Ask a physicist anything.

Status
Not open for further replies.

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,850,664
51,417
Guam
✟4,896,395.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm enjoying these physics-related threads so...

Ask a physicist anything :).
I can't for the life of me think of the name of that law that is broken by the Trinity.

Is it the Law of Non-contradiction, or what?
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟31,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I can't for the life of me think of the name of that law that is broken by the Trinity.

Is it the Law of Non-contradiction, or what?
It breaks the definition of equality (namely, it violates the reflexive property, "A=B=C, but A=/=C"), so yea, I'd say Non-Contradiction.

Is glass a solid or a liquid?

I've read that it is an amorphous solid, and I've read that it is a liquid.
Depends on how you define the terms, but it's a solid. It's an urban legend that it's a just very viscous liquid, and some people even point to medieval glass that bulges at the bottom. Truth is, that was just the style at the time.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
38
London
✟30,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I can't for the life of me think of the name of that law that is broken by the Trinity.

Is it the Law of Non-contradiction, or what?

Maybe we need to make an Ask A Philosopher thread? Not sure how this applies to physicists so much, although it's not that we don't come up against philosophy occasionally.

Although surely to invoke that law, we would need to be able to fully explain what the trinity is? Just because we can't explain something doesn't mean that non-contradiction is involved per se.

It this new mole that appeared on my back cancerous?

Am I weird because I bop along to the LHC rap song?

And if the LHC does not find a Higgs-Boson what is next?

Get it checked; hell no; a major shakeup, somewhat akin to when quantum mechanics came along in the 20's.

Is glass a solid or a liquid?

I've read that it is an amorphous solid, and I've read that it is a liquid.

(This is only from a quick wiki skim-read, I don't claim to be an expert on this, but...)

It's an amorphous solid. Old glass appears thicker at one end because old glassmaking techniques often involved spinning it, essentially.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟31,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
It this new mole that appeared on my back cancerous?
It's a sign from God to go to your GP.

Am I weird because I bop along to the LHC rap song?
Yes, most definitely.

And if the LHC does not find a Higgs-Boson what is next?
The scientists at CERN have a backup plan: we give helicopters cancer.

large_hadron_collider.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: IzzyPop
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟31,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
(This is only from a quick wiki skim-read, I don't claim to be an expert on this, but...)

It's an amorphous solid. Old glass appears thicker at one end because old glassmaking techniques often involved spinning it, essentially.
Urban legend is... urban :p. You made me doubt myself, so I invoke the mighty powers of the Straight Dope. Who weren't too helpful. But these sources were :).

Basically, it's an amorphous solid, in that it has no well-defined melting point. It's molecules are arranged as if they were liquid, but they don't move, like a solid. So it's a solidy liquidy blur.

For all intents and purposes, though, it's a solid. It's hard and shatters when I hit it.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
38
London
✟30,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Urban legend is... urban :p. You made me doubt myself, so I invoke the mighty powers of the Straight Dope. Who weren't too helpful. But these sources were :).

Basically, it's an amorphous solid, in that it has no well-defined melting point. It's molecules are arranged as if they were liquid, but they don't move, like a solid. So it's a solidy liquidy blur.

For all intents and purposes, though, it's a solid. It's hard and shatters when I hit it.

Why did I make you doubt yourself? We arrived at the same answer :p
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
38
London
✟30,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
1. Why do stagecoach wheels turn backwards in movies?

Our eyes can't keep up with the speed of rotation - us seeing the wheel appear to slow down and change direction is our eyes lagging what's really happening.

2. Does a vacuum cleaner work in a vacuum?

Depends if you want to dump stuff into the vacuum or not. :p
 
Upvote 0

thaumaturgy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
7,541
882
✟12,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It's a sign from God to go to your GP.


Yes, most definitely.


The scientists at CERN have a backup plan: we give helicopters cancer.

large_hadron_collider.png

Mad props to XKCD!!!!

(I spent a few years as a graphic artist --not necessarily a good artist-- but usually I detest comics with such bad artwork, but for XKCD I make an exception. It is good.)
 
Upvote 0

thaumaturgy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
7,541
882
✟12,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Our eyes can't keep up with the speed of rotation - us seeing the wheel appear to slow down and change direction is our eyes lagging what's really happening.

Isn't it also a relic of the "sampling rate" of the film? At something like 24fps it's like strobing a water droplet at the wrong frequency and it looks like its running backwards. Am I completely off on this?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,850,664
51,417
Guam
✟4,896,395.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Our eyes can't keep up with the speed of rotation - us seeing the wheel appear to slow down and change direction is our eyes lagging what's really happening.
Not according to What Einstein Told His Barber, by Robert L. Wolke.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
38
London
✟30,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Isn't it also a relic of the "sampling rate" of the film? At something like 24fps it's like strobing a water droplet at the wrong frequency and it looks like its running backwards. Am I completely off on this?

True - although I think that's the same thing but with different numbers.

Not according to What Einstein Told His Barber, by Robert L. Wolke.

Great. Which was?
 
Upvote 0

thaumaturgy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
7,541
882
✟12,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Urban legend is... urban :p. You made me doubt myself, so I invoke the mighty powers of the Straight Dope. Who weren't too helpful. But these sources were :).

Basically, it's an amorphous solid, in that it has no well-defined melting point. It's molecules are arranged as if they were liquid, but they don't move, like a solid. So it's a solidy liquidy blur.

For all intents and purposes, though, it's a solid. It's hard and shatters when I hit it.

This truly is one of those "great questions". It defies an easy answer.

Here's a link to a discussion of the thermodynamics of glass. (LINKY)

Essentially unlike most crystalline solids in which there is a distinct "melting point" and what is called a first order phase transition as it cools and it doesn't appear to have a "latent heat of fusion" so, many take that to mean it is a supercooled liquid, however there is a second order phase transition which marks other changes in physical features at a certain temperature.

In essence it has a "glass transition temperature", like some polymers. But it goes into an amorphous (ie non-crystalline) phase, but this can affected by the rate of cooling.

The Liquid-->Crystal transition is thermodynamic. It is a change to more energetically stable condition.

The Glass Transition is kinetic. It is not necessarily energetically favorable enough to keep the molecules from continued movement. From what I can gather it isn't a "potential well" where the stable configuration is a hinderance to further molecular movement.

In things like volcanic glasses (obsidian) there are "devitrification" events. You see some crystalline phases form within the glass.

Sounds like this is still a debatable point as to how to correctly classify glass, but it is largely a semantic argument. There are thermodynamic and materials science justifications for a variety of approaches to this question.

As for the ancient window glass. Apparently it has not flowed. That is, as you guys have said, a relic of the glassmaking art of the time (Crown Glass method which winds up with a "spinning step" resulting in thicker bottoms).

Today we apparently use a "float glass" technique which generates nice flat panes.

Summary: You can ask a physicist anything but it takes a chemist to really muck up the waters!
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,850,664
51,417
Guam
✟4,896,395.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Great. Which was?
I'll see if I can explain this w/o quoting the book itself.

It has to do with camera speed.

Say you had a wheel with only one spoke (humor me here for a sec).

The camera snaps when the spoke is at 12:00, then again when the spoke advances to 11:00, 10:00, etc.

Creating the optical illusion that the wheel is turning backwards.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
38
London
✟30,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Is their a simple way to explain spin of sub atomic particles ?

Not according to everyday experience as such - spin is a uniquely and completely quantum effect. Often it applies to things with no apparent internal structure like electrons.*

*That said, I know of a few experiments that would eventually lead to an investigation of whether this was really the case.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
38
London
✟30,012.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I'll see if I can explain this w/o quoting the book itself.

It has to do with camera speed.

Say you had a wheel with only one spoke (humor me here for a sec).

The camera snaps when the spoke is at 12:00, then again when the spoke advances to 11:00, 10:00, etc.

Creating the optical illusion that the wheel is turning backwards.

Ok, thanks. Maybe I didn't describe it well it enough but as I said to thaum, that does sound like the same thing as the eye but with different numbers involved (i.e. a camera's sample rate isn't going to be the same as that of the human eye per se).
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.