SithDoughnut
The Agnostic, Ignostic, Apatheistic Atheist
Nothing wrong with that --- as long as you worship the right One.
QV my last post.
Good job we only have one then.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nothing wrong with that --- as long as you worship the right One.
QV my last post.
isn't the sun a huge fireball?Which is older, sun worship or fire worship?
Read what you just said here slowly, SD.
"Disproving"?
Someone writes an autobiography, and that 'disproves' his existence?
The sun is a measma of incandescent plasma.isn't the sun a huge fireball?
lol... my seven and five year old can sing just about every song to their "Here Comes Science" CD.^^^ That hurt ^^^
lol... my seven and five year old can sing just about every song to their "Here Comes Science" CD.![]()
"If the general theory of a big bang and an ever-expanding universe after that is correct, than what happened before that? Was the universe simply devoid of all matter, and then the matter appeared through means which we cannot fully comprehend, how did that happen? In many cultures, the customary answer is that a god or gods created the universe out of nothing, but if we wish to peruse this question courageously, we must of course ask ourselves the next question: where did god come from?"
If we decide that this is a question that cannot be answered as we will never know the answer, then why not save a step and conclude that the origin of the universe is an unanswerable question? Or, if we say that god always existed, why not save a step and conclude that the universe has always existed, and has no need for a creation - and it was always here?"
That is to say the universe is expanding, and that it's rate of expansion is increasing.
If his character invalidates what he said, what does god's murderous, petty, vengeful, jealous, cruel, and deceiving character say about the Bible? After all YHWH created the devil and allows him to run rampant, allows natural disasters and diseases to horribly, and sometimes, painfully kill millions, he murdered the entire population of humans and land animals on the planet at one point, did horrendously cruel things to Job just to show his superiority to the devil, encouraged wars, had Abraham almost kill his own son just to see if he could, et cetera. Now that I think about it, you are absolutely right. God's character, as portrayed in the Bible, definitely shows that we cannot follow that book for anything regarding morality, science, history, geography, or any other subject for that matter.Was Sagan with his second or third wife when he wrote that?
And was he stoned at the time?
Stoned Progressive Jews come up with lots of interesting ideas. His father may have picked up some wisdom as an usher at the movie house in New York and passed it on to young Carl.
Trust in a deceiving, petty, and malevolent YHWH? I don't think so. Good luck to ya, though. Let me know how that works out for you.Before the Big Bang? Without matter, time doesn't exist so there is no "before". And (scientifically speaking) all theories of "the beginning" start with conditions we can't duplicate. Time not existing for example.
So trusting that God was there, we can trust He has the ability to explain it to us as well. Or not to trust....that's a choice too.
Was Sagan with his second or third wife when he wrote that?
And was he stoned at the time?
Stoned Progressive Jews come up with lots of interesting ideas. His father may have picked up some wisdom as an usher at the movie house in New York and passed it on to young Carl.
Before the Big Bang? Without matter, time doesn't exist so there is no "before". And (scientifically speaking) all theories of "the beginning" start with conditions we can't duplicate. Time not existing for example.
So trusting that God was there, we can trust He has the ability to explain it to us as well. Or not to trust....that's a choice too.
If his character invalidates what he said, what does god's murderous, petty, vengeful, jealous, cruel, and deceiving character say about the Bible? After all YHWH created the devil and allows him to run rampant, allows natural disasters and diseases to horribly, and sometimes, painfully kill millions, he murdered the entire population of humans and land animals on the planet at one point, did horrendously cruel things to Job just to show his superiority to the devil, encouraged wars, had Abraham almost kill his own son just to see if he could, et cetera. Now that I think about it, you are absolutely right. God's character, as portrayed in the Bible, definitely shows that we cannot follow that book for anything regarding morality, science, history, geography, or any other subject for that matter. Let me know how that works out for you.
Your post has been reported for anti Semitic remarks.
All ideas of "creation" start with conditions we cannot duplicate. God existing for example.
So, you're saying that God doesn't allow people to die in horrible ways from diseases, natural disasters and other humans?You are mistaking mans torments for God's character.
That makes two of us! My days are pretty relaxed for the most part. I have a loving wife, a job doing what I like, a great family, good friends, and great health. All without belief in a god. Neither my wife or I are religious or theists, at all. I guess if there's a god out there somewhere, he and I must be in pretty good terms.My days are filled with peace and contentment. What I need is delivered each day.
Good to hear. Curiously, I too get what I need and want but I do it not by prayer but by working for it and it has worked out great.I can set out on the most dangerous adventures with out fear of death and can look evildoers in the eye. God answers my prayers and it has worked out great. Thanks for your interest.![]()
He does. And you haven't figured out why that is.So, you're saying that God doesn't allow people to die in horrible ways from diseases, natural disasters and other humans?
Well, that's arguable, but it's really not relevant to the pre-bang environment. Before* the big bang, the singularity had not exploded, but the singularity was there. It contained all or most of the stuff that makes the universe we know and love today. Maybe it was a super-duper-massive black hole at the center of whatever was there pre-bang. Who knows, the explosion wiped out most, if not all, of the evidence about the pre-bang environment. Which makes all this kinda moot, but fun none-the-less.Before the Big Bang? Without matter, time doesn't exist so there is no "before".
And attacking Carl Sagen. Everyone has their hobbies.My days are filled with peace and contentment.
Well, it's because he's cruel, impotent, or he simply doesn't exist. I'm betting on the last option.He does. And you haven't figured out why that is.
Sickening.not making light at all....Carl is the from the same camp
Personally I don't find your comparison compelling at all... I would hope you would see that people who are cheered by Sagan's optimistic view of the cosmos would be as insulted by a comparison to........