- May 19, 2015
- 125,550
- 28,531
- 74
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Let their victims decide how "fair" we should be. Let's consider how they felt.I do not believe that anyone deserves to be burned alive. However, let us bend over backward to be fair to the RCC Church of the Middle Ages. The Church believed that heretics were effectively a cancer on the Body of Christ and that they had to either be forced to recant the error of their ways or to be killed, so that the their cancer of heresy would not spread to others and lead others into eternal damnation. As I understand it, the punishment for heresy was burning at the stake, because this would allow the heretics perhaps a few minutes to see the error of their ways and to make an Act of Perfect Contrition and thus save their souls, if not their lives. Immediately killing them by hanging them or chopping their heads off would not give them a chance to repent at the last minute and save their souls from Hell or so the Church felt.
I do not believe that anyone deserves to be burned alive. However, let us bend over backward to be fair to the RCC Church of the Middle Ages. The Church believed that heretics were effectively a cancer on the Body of Christ and that they had to either be forced to recant the error of their ways or to be killed, so that the their cancer of heresy would not spread to others and lead others into eternal damnation. As I understand it, the punishment for heresy was burning at the stake, because this would allow the heretics perhaps a few minutes to see the error of their ways and to make an Act of Perfect Contrition and thus save their souls, if not their lives. Immediately killing them by hanging them or chopping their heads off would not give them a chance to repent at the last minute and save their souls from Hell or so the Church felt.
Depends on how quick it is and whether the knife is dull or sharp.That's pretty big of them. I'd MUCH rather get fried like chicken instead of a quick death like beheading!
I try to imagine that and for the life of me I can't.Let their victims decide how "fair" we should be. Let's consider how they felt.
And that is precisely where the Church of the Middle Ages, and a bit earlier went into error. Per the Apostles, the heretics "went out from us" precisely because "they were not of us". Those outside the Church God judges. The Church did not "own" all the people who lived within their diocese; that idea was doctrinal error within the Church which should have been excised, but alas, they could not see the plank for the speck.I do not believe that anyone deserves to be burned alive. However, let us bend over backward to be fair to the RCC Church of the Middle Ages. The Church believed that heretics were effectively a cancer on the Body of Christ <snip>
So I guess when Luke told us Mary treasured up things in her heart, he did not tell us the whole story.There are three out of 18 RC churches left that claim to have the original foreskin of Jesus from His circumcision.<snip>
Glad to hear that broTyndale and I are of one mind on the pope and his laws.
Was Tyndale the only Reformer to go against Roman Catholic dogma/doctrines?
And how do others here view him? Thanks
http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/william-tyndale.html
A clergyman hopelessly entrenched in Roman Catholic dogma once taunted Tyndale with the statement, We are better to be without Gods laws than the Popes.
Tyndale was infuriated by such Roman Catholic heresies, and he replied, I defy the Pope and all his laws.
If God spare my life ere many years, I will cause the boy that drives the plow to know more of the scriptures than you!
I use my own translation of the Bibletyndales bible has more errors than the readers digest bible and his commentaries and prefaces were so ridiculous it becomes laughable, like "beating the fear of God into your wife".. Even prosecuted by the people who haply supported him.
Quite a folly of a man. More driven by anger and a venomous tongue than a real wanting to understand scripture or doctrine. I bet things could have changed if he and Erasmus had met. Erasmus was the same, in disliking the abuses of clergy, but at the same time he didn't let his emotions get the best of him where he started attacking the Church itself just because of corrupt priests.
I assume you are talking about the RCC?And that is precisely where the Church of the Middle Ages, and a bit earlier went into error. Per the Apostles, the heretics "went out from us" precisely because "they were not of us". Those outside the Church God judges. The Church did not "own" all the people who lived within their diocese; that idea was doctrinal error within the Church which should have been excised, but alas, they could not see the plank for the speck.
Have you read it?StThomasMore said:tyndales bible has more errors than the readers digest bible
.
At least it is only 4 so far.I can't believe there were 4 people on here with no idea who William Tyndale was!