and all the other animals could have lived in Siberia under these conditions. It is obvious the uniformitarian assumption does not apply.
Mass extinction: Why did half of N. America's large mammals disappear 40,000 to 10,000 years ago?A particular issue that has also contributed to this debate focuses on the chronology of extinctions. The existing fossil record is incomplete, making it more difficult to tell whether or not the extinctions occurred in a gradual process, or took place as a synchronous event. In addition, it was previously unclear whether species are missing from the terminal Pleistocene because they had already gone extinct or because they simply have not been found yet.
However, new findings from Faith indicate that the extinction is best characterized as a sudden event that took place between 13.8 and 11.4 thousand years ago. Faith's findings support the idea that this mass extinction was due to human overkill, comet impact or other rapid events rather than a slow attrition.
"The massive extinction coincides precisely with human arrival on the continent, abrupt climate change, and a possible extraterrestrial impact event" said Faith. "It remains possible that any one of these or all, contributed to the sudden extinctions. We now have a better understanding of when the extinctions took place and the next step is to figure out why."
Posted by FB:RE Cro-Magnan man
The change is that archeologist started just calling them humans and not cro-magnon. They neither went extinct or migrated
Read the site again. Try for comprehension this time. Paleolithic people continously lived in Europe from 35,000 years ago to the present. Those who lived there from 10,000 years ago to the present are simply not called Cro-Magnan
They are referring to a time period.
Cro-Magnons - Why Don't We Call Them Cro-Magnon Any More?
Cro-Magnon is the informal word once used by scientists to refer to the people who were living alongside
Neanderthals at the end of the last ice age (ca. 35,000-10,000 years ago).
Even if they changed their names, it is still [insert new name] living alongside neanderthals 35000-10000 years ago. Further, an effect on them is recorded.
Cro-Magnon EuropeThe
end of the ice age brought about a change in the European environment which would have affected Cro-Magnon people. Europe became forested, which caused a sharp reduction in the number and size of herds of migratory animals. The number of settlement sites dropped and their size also seems to have been smaller.
It looks like rapid means a few thousand years in this context, not a single catastrophic global flood.
Rapid deglaciation within that period.
You still have presented no evidence for a global flood. We don't know exactly what caused the great die-off of pleistocene megafauna but we do know it was not a global flood.
Irrelevant. You still have not understood the allusion to the global fire.
