- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,307
- 52,682
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
A very specific question for evolutionists.
- Thread starter AV1611VET
- Start date
M
Mikepar
Guest
That is a question for theologians not evolutionists. Its kind of like the question, how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. Meaningless.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,307
- 52,682
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
M
Mikepar
Guest
I think even a ,Theological Evolutionist, would be hard pressed to answer that one.Hi, Mike --- nice to meet you ---
Ever heard of a Theological Evolutionist?
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,307
- 52,682
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
CACTUSJACKmankin
Scientist
cocker spaniels descended from dogs who descended from other dogs. Only after a few tens of millenia worth of generations do you get to grey wolves. our species is i think 100,000 years so it's hundreds of thousands of generations before we can be traced to a non-homo sapien ancestral population.
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,307
- 52,682
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,307
- 52,682
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,307
- 52,682
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
If these are the answers you guys want me to accept --- then I shall stick to my original assumption that evolution dictates that the very first woman ever born [from whatever she came from] would have to engage either in beastiality or incest or both --- (this is a gross subject).
Upvote
0
M
Mikepar
Guest
Come off it AV, after reading some of the posts on this forum you must know that is not the way evolution works.
You may not like or agree with the theory of evolution, but at the very least try to understand the theory.
Seems to me that you are not looking for a discussion but an argument
Upvote
0
Well for ONE thing, considering that evolutionists don't deal with mythological religious figures it's a pretty silly question.
Upvote
0
pgp_protector
Noted strange person
- Dec 17, 2003
- 51,901
- 17,803
- 57
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Widowed
- Politics
- US-Others
Well given that According to a Literal Interpretation of Genesis Incest was the design for human population..
Upvote
0
MoonLancer
The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
are you suggesting that a whole bunch of apes gave birth to a human? Thier likely was not ever a clear cut human, and a clear cut ape (i know humans are apes, i just dont know the right word)
The transition is more like a grey scale. each step of grey looks nearly identical to the last with almost no change, but given thousands of steps, we can easily compare the two greys from now to a thousand steps ago.
Upvote
0
MoonLancer
The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
yeah, where does the bible get off thinking incest babies are ok? its sick gross and immoral.
Upvote
0
Athrond
Regular Member
I don't see why you need to construct a straw man like this AV. I think you know well what "evolutionists" theories would say on this matter.
According to evolution it is impossible to single out one "first woman" like that because the lineage from one species to the next is so gradual.
Come to think about it there would have had to be a massive amount of incest in your version of the story - if you assume that it all started from just two people...which as you say, is a gross subject.
Athrond
Upvote
0
Split Rock
Conflation of Blathers
Technically, Australopithecus is a genus, not a species, though it was ancesteral to H. sapiens. Our closest ancestor would likely be H. erectus, or H. ergaster.
Does that answer your question, AVET?
Upvote
0
- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,307
- 52,682
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Thank you, Split Rock --- at least I have something to work with now.
Let's assume Homo ergaster.
So now my question is --- according to evolutionary logic, if Homo ergaster gave birth to a Homo sapien girl, wouldn't this girl eventually have mated with a Homo ergaster? Or is it that all of a sudden, Homo ergasters started giving birth to Homo sapiens, who then mated with each other?
Upvote
0
Similar threads
