Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
calluna said:All and sundry quote Matthew and throw in their own perversions.
So you don't know where the church is, or you can't say where it is.So you don't like Matthew? What perversion have I thrown in?
So you don't know where the church is, or you can't say where it is.
Eph 5:23 For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior.
1Co 12:27 Now you are the body of Christ and individually members of it.
Thus, whe are the church
poor uzzah.
in trying to do well (2 sam 6:6-8) he
invokes the wrath of god.
was this fair?
That refers to church as a body of all believers, not as an institution. Check your Greek.Matthew 16:15-19 He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" 16 Simon Peter answered and said, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." 17 Jesus answered and said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. 18 "And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. 19 "And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven."
Romans 12:3-9 For I say, through the grace given to me, to everyone who is among you, not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think soberly, as God has dealt to each one a measure of faith. 4 For as we have many members in one body, but all the members do not have the same function, 5 so we, being many, are one body in Christ, and individually members of one another. 6 Having then gifts differing according to the grace that is given to us, let us use them: if prophecy, let us prophesy in proportion to our faith; 7 or ministry, let us use it in our ministering; he who teaches, in teaching; 8 he who exhorts, in exhortation; he who gives, with liberality; he who leads, with diligence; he who shows mercy, with cheerfulness. 9 Let love be without hypocrisy. Abhor what is evil. Cling to what is good.
Ephesians 5:23-27 For the husband is head of the wife, as also Christ is head of the church; and He is the Savior of the body. 24 Therefore, just as the church is subject to Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything. 25 Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her, 26 that He might sanctify and cleanse her with the washing of water by the word, 27 that He might present her to Himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle or any such thing, but that she should be holy and without blemish.
1 Corinthians 12:28-31 And God has appointed these in the church: first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, varieties of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Are all workers of miracles? 30 Do all have gifts of healings? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? 31 But earnestly desire the best gifts. And yet I show you a more excellent way.
Pentecost can and has rightly been thought of as the birthday of the church but in a certain sense the church began on Good Friday when the side of Christ was pierced and blood and water flowed out of it.
I will remind you that Peter also started the conversions after Pentecost- 3000 people. So yes, he is the foundation of the body of Christ. Not an institution.The Scriptures speak of the "church" in a couple of different but related senses. Sometimes the Scriptures speak of the church as being composed of all believers of every age and sometimes the Bible speaks about the church as a local assembly composed of both believers and unbelievers. Those who come to be a part of the church of every age do so because of the faith that they have learned from the visible church which has both believers and unbelievers in it. If you attend something that calls itself a church you can know you are at a Christian church if the Gospel is proclaimed--Christ-crucified and if the sacraments (baptism and the Lord's Supper) are administered.
Matthew 16:15-19 He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?" Simon Peter answered and said, "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God." Jesus answered and said to him, "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah, for flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven. "And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. "And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven."
In this passage Peter is given the keys because of his confession that Jesus is the Christ. He is the first to receive the keys, the other apostles receive the keys after the resurrection. Jesus promised to build his church on the office of the keys/ministry of Peter. Jesus builds his church by sending ministers who know, preach, and confess that Jesus is the Christ the Son of the living God.
godschild said:That refers to church as a body of all believers, not as an institution. Check your Greek.
With institutions comes discord. That's the difference between an assembly and an institution. Another big difference is the elders of that day were not as arrogant in thinking they had all the answers. It's a nice sharp contrast to what you see today. We are meant to be a body, not an institution.It is a matter of interpretation, not a matter of word studies. The word has to do with an assembly. An assembly is something that can be seen. The Scriptures speak of various people given various gifts to serve in the body of Christ and as long as two or more people are involved in this some type of institution will inevitably develop so that things are done decenly and in good order. We find this in the New Testament with the appointment of elders and deacons. People weren't just running about all claiming to be Christians and thinking independently from one another. The concept of institution itself is neither good nor bad. Problems come into play when the main goal is preservation of the institution at all costs. But the only alternative to institution is for a person to sit in his room by himself and lock the door which isn't Scriptural either.
godschild said:With institutions comes discord. That's the difference between an assembly and an institution. Another big difference is the elders of that day were not as arrogant in thinking they had all the answers. It's a nice sharp contrast to what you see today. We are meant to be a body, not an institution.
So just because I believe different things about the church, biblically based, you assume I'm reading a different Bible? There were FAR less divisions in the early church, and the early church was not made up of millions of buildings with hundreds of different worship styles. It certainly did not debate whether or not homosexual sex is sin, and it also did not debate whether or not everyone went to heaven. Within Christianity today we have thousands of cliques due to the denominational differences between people and for no better reason. That is NOT the church as Jesus intends it.An assembly is a type of institution and if you think that there were no divisions or discord in the early church I think you are reading a different Bible than I am. The church is simultaneously both saint and sinner because those within it are both saint and sinner.
Godschild said:So just because I believe different things about the church, biblically based, you assume I'm reading a different Bible? There were FAR less divisions in the early church, and the early church was not made up of millions of buildings with hundreds of different worship styles. It certainly did not debate whether or not homosexual sex is sin, and it also did not debate whether or not everyone went to heaven. Within Christianity today we have thousands of cliques due to the denominational differences between people and for no better reason. That is NOT the church as Jesus intends it.
I am not talking about whether or not we should return to one form of worship. I am talking about said preferences dividing people.I agree that the church should return to the ancient forms of worship found in Lutheran, Roman Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox churches. I also agree that the homosexuality debate was not an issue.
Which died after Peter preached to the Roman officer and had the meeting. It was not nearly as divisive for nearly as long as the other issues I cited.However, in the early church you did have the circumcision party that taught that you had to be circumcised in order to be a Christian.
Nor was it as divided as now, with the number of different "churches" we have today.There were people teaching that the Old Testament law had to be obeyed for salvation. You also had the toleration in some churches of someone who was having sexual relations with his step-mother. There was real idolatry taking place. You had people claiming that Jesus had already returned. You had people who had bizarre interpretations of the law and geneologies of the Old Testament. None of these things are the church as Jesus intended it either.
And neither can they be solved by strictly adhering to them. This world is changing, and for a change we might start changing with it to reach more people.None of our current problems can be remedied simply by doing away with institutional terms. That's to miss the point entirely.
Forget the bloody sacraments, forget preaching. This world does NOT need it. It needs people who are willing to love them where they are at but still hold firm to morality and the message of the gospel. It needs discipleship, which, if you recall, was what Jesus commanded us to do. That requires people to be people and not be an institution.If we determine to not join any institution where sin is taking place then we better not join either or there will be sin taking place. What we need to ask ourselves to determine if we are in a Christian assembly is, "Is the Gospel of Christ crucified being preached?" and "Are the sacraments being administered?" The whole idea of whether there is a building is irrelevant. If there are furnishings in the building which point us to Christ that is good but they are not the point.
godschild said:Forget the bloody sacraments, forget preaching. This world does NOT need it. It needs people who are willing to love them where they are at but still hold firm to morality and the message of the gospel. It needs discipleship, which, if you recall, was what Jesus commanded us to do. That requires people to be people and not be an institution.
Straw man argument is not going to win you this discussion.I don't why you hate His good gifts so much.
No, Jesus did not say that. Jesus said that love proves us to be disciples (John 15). Baptism is NOT a requirement, it's symbolic of an inner change. See Romans 6. The inner change can take place without giving the symbol for it, so long as the symbol is understood.Jesus said that disciples are made through baptism.
Preaching? Did you not get my point about discipleship? Our goal should never be to convert people, it should be to make disciples. This involves relationships, which are not possible if you go around telling people they have to be baptized.Why should I listen to you instead of Him? Do you think you know what the world needs better than He does? And it is through the foolishness of preaching that God has determined to save people.
The 'sacraments' you have 'cited' do not come from Jesus, but from a narrow reading of Scripture. The Bible is meant to be taken as a whole, not chopped up into little packages called sacraments. The whole of the message is love, noncondemnation, and justice. Not Pharisaical legalism that is implied by your sacraments. I firmly and wholeheartedly reject anything that even turns people's noses away. As Paul said, "I have become all things to all men so that by all means I might save some." I intend to live that out, don't you? But you can't do that if you're not willing to bend a little. In other words, the nonessentials can stay on the sidelines for a bit until they're ready. Then you can bring them into the game. If you fail to do that, you end the game too early and get more bitterness and dejected ex-Christians.These are not my bloody sacraments. They are sacraments given by Jesus for you.
Christianity is not a religion, sir, it is a relationship, and relationships are hindered by legalism.Just teaching some kind of moral code is not Christianity--it is every religion but Christianity.
Jesus did not preach the Law. Jesus preached repentance- turning away from sinful attitudes as well as sinful actions. He also preached forgiveness and mercy.People can become Muslims or Buddhists if all they want is a moral code. Jesus preached the law to people severely to show them that they were completely incapable of keeping it.
He also takes forgiveness very seriously:He took the law seriously.
Jesus shows that only His death can fulfill the law.He shows us that only He can fulfill the law.
No I do not. I throw out the very thing keeping people from Christ. Now, if I throw out His death, yes, I throw out everything Christ gave us- eternal life.Because of our love for Him and what He has done for us we strive to keep the law for the good of our neighbor. But none of this does away with the sacraments. If you are going to throw out the sacraments and the preaching you throw away everything that Christ gave us.
godschild said:No, Jesus did not say that. Jesus said that love proves us to be disciples (John 15). Baptism is NOT a requirement, it's symbolic of an inner change.
godschild said:The 'sacraments' you have 'cited' do not come from Jesus, but from a narrow reading of Scripture. The Bible is meant to be taken as a whole, not chopped up into little packages called sacraments. The whole of the message is love, noncondemnation, and justice. Not Pharisaical legalism that is implied by your sacraments.
godschild said:No I do not. I throw out the very thing keeping people from Christ. Now, if I throw out His death, yes, I throw out everything Christ gave us- eternal life.
Why do you think I hate concepts like confirmation? Do answer that to the best of your ability.
Why do you think I abandoned Lutheran teachings? Do answer that also to the best of your ability.