The "year" in Biblical times was not based on the solar year. In a thousand years, our Gregorian calendar differs the ancients' methods by 15,250 days. That's about 41 Gregorian calendar years.
WOW ! Praise God...I've never heard about this 15,250 day adjustment. How can I research this? There's also this issue over when the sun stood still and at least one other occasion when time was suspended, and if you consider the analysis from top theologians, their is this question over Christ's birth being 4 to 8 years late, invalidating the starting point for the Gregorian. So I use the mean of 6 years, making today's date "in or around" 2004, but only if you use His birth. I use His
resurrection as the pivotal point in time, while following a
6,000 man-year or
6 God-day of creation timetable for His
redemptive will toward man to complete. With this in mind, I add Christ's lifespan of 33yrs to 6 BC(Gregorian) arriving at 27 RE(Resurrection Era) as the true starting point from which to calculate the "watch" in which Christ returns. With these adjustments, today's date would then be 1993. Of course, this makes you 19 years old, using the ancients. Happy early 19th birthday my brother
Their years, and months, were based on Lunar cycles, specifically, the first appearance of the new moon. It was agreed upon by two qualified individuals who announced their joint siting of the moon, because "no one knew the day or the hour" that the new moon would appear.
This idea that the reappearance of the new moon was unknown is edifying. Where is this secret found?
I base my beliefs soley on the Scripture, not world events.
Amen to this standard. I'd draw a correlation between fundamental and technical systems of stock trading. Fundamentals can be fuzzy and often includes misrepresented and manipulative roomers, while technical analysis is based solely on trading activity from the standpoint of volumes, not easily misrepresented legally. When we use current events as fulfilled prophesies as time-line markers, we assume inspired knowledge, a most tenuous position, as the title of "false-prophet" could apply. Every generation since Christ's resurrection has prophesied His Second Coming to occur in its lifetime. This practice of vanity is difficult to resist due to our sin nature. After all, how can we NOT wish that the times of our lives be sooo important, that in and of itself, is proof enough of Christ's soon arrival? That certainly would elevate the importance of our work in Eschatology. VANITY OF VANITIES, ALL ARE VANITIES(not a direct quote). Point being, we could be dramatically wrong. I for one, haven't received direct and inspired prophecy to back my opinions on Eschatology. For instance, if Christ resurrected 3 ½ God-days of creation(3,500 man-years) after the garden expulsion, then my analysis will be off by a mere 500yrs too early, being that I base my calculations on Christ resurrecting at the very end of the 4th God-day of creation(4,000th man-year) from garden expulsion. This adjustment would tend to place the Second Coming "in or around" the year 2527, effectively removing our witnessing the event out the equation
Satan must be imprisoned for a literal 1000 years. Yes, God does consider this 1000 years as a day, a "day" of His rest, a day without Satan.
Would you agree with me, that the Millennium in which Christ rules with His saints, represents the "Millennium-Sabbath" ? It would appear we're one in Spirit on this account.
Oh, and in 5 days, I will be 16,801 days old. On the Gregorian calendar, that's 46 years old, but with the Biblical calculation, it's only 44. (You see why I prefer the ancient calendar..... )
I'm anxious to start a study concerning the Jubilee as a central theme in our Eschatology research. Would you be willing to help with this??? It's a difficult process to integrate sweeping new features in this business of foretelling the Second Coming(never to pinpoint of course), for me at least
God, forgive and be with us all...
