Pope: Saving world from homosexuality like saving rainforests

[bsd13]

I'm on your "side," but I'd like the chapter and verse for the next time someone uses the infamous "shellfish" argument.

Acts 10:9-16, 28

In verse 28 Peter is talking about how they aren't to allow divisions between the Jewish Christians and the Gentile Christians. Some take it to mean that God has opened up everything as "legal" for a man to do and it will never make him impure.

 

[b&wpac4]

Those restrictions (food) do not exist. If you had ever picked up a Bible you'd know this. God struck down the dietary laws. I can give you the chapter and verse so you can look it up yourself.

He however did NOT strike down the law about homosexuality (or many others). I've already shown you that passage. Now if you can show me one where He has go for it.

Should we then put them to death, since that was the law?

You can't have it all ways.

 

[angellica]

Techniques and positions can apply to anyone.

Without getting too graphic, gays use different techniques than heteros. Try telling a lesbian couple that they can benefit from learning about the missionary style. I'm pretty sure that they have something missing that's required for that position to work.

 

[bsd13]

The territory around her? lol There is no need to twist your words. Your all-around ignorance provides more than enough stunners that don't require my input for entertainment value.

Yes spelling errors show ignorance. Hear that OphidiaPhile?

 

[angellica]

Acts 10:9-16, 28

In verse 28 Peter is talking about how they aren't to allow divisions between the Jewish Christians and the Gentile Christians. Some take it to mean that God has opened up everything as "legal" for a man to do and it will never make him impure.

Thank you!

 

[Aianna]

Without getting too graphic, gays use different techniques than heteros. Try telling a lesbian couple that they can benefit from learning about the missionary style. I'm pretty sure that they have something missing that's required for that position to work.

Without getting too graphic, they can make it work with peripherals.

 

[Braunwyn]

So you agree that same sex "sex" is wrong?

No, I don't consider that kind of sex to be wrong. Frankly, sex between two uneducated ignoramouses gives me the willies. That's what I take issue with.

 

[bsd13]

Should we then put them to death, since that was the law?

You can't have it all ways.

Nope, God took the right to punish for breaking His laws out of our hands when He was nailed to the cross.

Leave room for the wrath of God. It is His to avenge, He will repay.

 

[angellica]

The territory around her? lol There is no need to twist your words. Your all-around ignorance provides more than enough stunners that don't require my input for entertainment value.

This sounds more like a personal attack than a valid argument.

 

[OphidiaPhile]

Is that based on any religious belief? Or is it based on our current legal definition of who can give consent?

It is based on sex, nothing more or less. I have no religious beliefs.

 

[b&wpac4]

Nope, God took the right to punish for breaking His laws out of our hands when He was nailed to the cross.

Leave room for the wrath of God. It is His to avenge, He will repay.

Then why do you fight against homosexual rights in this country?

 

[OphidiaPhile]

Without getting too graphic, gays use different techniques than heteros. Try telling a lesbian couple that they can benefit from learning about the missionary style. I'm pretty sure that they have something missing that's required for that position to work.

I talk often and at length with Lesbians I know about tongue techniques and there are toys that strap on to solve the problem you bring up.

 

[angellica]

Without getting too graphic, they can make it work with peripherals.

I'm not talking about using toys and such, I'm talking about natural sex with no man-made objects helping. If you use man-made objects, aren't you really making love to the object instead of the person? After all, the object is giving you the pleasure, not the person. Could it be that the person lacks something that the other needs to feel the pleasure that they turn to an object for?

 

[OphidiaPhile]

Yes spelling errors show ignorance. Hear that OphidiaPhile?

And what spelling errors would you be referring to?

 

[angellica]

I talk often and at length with Lesbians I know about tongue techniques and there are toys that strap on to solve the problem you bring up.

So it's not really them, they have to use fake body parts. Tongue techniques have no basis in the missionary style anyway, which was my point of how not everyone can benefit from learning other people's techniques. TMI!!

Why in the world would you talk to them at length about tongue techniques anyway?

 

[Braunwyn]

Yes spelling errors show ignorance. Hear that OphidiaPhile?

Spelling errors? Where did I mention spelling errors? Or where does my post contain a spelling error. I'm not using word.

 

[angellica]

It is based on sex, nothing more or less. I have no religious beliefs.

I mean the consent part, who can consent? Is your basis of consent based on the current legal definition of who can give consent?

 

[OphidiaPhile]

I mean the consent part, who can consent? Is your basis of consent based on the current legal definition of who can give consent?

No, I also believe that underage teens can consent to other underage teens.

 

[Aianna]

I'm not talking about using toys and such, I'm talking about natural sex with no man-made objects helping. If you use man-made objects, aren't you really making love to the object instead of the person? After all, the object is giving you the pleasure, not the person. Could it be that the person lacks something that the other needs to feel the pleasure that they turn to an object for?

No, you're not making love to the object. The object doesn't "work" itself; the people are still preforming the act that is the source of pleasure. Heterosexual couples use such peripherals quite often as well despite having "something."

The objects allow for new ways to express oneself to a partner for people of all sexual orientations.

 

[Braunwyn]

This sounds more like a personal attack than a valid argument.

Obviously, it's not an arugment. I'm noting reality. If you're a YEC, you're ignorant.