Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
First things first.
I totally agree; because if you can't get past Genesis 1, you won't understand the rest.
Getting past Genesis one is no problem. It's when you get to Genesis two where you begin to see the problems. I recommend you take more of a historical-critical look at your holy book, rather than a blind-devotional acceptance of it. The Bible is full of errors, contradictions and flat-out untruths, some intentional, some not. Oh, and BTW, they were there long before the internets.
We'll see about that.
)How is this a wrong or right question? I accept that there is text where this was actually written down at some point.We'll see about that.
Is, 'In the beginning, God...' wrong?
(And I do wish you would hurry up and answer, because my next question is even harder! I'm going to restate it, and simply add the next word in the verse! And this is just the tip of the iceberg!
Whoever you're talking to, I thought they were arguing with some science.
One sentence cannot cover such detailed points as you did in your thousand word essay.
Not interested.
Wrong, that contradicts plain english.
I already told him on theology web. Let me ask you
He does not have an answer. If you think there is an answer to the biogeography question that actually makes sense and explains the data let's hear it. So far all you have done is claim there are answers when there are none.
So you can't do it?
In plain English, statements that are alleged to be answers to a question but fail to answer the question are not really answer to the question.
I have explained in some detail why the alleged answers are nonsense. I am skeptical of the worldwide flood because it is falsified by biogeography, geology, palenotology, archeology, biodiversity and any other applicable branch of science.
There isn't the will. There will be the presentation of chance and necessity ignoring the mechanism at work within adaptation. The presentation of adaptation within organisms acting on the belief that Creationism or created organisms should not have the ability to adapt. The limits observed in adaptation overshadowed by speculations about limitless organisms. These primary conceptions contrary to the scientifically observed acting as a springboard for the rest of Darwinian literature. Then there is the ensuing stalemate which seeks to highlight the "Creationism will not be science" act even though it is more scientifically consistent by acknowledging the facts as stated above. Provided that there is the will or desire to persevere headlong into a gridlock, where a needed past time will manifest as cultured notions of Creationism, the intelligence of Creationists and biblical authors, then it will begin.
Yes I am sure you did 'told him' you do a lot of that.
whatever you want to beleive. I am not interested in a lot of things that other people are interested in.Wrong answer.
I'll search the board. I posted the question but I don't recall if any of the creationists there answered. It was a long time ago. But if you think Sarfati has any answers beyond the nonsense on the website you linked to why don't you ask him. It is your claim that he has answers. I say he has none and neither does any other YEC.
In other words you realize it is absurd.
In other words your mind is made up and you don't want to listen to any amount of facts and logic that show how absurd the supposed YEC answers to the biogeography question are.
In other words you don't understand plain English and simple logic.
No other words at all. Everyone has favorite topics, evolution is not one of mine. That is all you need to understand, its simple really.
I am right, you are wrong. There are no other words.
