P
Phinehas2
Guest
VertigoAge,
If you cant don’t be so arrogant as to expect others to see gossiping as wrong.
Well yes it is, same sex relationships are described as error and sexual immorality, and where Galatians 5 refers to the fruit of the spirit it also refers to the opposite which is obviously, sexual immorality. Your argument attributes the sin that some may do as fruit of the spirit because the people who do the sin are nice.Nope. That isn't what I'm proposing at all.
Let me stop you there. Are any Christians guilty of the sin of same sex relations?1. All Christians are guilty of sins
But those which are such as the ones which condemn same sex relations and presumably the Matthew 7 passages, are clear and thus not interpretations. If you can see that Romans 1 condemns gossiping then you can see it condemns men abandoning the natural relations with women and committing indecent acts with each other.2. Many Biblical passages are not 100% clear cut and do not have unanimous interpretations among Christians.
If you cant don’t be so arrogant as to expect others to see gossiping as wrong.
Which is what you seem to be suggesting about gossiping in Romans 1, the fruit of the spirit in Galatians 5 and Matthew 7.It bothers me when I see people here say, "the Bible says XYZ.
If one interpreted ‘Jesus is the way the truth and the life’ as Jesus isnt the way nor the truth nor the life, would that be a Christian?If you don't interpret it my way, you are not a Christian".
Well no it hasn’t, the view is called into question and the pro-gay side try and make out it is against them. There is no such thing as a gay Christian, the person is a Christian.Calling a self-identified Christian's faith into question is prohibited, and has happened many times in this thread.
Upvote
0