All Fulfilled at the Cross?

Status
Not open for further replies.

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Did Jesus say that ~HE~ is the resurrection and the life and that ~NOW~ is the judgment of this world? even: "I am come to send fire on the earth"?
:)
I view this as fulfilled on OC Jerusalem [tho I know the MJs will disagree]

Luke 9:54 Seeing yet His disciples James and John say "Lord! Thou are willing we may be saying 'fire to descend from the heaven and to consume them' even as EliYah did"?
[1 King 18:38/Reve 11:5/Reve 20:9]

Reve 8:5 And the Messenger has taken *the frankincensor and he crams-full *him out of the Fire of the Altar and cast it into the Land and became *thunders and sounds* and lightnings and earthquake
[Luke 12:49]

Reve 20:9 And they ascended upon the breadth of the land and surrounded the camp of the Saints and the City, the beloved
and descended fire out of the heaven from the God and devours them
 
Upvote 0

Tangible

Decision Theology = Ex Opere Operato
May 29, 2009
9,837
1,416
cruce tectum
Visit site
✟59,743.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Thanks Tangible, I didn't realize that was a Luther doctrine.
Well, to be exact, it is a Biblical doctrine which is held by Lutherans, Reformed and many other Christians.

I am just wondering though, if they explain somewhere how Jesus perfectly fulfilled all the laws given to Moses that didn't pertain to him, meaning Jesus, as all the law as a whole is not for one man only. [... etc.]

The obedience Law of God is binary in nature. Just as failing in one point of the law means that you have failed in the whole law (James 2:10), that Christ perfectly kept the law as it pertained to a firstborn Jewish male, does not negate the fact that he kept the whole law and kept it perfectly. As you pointed out earlier, Christ was sinless and righteous before ever having been born into the world. The righteousness he earned was not needed for himself, because he was already righteous. The righteousness he earned was for us sinful human beings who to a man stands righteously condemned before our Holy God.

There are many more I could go into but I think you can see my point of not understanding how any one person, G-d man or not can fulfill everything written in the law. He even said that the Torah would not be done away with until all is fulfilled, but he didn't say, it would be done away with once HE Fulfilled it. And he didn't say that because he can't.
The law has not been done away with. It continues to be written on the heart of every human being born into the world to restrain evil and to make human life possible on earth. It continues to hold up a mirror so that sinners may see their sinfulness and their desperate need for a Savior. For Christians it continues to teach us how to love God and love our neighbor as ourselves.

What it no longer does for Christians is to condemn us. We are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, and not by works under the Law. The Law no longer holds us under its judgment and under its penalty of death.

Matthew 5:17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.

Romans 10:4 For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.

Galatians 2:20 I have been crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the flesh I live by faith in the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me.

Romans 6:3 Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.

Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.

Galatians 3:27 For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.

Romans 7:4 Likewise, my brothers, you also have died to the law through the body of Christ, so that you may belong to another, to him who has been raised from the dead, in order that we may bear fruit for God.
 
Upvote 0

Fireinfolding

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2006
27,263
4,084
The South
✟121,561.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
:)
I view this as fulfilled on OC Jerusalem [tho I know the MJs will disagree]

Luke 9:54 Seeing yet His disciples James and John say "Lord! Thou are willing we may be saying 'fire to descend from the heaven and to consume them' even as EliYah did"?
[1 King 18:38/Reve 11:5/Reve 20:9]

Reve 8:5 And the Messenger has taken *the frankincensor and he crams-full *him out of the Fire of the Altar and cast it into the Land and became *thunders and sounds* and lightnings and earthquake
[Luke 12:49]

Reve 20:9 And they ascended upon the breadth of the land and surrounded the camp of the Saints and the City, the beloved
and descended fire out of the heaven from the God and devours them

Though to me it sounds like saying The Resurection is PAST I dont see the Resurrection as PAST because HE WAS (past) IS (present) and IS TO COME (future) And HE HATH delivered (past tense) DOTH deliver (present tense) and WILL YET deliver(future tense) as it pertains to so great of death. Paul wanted to know THE POWER OF HIS Resurrection (the power of the operation of God exerted in Christs resurection) THE FIRST its power of HIS Paul pressed on to know. Living and reigning with Him is connected to the gift of grace (they which receive). Rom 5:21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. Or For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ

Though passing from death unto life is evidenced (even in the letter) applying it to the heart (according to the Spirit). He that hateth his brother abideth in death (even until now). Arent there somethings you see concerning each man in their own order, or that is fulfilled in them (in regards to themselves laying hold of)?

Do you see what Im asking?
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
*snip*
Though to me it sounds like saying The Resurection is PAST I dont see the Resurrection as PAST because HE WAS (past) IS (present) and IS TO COME (future) And HE HATH delivered (past tense) DOTH deliver (present tense) and WILL YET deliver(future tense) as it pertains to so great of death. Paul wanted to know THE POWER OF HIS Resurrection (the power of the operation of God exerted in Christs resurection)

Do you see what Im asking?
How do you view Ezekiel 37 and the VoBs?
Those 2 witnesses in Revelation 11 appear to be a type of Ressurection to me? Thoughts?

Ezekiel 37:10 So I prophesied as He commanded me and breath came into them and they lived and they stood upon their feet, an exceedingly great army. 11 Then He said to me, "Son of adam, these bones are the whole house of Israel.
[Luke 2:34/Revelation 11:11]

Luke 2:34 And Simon blesses them and said toward Mary His mother "behold! this-one is set/lying for the falling and ressurection/ana-stasin <386> in many to-the Israel and into a Sign spoken against"
[Ezekiel 37 "valley of bones"/Reve 11:11]

Reve 11:11 And after the three days and half-equal, a spirit/breath of life out of the God entered in them and they stand/esthsan <2476> (5627) on their feet and great fear falls upon the ones observing them.

Reve 20:5 The rest of the dead-ones not live until should be being finished the thousand years. This the Resurrection/ana-stasiV <386>, the First/prwth <4413>.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
More to come.. all prophecy has not been fulfilled.. Christ is not done with us yet.. Sin is not won...Righteousness has not been victorious in us...He will fulfill in us, that which we could not do ... in Him, we trust.
Tis true.
But according to Amills/Post-Mills it is :)

http://www.scripture4all.org/

John 19:30 When then the Jesus had received/got the vinegar, He said "it has been finished!/tetelestai <5055> (5769)".
And reclining the head He gives-up the spirit.

Reve 15:1 And I saw another Sign in the Heaven, great and marvelous.
Messengers seven, having stripes/blows seven, the last, that in them is-finished/etelesqh <5055> (5681) the Fury/qumoV <2372> of the God

http://www.christianforums.com/t7405089-4/#post53043894
What the sign?
 
Upvote 0

Fireinfolding

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2006
27,263
4,084
The South
✟121,561.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How do you view Ezekiel 37 and the VoBs?
Those 2 witnesses in Revelation 11 appear to be a type of Ressurection to me? Thoughts?

Ezekiel 37:10 So I prophesied as He commanded me and breath came into them and they lived and they stood upon their feet, an exceedingly great army. 11 Then He said to me, "Son of adam, these bones are the whole house of Israel.
[Luke 2:34/Revelation 11:11]

Luke 2:34 And Simon blesses them and said toward Mary His mother "behold! this-one is set/lying for the falling and ressurection/ana-stasin <386> in many to-the Israel and into a Sign spoken against"
[Ezekiel 37 "valley of bones"/Reve 11:11]

Reve 11:11 And after the three days and half-equal, a spirit/breath of life out of the God entered in them and they stand/esthsan <2476> (5627) on their feet and great fear falls upon the ones observing them.

Reve 20:5 The rest of the dead-ones not live until should be being finished the thousand years. This the Resurrection/ana-stasiV <386>, the First/prwth <4413>.

No I agree Im not disagreeing with that The Spirit of the glory of God rested upon them He was made for a sign to be spoken again. But are you saying that all people are partaking (now) of the same?


Luke 2:34 Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against

Same here

1Peter 4:14 If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are ye; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you: on their part he is evil spoken of, but on your part he is glorified.

Im regarding this in relation to this

John 12:28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
*snip*
No I agree Im not disagreeing with that The Spirit of the glory of God rested upon them He was made for a sign to be spoken again. But are you saying that all people are partaking (now) of the same?

1Peter 4:14 If ye be reproached for the name of Christ, happy are ye; for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you: on their part he is evil spoken of, but on your part he is glorified.

Im regarding this in relation to this

John 12:28 Father, glorify thy name. Then came there a voice from heaven, saying, I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.
Yes!!!! :thumbsup: :clap:

2 Thessalonians 1:10 Whenever He shall be coming to be glorified/endoxasqhnai <1740> (5683) in His Saints and to be marvelled in all the ones believing, that was believed the testimony of us upon ye in the Day, that .
[Zech 14:5/Ezekiel 39:13/Reve 19]

Ezekiel 39:13 And all of people of the land bury them and He becomes to them a name day of to be Glorified of Me declaration of my Lord YHWH.
[2 Thess 1:10]
 
Upvote 0

Fireinfolding

Well-Known Member
Dec 17, 2006
27,263
4,084
The South
✟121,561.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes!!!! :thumbsup: :clap:

2 Thessalonians 1:10 Whenever He shall be coming to be glorified/endoxasqhnai <1740> (5683) in His Saints and to be marvelled in all the ones believing, that was believed the testimony of us upon ye in the Day, that .
[Zech 14:5/Ezekiel 39:13/Reve 19]

Ezekiel 39:13 And all of people of the land bury them and He become to them a name day of to be Glorified of Me declaration of my Lord YHWH. [2 Thess 1:10]

I gotcha THANKS Lamb I agree :thumbsup::amen:

Ok so you see it as displayed in the past (but as that which works in the saints) but your not saying its all past (experiencially) for all are you?

For instance, its our HOPE just as Christ IN us (The Resurrection) is OUR HOPE of glory. He is WAS IS and is TO COME. He comes a second time unto them which look to Him. Do you regard that as past (experientially so) for them (alone) or for all (of every generation) of (the chosen generation)... How do I put this... Although I know the world receiveth Him not for it SEETH HIM not (as we look AT things NOT SEEN but not at the things which are seen). Is it past only in your eyes or do you consider it as laying hold of THAT which Christ hath laid hold of me (type thing)?

Am I making any sense?
 
Upvote 0

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
15,285
3,556
Louisville, Ky
✟821,759.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
icon5.gif
All Fulfilled at the Cross?
All fulfilled? What was fulfilled at the cross are the works necessary for justification. Jesus' works are done. We cannot be justified by our own works. Justification only comes through faith.

I have been reading through many posts of many posters and have come to the conclusion that 90% of those that post here regularly believe without a doubt that everything in the Torah and the Prophets has been fulfilled by Jesus on the Cross. I have tried to reason with some (some are unreasonable and can't be reasoned with because they have a tainted view because I am a Jew, and some have even gone so far to say that I blaspheme G-d by following his commandments, as well as listening to Jesus by his command to keep my commandments) but so far that has been unfruitful.
Following his commandments and depending on your obeying them as your justification are two separate things. The Jews of Jerusalem followed the Mosaic Law but relied on their faith in the works of Christ as their justification.
Now a brief study of the gospel of John will show that From our time of knowing that G-d existed (by the words written down my Moses in Genesis) Jesus was also in existence. Of course at that time he had not been born of a human woman, but he was in existence. Now I understand that this is a hard concept to wrap one's mind around, and it takes some doing, but I believe John.
Do you have a hard time with the concept that Christianity believes that Jesus is eternal? He always was with God and is God. He was before the world and universe.


Now it says here that ALL things were made by him, and WITHOUT him Nothing that was made was made. So, that tells me that everything that came into existence did so with him. EVERYTHING.
With him? Don't you mean by him or through him?
John 1:
2 He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came to be through him, and without him nothing came to be.
The Laws of G-d given to Moses on Mt Sinai have to be included here, or we have to throw out the beginning of John.
This is only your interpretation and not supported by scripture.
So as you can see it stands to reason that Jesus was 100% involved in the creating and giving of the commandments to Israel through Moses.
I think that we would agree with this but you being a Jew would also know that the Laws given to Israel by Moses were not given to all mankind. Jews believe that non-Jews are governed by what God gave Noah.

So it is my belief that what John writes in the opening of his eye-witness gospel is the Truth.
We agree that what John writes is the truth but not with your expanded understanding.

All has not been fulfilled so the Torah has not been dissolved, demolished, or annulled according to the one who wrote it and said this.

Destroy = dissolve, demolish, annul.
All is not done which was foretold in the OT but the Mosaic Law could never justify a person. Jesus fulfilled the demands of the Law so that all, past, present, and future can be justified through faith.

We await all that God has in store for us.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,141
7,243
✟494,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
LuLav--

Here's the thing you're missing in your understanding:

Deut. 5:1 And Moses called all Israel, and said unto them, Hear, O Israel, the statutes and judgments which I speak in your ears this day, that ye may learn them, and keep, and do them.

v2 The LORD our God made a covenant with us in Horeb.

v3 The LORD made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us, [even] us, who [are] all of us here alive this day.

Who are the fathers? Abraham, Isaac, Jacob. Hence, we may hear of Abraham's faith and justification.

So, even though Christ Jesus existed from the beginning, I, a Gentile, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and others are not part of that covenant made at Sinai.

Hope that helps your understanding.
That may be your understanding but I don't see how that is relevant to the OP. I was speaking of:

So as you can see it stands to reason that Jesus was 100% involved in the creating and giving of the commandments to Israel through Moses.

You don't believe that these commandments he was part of giving?

I am very familiar with what you posted from D'varim which is the real name of the book you call Deuteronomy. (The word comes from the text itself, it means Words, it is the plural of 'Word', in Hebrew this is one of the names of our Savior, HaD'var. The Word.)

Those words you quoted are what we believe to be for everyone of Israel from that day and down through the generations. The covenant that Moses was speaking of that had happened 39+ years before was the marriage covenant. I know who our fathers are. :) They of course were not there to take part but those who came from them were of a specific line. Now regarding Abraham, he was not justified just by faith, but by obedience and his works in respect to the commandments that G-d gave to him.

No, you are not part of the covenant made through Abraham regarding the land, nor the one regarding the descendants either. But the covenant that was made at the foot of the mountain was a marriage covenant.

Do you believe in the marriage supper of the lamb? Do you believe that the body of Messiah is his bride? Do you believe that Jesus and G-d are one?

Nice sidebar, but lets keep to the OP about all being fulfilled. You presented a rabbit trail but did not answer the basic premiss of it ALL being fulfilled at the cross. I really would like to talk about that. If you want to talk about the Marriage and Mt Sinai, perhaps we could in another thread? :) I would be happy to.

Oh, one other thing, I know you all don't like me here and don't like my understanding of the Scriptures for one reason or another and think that I act superior or other things that have been said. But truly I believe that you are my brothers and sisters in Messiah (well at least most of you, there are a few tares in this internet field also) and I wish to commune with you and share with you about our G-d. You all act at times like there is this great chasm that shouldn't be breached between us. This is what a Rabbinic Orthodox Jew would tell you and also some Messianics as well. Yes, I have a Messianic icon, but that is in compliance with this site, but that doesn't mean that I think like many of them, so please just accept me as a fellow believer? Ok? If I really wanted to show a division, I would tell you as some do, that you can't have any part in what G-d gave to his people. I would say you can't keep the Sabbath (Unbelieving Jews hate it when gentiles do that, in case you didn't know that), you can't eat Kosher, you can't celebrate G-ds feasts of Salvation, etc. But he decided you could and I accept that, even if most of you reject that gift.


So please let us reason together as one. Let us be as they were at this time, almost 2,000 years ago as they awaited the coming of Shavuot/Pentecost, they were of one accord, and these were all Jews, do you know how Hard that is! !@!!!:o:D:D:D^_^ (I'm sure you've heard Two Jews, three opinions!).
 
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,141
7,243
✟494,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
My answers will be in Dark Blue :)

Lulav: I have been reading through many posts of many posters and have come to the conclusion that 90% of those that post here regularly believe without a doubt that everything in the Torah and the Prophets has been fulfilled by Jesus on the Cross. I have tried to reason with some (some are unreasonable and can't be reasoned with because they have a tainted view because I am a Jew, and some have even gone so far to say that I blaspheme G-d by following his commandments, as well as listening to Jesus by his command to keep my commandments) but so far that has been unfruitful.
AM: I can't imagine how starting a conversation this way helps, but it does make we want to ask you if you think more of yourself or your own personal understanding of the scriptures, and especially the law, because you are a Messianic?
I was trying to preface my reason for starting this and also hoping that it could be discussed without that bias. I addressed this in my last post so won't take the time to do so here.
Lulav :Now a brief study of the gospel of John will show that From our time of knowing that G-d existed (by the words written down by Moses in Genesis) Jesus was also in existence. Of course at that time he had not been born of a human woman, but he was in existence. Now I understand that this is a hard concept to wrap one's mind around, and it takes some doing, but I believe John.
AM: :thumbsup:

Which is why God could say He (being the God OF THE LIVING and NOT THE DEAD) was the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - even before Christ (Who IS OUR LIFE) was ever even born.
bow.gif
Lulav:The word translated from the Greek for 'made' is 'Ginomai'. It's definition is of course to be made but more clearly, 'to begin to be', or to 'come into existence', or to appear at a certain time in history.

This includes the creation of course as John is taking us back there, and it would have to also entail any other creative act.

The Laws of G-d given to Moses on Mt Sinai have to be included here, or we have to throw out the beginning of John.

We also have to throw out what Jesus said "I and the Father are ONE".

So as you can see it stands to reason that Jesus was 100% involved in the creating and giving of the commandments to Israel through Moses.

There are many occasions where G-d is having a communication with man where a visable manifestation is involved. Now G-d is Spirit, but does that mean he can't create a form, a vessel to use for this occasion? If we don't believe that he can do that then we have to not believe these visitations.

Such as

Gen 3:8 Where Adam and Eve hear the sound of G-d walking in the Garden.

or

Gen. 18 Where it specifically says the the L-RD appeared to Abraham in the plains of Mamre, this was shortly before the destruction of Sodom and G'mmorah.

or

Joshua when he came into the land and meet with the 'angel of the L-RD' who told him to remove his shoes for he was standing on HOLY ground. This was not an average messenger, aka angel. Only G-d himself can proclaim a ground Holy, as he did when he spoke to Moses through the burning bush that was not consumed.

There are many more but that should suffice for now. Many call these theopanies, others call them something else, but they are all identified with G-d in a physical form.

So it is my belief that what John writes in the opening of his eye-witness gospel is the Truth.

When Peter was speaking to all the Jews from around the world on that first Shavuot (Pentecost) he said to them:
17 And now, brethren, I wot that through ignorance ye did it, as did also your rulers. 18 But those things, which G-d before had shewed by the mouth of all his prophets, that Christ should suffer , he hath so fulfilled .​
He tells us here that what the risen Messiah had come to fulfill, he had fulfilled. But no where does he say that he fulfilled the whole Torah or even all that the Prophets said, there is more to come. If Peter had said this, there would have been a riot and he probably would have been taken off and stoned. Instead this is what happened.
19 Repent ye therefore, and be converted , that your sins may be blotted out , when the times of refreshing shall come * from the presence of the Lord; 20 And he shall send Jesus Christ, which before was preached unto you: 21 Whom the heaven * must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God hath spoken by the mouth of all his holy prophets since the world began.
Notice the Peter says here, even after the crucifixion, and arising from the grave and the ascension into heaven that this things are still to come? Which means not everything has been fulfilled, including our sins being blotted out! These will be, WHEN the times of refreshing comes, when the L-RD G-d sends Jesus back, who for now is in heaven until the time when the restitution of all things happens.

Has not happened yet.
AM: That might depend on how you see "the times of refreshing"? Why times (plural) rather than time (singular)? What about the fact that Jesus said: "I will not leave you comfortless, I will come to you" when speaking about sending the Comforter? And that it is UNTO THEM THAT LOOK FOR HIM that Christ comes THE SECOND TIME? And that it is at HIS (the Comforter/ Holy Spirit / Spirit of Truth/Christ) COMING that the world is judged?


I see it from the Greek definition of the word. I don't know why some bibles translate it in the plural and am not familiar enough with Greek Grammar for pluralities only Hebrew, but my concordance gives this definition:
Kairos:
  1. due measure
  2. a measure of time, a larger or smaller portion of time, hence:
    1. a fixed and definite time, the time when things are brought to crisis, the decisive epoch waited for
    2. opportune or seasonable time
    3. the right time
    4. a limited period of time
    5. to what time brings, the state of the times, the things and events of time
    And it is translated this way:


time 64, season 13, opportunity 2, due time 2, always + (1722) +&version=kjv 3956 2, not translated 1, miscellaneous 3

_____________________________________________________

I don't even see it as being translated as time(s) so it's a moot point for now. Besides the other definitions make me believe that it is the closest equivalent to the word in Hebrew of moed or plural moedim. I see my guess was right, I looked it up quickly and on a Greek Orthodox site it says that those two words are of the same meaning. So, with that established I can say what is meant by that. Definition a,b and c together would define this. The feasts of the L-RD are done in due season, each year, in his cyclical calendar. Jesus for example was born at a specific time so he could be crucified on a specific time (Kairos or Moed) for a specific purpose. So then my understanding stands, it is one specific time in the future when all is made new, G-ds plan for mankind is complete, and all is put back to rights as it was perfect in the beginning.

In address to the second part of your question: While he is absent in the flesh, (he still has flesh, only it is living flesh that is incorruptible). But while he in the flesh is in heaven performing the duties he needs to perform as our High Priest (that is the current position and state he is in now) he has sent us His/and the Father's Spirit to comfort us while we are separate from him. This is a very intimate love token. We also need to remember what else he is doing right now, he is preparing a place for us, he is our bridegroom and he has gone off to prepare the eternal home for us. But he knows that it will be quite awhile, not a short period of time like a earthly Jewish wedding so he sends us this part of himself to help us get through that waiting time.

Currently I believe that he was to come in the flesh twice. First time as the servant, like Joseph was a slave in Egypt (the last time his brothers saw him), but the second time he will appear in the flesh as the King (like Joseph was when his brothers saw him next). In between that time I believe he sends for his bride, but does not make an earthly appearance. When his second earthly appearance comes, that is when all Israel will recognize him and all Israel will be saved. However those who have hated them and G-d them he will destroy with the sword of his mouth. (Judgment day is later).



More to come, I went over the letter limit! :doh:
 
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,141
7,243
✟494,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Originally posted by angelmom01;54616157



Lulav
: So now you must ask yourself and examine the Torah and the prophets as a good scholar would and see what has been fulfilled and what has not.
AM:True! Even Jesus, when he stood to read the Psalms, did not read the whole passage. Could it be that the time had come for only one portion of the prophesy to be fulfilled?

Exactly!:thumbsup: And he said to them what he had read had been fulfilled in their very sight. But the part he did not read has yet to still be fulfilled by him. :)
Lulav:According to Peter who was commissioned directly by Jesus to be the head of his earthly body and to make what is called Halakcha, which means the way to walk or the way to follow the commandments, which is what Jesus was doing a big part of the time on earth.
AM:This BODY has only ONE HEAD, Lulav. And it is not Peter. Christ is THE HEAD OF THE CHURCH... even THE HEAD OF EVERY MAN.

Sorry, I think you are maybe confused about the Hebrew understanding of this? Yes, the Body of Messiah has one Head, that Head is in Heaven. You don't have to shout at me , I understand you are zealous for the truth, so am I more than most know. But I go by the words of Jesus himself and Understand them in the context they were given in. First let's get back to Joseph. Do you remember the story how the Pharaoh, who considered himself God put Joseph in charge of all he had? Do you remember how he told the people that when you see him, you are to treat him as if you had seen me myself? This was a picture of the True G-d and his son.

Pharaoh = True G-d
Joseph = Messiah, son of G-d

Now Jesus was the representation of G-d in Heaven, here on earth as was Joseph the representation of Pharaoh amongst the people but in his palace.

Now before Jesus left, he choose someone to put in charge over his body, in a person. Jesus was a Rabbi, in fact he was 'The Rabbi'. Now he did not give that title to Peter because he taught them to call no man Rabbi, only he was their Rabbi, their teacher. But, he did give him one of the duties, privileges what ever you want to call it, that Rabbis of that day and still today have, that of making what we call Halakah. Literally interpreted it means the Way to walk. It means how to do the instructions given by G-d in the right way. That is why he said to him:

Matthew 16:19
And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven:
and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven:
and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
This binding and loosing are terms used to describe a Rabbi's job or authority to make Halakah. Of course after the L-RD sent his Holy Spirit, this is what guided Peter to do this, as he did not make halakah of his own accord, but prayed so that the Messiah's will would be done.

The Rabbi (Jesus) was gone, and there needed to be someone to turn to when a doctrinal question came up. Jesus left Peter in charge of this, he said it himself and it is proper Jewish custom. True it was later taken away from the Jews and twisted and tainted from it's true meaning but that was how it started. That is why you see Peter at the believers headquarters in Jerusalem he didn't go back to fishing, he had a new job.:)

Lulav: According to this Peter, Shimon, he tells us through the words to the Jews on Pentecost that they needed to repent and turn back to G-d so that their sins would be forgiven when the "times of refreshing come".
AM: And then the Holy Spirit was poured upon all those who believed, no?

Yes, but this was not the time, they were being told by Peter to turn back to G-d fully, to repent, to accept the atonement Jesus had made for their sins. Atonement means to cover, not take away. Our sins will be taken away when all is made new, and that means that sin will no longer exist, no temptation, but pure as the L-RD made Adam and Eve to start with.
Lulav:For Jesus said:
16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy , but to fulfil . 18 For verily I say unto you, Till * heaven and earth pass , one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till * all be fulfilled .
AM::amen:

This was spoken BEFORE Christ was crucified and FULFILLED THE LAW, was it not?

No, that is what this whole thread is about. He came in the flesh at that time to fulfill what had been written about him pertaining to that time. But like you saw, in that Isaiah passage when he was reading in the synagogue that he did not finish the reading. And the Day of the L-RD has not come yet. Just as he came the first time as the the lamb, the second time he will come as the majestic Lion! But the first time he did not fulfill that, nor has he yet. So all is not fulfilled.
Lulav:But we can see from above from what Peter said, that not all was fulfilled yet, not even our sins being blotted out yet. They have been covered, but not blotted out. There is a difference.

An example of something that Jesus did not fulfill of the prophets because it wasn't directly about him and it was not he who could fulfill it, is this, found in Acts 1, again we see Peter who has the understanding of what his friend and Lord was teaching while he traveled with him day and night for three and a half years. That they needed to attend to fulfilling scripture concerning Judas.
15 And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said , (the number of names together were about an hundred and twenty,) 16 Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have been fulfilled , which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus.
AM:And it was fulfilled, no?

It was fulfilled but not by him or not by him dying on the cross. this is what I've been trying to say. And there are still many things that need to be fulfilled and not until they are all fulfilled with the Torah be destroyed.
Lulav:And we see the Peter realizes that the scripture below needs to be fulfilled regarding this:
For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein * : and his bishoprick let another take .
Then they choose from among all those who have been eye-witnesses to the L-rds ministry and choose two men. Then with the guidance of the Holy Spirit Mattathias is chosen to replace Judas. Now that scripture in the Psalms is fulfilled.
AM: :thumbsup:
So your point is that not all things were fulfilled "by Jesus on the cross"; that other prophesies still needed to be fulfilled even after the cross.... and even now some remain to be fulfilled?

:thumbsup::amen: Exactly!

I would not disagree with that... but how does that show that THE LAW is not "done away in Christ", just the scriptures so state? What does that have to do with other prophesies being fulfilled or when/how they are fulfilled?

The Torah which many refer to as the Law, still has prophecies in it not fulfilled. What was fulfilled by the crucifixion is that a true spotless lamb, the lamb of G-d promised to come, to Abraham (this is how Abraham saw Jesus day as he speaks of in the Gospel of John) shed his blood, to cover our sins, and our debt to the consequences of breaking the law of G-d was paid. For those who believed of course.
Lulav: But there are many more, in the prophets and also the Torah that have not.

There are many prophecies in the book of Genesis which haven't been fulfilled and we see by the Prophet Isaiah of when they will be.
I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say: My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please. Isa 46:10
AM: So you don't see a difference between "the law" and "prophesies"?

Yes there is a difference, of course but if we are using the measuring stick that Jesus gave to tell us when they would be done away with we can't make a distinction in this case.

17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy , but to fulfil . 18 For verily I say unto you, Till * heaven and earth pass , one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till * all be fulfilled . 19 Whosoever * therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
As you can see by this quote from Matthew 5 he is grouping them together here speaking of doing away with them. So here he sees them as a unit. Which is true in a sense. There would be no reason for prophets if all was followed in the Torah. Also Jesus is spoken of in both the Torah and the Prophets which does also include the Psalms too.
LULAV:All has not been fulfilled so the Torah has not been dissolved, demolished, or annulled according to the one who wrote it and said this.

17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy , but to fulfil . 18 For verily I say unto you, Till * heaven and earth pass , one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till * all be fulfilled .
Destroy = dissolve, demolish, annul.
AM:The fact that not all PROPHESIES have been fulfilled (every tear has not yet been dried, for example... God is not "all in all" for example) wouldn't negate THE LAW OF MOSES from being fulfilled.... it being A SHADOW of BETTER THINGS TO COME (Christ).

Is Christ not come?

He has come once, but promised to come again. At that time all will be fulfilled.

[Can I request, again, that you not put your scriptures in quotes if you want them addressed? Anything in quotes does not carry over when someone replies to your post. You can indent them and get almost the same result as you do when quoting them - just without the "quote" indicator. Obviously you have your own posting style and this is only a request, but it would make it much easier for others to address them. Otherwise they don't stay with the quoted post and you have to go back to get them which you cannot always do if your reply is not on the same page of the thread. Thanks!]

I heard you the first time. :) However this is the way I've always posted to this board. When Erwin was here he had a different quoting system that would put the quotes in a little box. I don't care for this system but have made over 30,000 posts since being a member here for almost 10 years (I had a different account when I joined before, now defunct) and some habits are hard to break. I will try to use the indent feature, but please bear with me while I try to get the hang of it. Once you get past fifty, technical things don't 'click' as quickly as they used to! :)
[/quote] I hope I have answered your questions and thank you for a lovely discussion. I have to come back to this later however since it's taken me two hours to make this one post and I have to get some work done! :)

Till next time................
 
Upvote 0

Lulav

Y'shua is His Name
Aug 24, 2007
34,141
7,243
✟494,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
While most take this reference to a new heaven and new earth to be speaking about God's physical creation, I think that there are other possibilities.

Even Peter speaks of the world that once was and the one that now is:
2Pe 3:3-8 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished: But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men. But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
Ever done a study on the thousand years and THE DAY of the Lord which, spiritually is TODAY (as opposed THE NIGHT being "as YESTERDAY" when it is PAST)?

God "divided" THE LIGHT from THE DARKNESS... so is ONE DAY "divided" between THE NIGHT and THE DAY (God having a Covenant with both and both being connected to "a thousand years").

Very cool study, if you are ever looking for something to dig into. :thumbsup:
NO, not from that perspective, but I'll look into it. As far as what Peter was saying, I believe that and other verses from the Tenach explain more of what is now being called the gap theory which I have believe in for over 25-30 years now. I don't believe that Noah's flood was the first one. :)
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
NO, not from that perspective, but I'll look into it. As far as what Peter was saying, I believe that and other verses from the Tenach explain more of what is now being called the gap theory which I have believe in for over 25-30 years now. I don't believe that Noah's flood was the first one. :)
If it is any consolation to ya, that is also my view.
Notice the hebrew doesn't say "in THE beginning" [there is no article "the" in it] but just "in [a] beginning" in Gene 1:2

Scripture4All - Greek/Hebrew interlinear Bible software


Gene 1:1 In beginning 'Elohiym created the heavens and the land.
2 And the land she-became chaos/vain and voided,

The Genesis Flood: Why the Bible Says It Must be Local

...........This paper has shown that the Bible declares the Genesis flood to be local in extent, though universal in its judgment of humans (with the exception of Noah and his family). The evidence presented here is purely biblical, although a strong case could also be given for extra-biblical reasons. ...........

..............When you read an English translation of the biblical account of the flood, you will undoubtedly notice many words and verses that seem to suggest that the waters covered all of planet earth.3 However, one should note that today we look at everything from a global perspective, whereas the Bible nearly always refers to local geography. You may not be able to determine this fact from our English translations, so we will look at the original Hebrew, which is the word of God.

The Hebrew words which are translated as "whole earth" or "all the earth" are kol (Strong's number H3605), which means "all," and erets (Strong's number H776), which means "earth," "land," "country," or "ground."4 We don't need to look very far in Genesis (Genesis 2) before we find the Hebrew words ........
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

bugkiller

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2015
17,773
2,634
✟80,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
That may be your understanding but I don't see how that is relevant to the OP. I was speaking of:



You don't believe that these commandments he was part of giving?

I am very familiar with what you posted from D'varim which is the real name of the book you call Deuteronomy. (The word comes from the text itself, it means Words, it is the plural of 'Word', in Hebrew this is one of the names of our Savior, HaD'var. The Word.)

Those words you quoted are what we believe to be for everyone of Israel from that day and down through the generations. The covenant that Moses was speaking of that had happened 39+ years before was the marriage covenant. I know who our fathers are. :) They of course were not there to take part but those who came from them were of a specific line. Now regarding Abraham, he was not justified just by faith, but by obedience and his works in respect to the commandments that G-d gave to him.

No, you are not part of the covenant made through Abraham regarding the land, nor the one regarding the descendants either. But the covenant that was made at the foot of the mountain was a marriage covenant.

Do you believe in the marriage supper of the lamb? Do you believe that the body of Messiah is his bride? Do you believe that Jesus and G-d are one?

Nice sidebar, but lets keep to the OP about all being fulfilled. You presented a rabbit trail but did not answer the basic premiss of it ALL being fulfilled at the cross. I really would like to talk about that. If you want to talk about the Marriage and Mt Sinai, perhaps we could in another thread? :) I would be happy to.

Oh, one other thing, I know you all don't like me here and don't like my understanding of the Scriptures for one reason or another and think that I act superior or other things that have been said. But truly I believe that you are my brothers and sisters in Messiah (well at least most of you, there are a few tares in this internet field also) and I wish to commune with you and share with you about our G-d. You all act at times like there is this great chasm that shouldn't be breached between us. This is what a Rabbinic Orthodox Jew would tell you and also some Messianics as well. Yes, I have a Messianic icon, but that is in compliance with this site, but that doesn't mean that I think like many of them, so please just accept me as a fellow believer? Ok? If I really wanted to show a division, I would tell you as some do, that you can't have any part in what G-d gave to his people. I would say you can't keep the Sabbath (Unbelieving Jews hate it when gentiles do that, in case you didn't know that), you can't eat Kosher, you can't celebrate G-ds feasts of Salvation, etc. But he decided you could and I accept that, even if most of you reject that gift.


So please let us reason together as one. Let us be as they were at this time, almost 2,000 years ago as they awaited the coming of Shavuot/Pentecost, they were of one accord, and these were all Jews, do you know how Hard that is! !@!!!:o:D:D:D^_^ (I'm sure you've heard Two Jews, three opinions!).
Lulav, I do admire you for coming on a Christian board as a Jewess and at least attempting to talk to us with mostly our terminology (religious language). One thing you can't do and that is tell us how our christianity should be lived or what we should believe. I do understand your problem with concepts as the trinity, being Jewish. You can go to any bookstore and get a Strong's concordance and look for scripture quotes from or of Jesus saying My Father with Jesus being the reciepant ie My Father gave Me and there will be more than 30 listings of this type. Get one that highlight Jesus quotes. Make sure that it has definitions not just the times a word is translated as something. They range from 20 to 30 bucks. Even Barnes and Noble usually has one on the shelf. Or get one through the net. It is better for study purposes in a hard copy. I have wore out at least three of them.

Some ofmy most favorite buddies are Who, When, Where, Why and their ring leader How. They have made me many friends and a few enemies especially mindless parrots. So be a llittle more inquisitive.

bugkiller
927154.gif
 
Upvote 0

Frogster

Galatians is the best!
Sep 7, 2009
44,343
3,067
✟74,317.00
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Republican
Me persoanally..I will opt for a good ole fashioned Italian feast anytime!

Great levitically unclean food!

Shrimp scampli,calamari,lobster fra-diavlo,spaghetti with white clam sauce....

And of course,a good meat sauce with pork sausages in it.:yum:
 
  • Like
Reactions: nephilimiyr
Upvote 0

bugkiller

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2015
17,773
2,634
✟80,400.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Originally posted by angelmom01;54616157



Lulav: So now you must ask yourself and examine the Torah and the prophets as a good scholar would and see what has been fulfilled and what has not.

AM:True! Even Jesus, when he stood to read the Psalms, did not read the whole passage. Could it be that the time had come for only one portion of the prophesy to be fulfilled?

Exactly!:thumbsup: And he said to them what he had read had been fulfilled in their very sight. But the part he did not read has yet to still be fulfilled by him. :)
Lulav:According to Peter who was commissioned directly by Jesus to be the head of his earthly body and to make what is called Halakcha, which means the way to walk or the way to follow the commandments, which is what Jesus was doing a big part of the time on earth.

AM:This BODY has only ONE HEAD, Lulav. And it is not Peter. Christ is THE HEAD OF THE CHURCH... even THE HEAD OF EVERY MAN.

Sorry, I think you are maybe confused about the Hebrew understanding of this? Yes, the Body of Messiah has one Head, that Head is in Heaven. You don't have to shout at me , I understand you are zealous for the truth, so am I more than most know. But I go by the words of Jesus himself and Understand them in the context they were given in. First let's get back to Joseph. Do you remember the story how the Pharaoh, who considered himself God put Joseph in charge of all he had? Do you remember how he told the people that when you see him, you are to treat him as if you had seen me myself? This was a picture of the True G-d and his son.

Pharaoh = True G-d
Joseph = Messiah, son of G-d

Now Jesus was the representation of G-d in Heaven, here on earth as was Joseph the representation of Pharaoh amongst the people but in his palace.

Now before Jesus left, he choose someone to put in charge over his body, in a person. Jesus was a Rabbi, in fact he was 'The Rabbi'. Now he did not give that title to Peter because he taught them to call no man Rabbi, only he was their Rabbi, their teacher. But, he did give him one of the duties, privileges what ever you want to call it, that Rabbis of that day and still today have, that of making what we call Halakah. Literally interpreted it means the Way to walk. It means how to do the instructions given by G-d in the right way. That is why he said to him:

Matthew 16:19 This binding and loosing are terms used to describe a Rabbi's job or authority to make Halakah. Of course after the L-RD sent his Holy Spirit, this is what guided Peter to do this, as he did not make halakah of his own accord, but prayed so that the Messiah's will would be done.

The Rabbi (Jesus) was gone, and there needed to be someone to turn to when a doctrinal question came up. Jesus left Peter in charge of this, he said it himself and it is proper Jewish custom. True it was later taken away from the Jews and twisted and tainted from it's true meaning but that was how it started. That is why you see Peter at the believers headquarters in Jerusalem he didn't go back to fishing, he had a new job.:)
Lulav: According to this Peter, Shimon, he tells us through the words to the Jews on Pentecost that they needed to repent and turn back to G-d so that their sins would be forgiven when the "times of refreshing come".

AM: And then the Holy Spirit was poured upon all those who believed, no?

Yes, but this was not the time, they were being told by Peter to turn back to G-d fully, to repent, to accept the atonement Jesus had made for their sins. Atonement means to cover, not take away. Our sins will be taken away when all is made new, and that means that sin will no longer exist, no temptation, but pure as the L-RD made Adam and Eve to start with.
Lulav:For Jesus said:
16 Let your light so shine before men, that they may see your good works, and glorify your Father which is in heaven.

17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy , but to fulfil . 18 For verily I say unto you, Till * heaven and earth pass , one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till * all be fulfilled .

AM::amen:

This was spoken BEFORE Christ was crucified and FULFILLED THE LAW, was it not?

No, that is what this whole thread is about. He came in the flesh at that time to fulfill what had been written about him pertaining to that time. But like you saw, in that Isaiah passage when he was reading in the synagogue that he did not finish the reading. And the Day of the L-RD has not come yet. Just as he came the first time as the the lamb, the second time he will come as the majestic Lion! But the first time he did not fulfill that, nor has he yet. So all is not fulfilled.
Lulav:But we can see from above from what Peter said, that not all was fulfilled yet, not even our sins being blotted out yet. They have been covered, but not blotted out. There is a difference.

An example of something that Jesus did not fulfill of the prophets because it wasn't directly about him and it was not he who could fulfill it, is this, found in Acts 1, again we see Peter who has the understanding of what his friend and Lord was teaching while he traveled with him day and night for three and a half years. That they needed to attend to fulfilling scripture concerning Judas.
15 And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said , (the number of names together were about an hundred and twenty,) 16 Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have been fulfilled , which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus.

AM:And it was fulfilled, no?

It was fulfilled but not by him or not by him dying on the cross. this is what I've been trying to say. And there are still many things that need to be fulfilled and not until they are all fulfilled with the Torah be destroyed.
Lulav:And we see the Peter realizes that the scripture below needs to be fulfilled regarding this:
For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his habitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein * : and his bishoprick let another take .

Then they choose from among all those who have been eye-witnesses to the L-rds ministry and choose two men. Then with the guidance of the Holy Spirit Mattathias is chosen to replace Judas. Now that scripture in the Psalms is fulfilled.

AM: :thumbsup:
So your point is that not all things were fulfilled "by Jesus on the cross"; that other prophesies still needed to be fulfilled even after the cross.... and even now some remain to be fulfilled?

:thumbsup::amen: Exactly!

I would not disagree with that... but how does that show that THE LAW is not "done away in Christ", just the scriptures so state? What does that have to do with other prophesies being fulfilled or when/how they are fulfilled?

The Torah which many refer to as the Law, still has prophecies in it not fulfilled. What was fulfilled by the crucifixion is that a true spotless lamb, the lamb of G-d promised to come, to Abraham (this is how Abraham saw Jesus day as he speaks of in the Gospel of John) shed his blood, to cover our sins, and our debt to the consequences of breaking the law of G-d was paid. For those who believed of course.
Lulav: But there are many more, in the prophets and also the Torah that have not.

There are many prophecies in the book of Genesis which haven't been fulfilled and we see by the Prophet Isaiah of when they will be.
I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say: My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please. Isa 46:10

AM: So you don't see a difference between "the law" and "prophesies"?

Yes there is a difference, of course but if we are using the measuring stick that Jesus gave to tell us when they would be done away with we can't make a distinction in this case.

As you can see by this quote from Matthew 5 he is grouping them together here speaking of doing away with them. So here he sees them as a unit. Which is true in a sense. There would be no reason for prophets if all was followed in the Torah. Also Jesus is spoken of in both the Torah and the Prophets which does also include the Psalms too.
LULAV:All has not been fulfilled so the Torah has not been dissolved, demolished, or annulled according to the one who wrote it and said this.
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy , but to fulfil . 18 For verily I say unto you, Till * heaven and earth pass , one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till * all be fulfilled .

Destroy = dissolve, demolish, annul.

AM:The fact that not all PROPHESIES have been fulfilled (every tear has not yet been dried, for example... God is not "all in all" for example) wouldn't negate THE LAW OF MOSES from being fulfilled.... it being A SHADOW of BETTER THINGS TO COME (Christ).

Is Christ not come?

He has come once, but promised to come again. At that time all will be fulfilled.

[Can I request, again, that you not put your scriptures in quotes if you want them addressed? Anything in quotes does not carry over when someone replies to your post. You can indent them and get almost the same result as you do when quoting them - just without the "quote" indicator. Obviously you have your own posting style and this is only a request, but it would make it much easier for others to address them. Otherwise they don't stay with the quoted post and you have to go back to get them which you cannot always do if your reply is not on the same page of the thread. Thanks!]

I heard you the first time. :) However this is the way I've always posted to this board. When Erwin was here he had a different quoting system that would put the quotes in a little box. I don't care for this system but have made over 30,000 posts since being a member here for almost 10 years (I had a different account when I joined before, now defunct) and some habits are hard to break. I will try to use the indent feature, but please bear with me while I try to get the hang of it. Once you get past fifty, technical things don't 'click' as quickly as they used to! :)
I hope I have answered your questions and thank you for a lovely discussion. I have to come back to this later however since it's taken me two hours to make this one post and I have to get some work done! :)

Till next time................[/quote]I am very curious lulav if you read post 66? I think it is very on topic and not argumentative.

bugkiller
927154.gif
 
Upvote 0

New_Wineskin

Contributor
Jun 26, 2004
11,145
652
Elizabethtown , PA , usa
✟13,854.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I have tried to reason with some ...

If you attempt to reason and have no intention to understand their attempts to reason , all you will do is start another thread about how you attempted reason and came up empty .

If you do not wish to listen and understand the opposing viewpoint , you can't really say that you "tried to reason with some" .

If your idea of success in your attempts to reason is that people agree with you , then you are not being reasonable . The best you can do in these threads is for you to attempt to have people understand you and for you to attempt to understand them .

There is a chance that people on either side accept and agree with the other side ( or one of the many sides ) and change their stance . However , it is a rare thing in these forums .

Anyway , that is my attempt at reason .
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

nephilimiyr

I've Been Keepin My Eyes Wide Open
Jan 21, 2003
23,432
1,799
60
Wausau Wisconsin
Visit site
✟40,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Me persoanally..I will opt for a good ole fashioned Italian feast anytime!

Great levitically unclean food!

Shrimp scampli,calamari,lobster fra-diavlo,spaghetti with white clam sauce....

And of course,a good meat sauce with pork sausages in it.:yum:
And some baby back ribs to go?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.