- May 19, 2015
- 125,550
- 28,531
- 74
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Especially since the Vulgate has more errors than can be counted and RC interpretations are interpretted through the lens of medieval forgeries that completed changed the constitution of the western church and exalted the papacy and clergy to imperial status.
What would be your vote on the poll?source?
What would be your vote on the poll?![]()
Ok. ThanksI don't know much about the circumstances surrounding him. I believe in obedience to God-appointed men like the pope.
Thank you.Well, I voted, but the choices were limiting!
Was Tyndale the only Reformer to go against Roman Catholic dogma/doctrines?
And how do others here view him? Thanks
http://www.greatsite.com/timeline-english-bible-history/william-tyndale.html
A clergyman hopelessly entrenched in Roman Catholic dogma once taunted Tyndale with the statement, “We are better to be without God’s laws than the Pope’s”.
Tyndale was infuriated by such Roman Catholic heresies, and he replied, “I defy the Pope and all his laws.
If God spare my life ere many years, I will cause the boy that drives the plow to know more of the scriptures than you!”
Thank you brin.....Tyndale, i believe, was doing what must be done when man places himself above God. It's the ageless struggle since before the fall....it started with Satan striving to be as God, if not above Him. It's PRIDE, man's achilles heel. And it be an ooooogly thing.
i didn't vote...choices are kinda limited....i don't believe that Tyndale had it in for RC so to speak, he was speaking the truth of God's Word and rejecting the tyranny of man, and it happened to be within the RC at that time.
LOL c'mon LLOJ, ya gotta have more choices![]()
I suppose I could have added "other"i enjoy addable choice quizzes,
unfortunately, the polls are just not set up that way ..
ohwellsies ..
Tis a horrible death indeed
http://www.christianforums.com/t6486531/
That heretics be burned is against the will of the Spirit.
Interesting.I do not believe that anyone deserves to be burned alive. However, let us bend over backward to be fair to the RCC Church of the Middle Ages. The Church believed that heretics were effectively a cancer on the Body of Christ and that they had to either be forced to recant the error of their ways or to be killed, so that the their cancer of heresy would not spread to others and lead others into eternal damnation. As I understand it, the punishment for heresy was burning at the stake, because this would allow the heretics perhaps a few minutes to see the error of their ways and to make an Act of Perfect Contrition and thus save their souls, if not their lives. Immediately killing them by hanging them or chopping their heads off would not give them a chance to repent at the last minute and save their souls from Hell or so the Church felt.
How bout this for a reaction? <snip>
It's about time for something like that.
Hopefully RC can heal, learn how to love their Brothers and Sisters in Christ, and thereby show a little respect for the blood Jesus shed. The rest I'm not so worried about, although they do owe the whole world an apology for the dark ages ...