Alternate Republican Safer House

[RealDealNeverstop]

Like I said... I'm not a magician and if there is ignorance coming into the thread, then let the attempts to lay claim over someone else's posts and in contradiction to the clarity given be the robes of shame. I broke it down real small for any reasonable mistaken inference. If it needs breaking down more, the lost are always free to go somewhere else and ask it to be explained.

Here is what was posted:

This just in...A son of Memphis Democrat Representative is responsible for invading the privacy of Sarah Palin.

Also here...Now who would have thought that the trail would lead somehow to the Democrats? (Rhetorical)

There is no mind reading at all but only reading what was posted. The ONLY reference to the loser who hacked was to point out he is the son of an elected Dem followed by the statement the trail lead to "...the Democrats."

There was no distinction between the one idiot and Democrats as a group. This is clear and exactly why there was no response to my points but simply a regurgitation of obfuscation through a veiled attempt to blame the readers for...reading the post.

In fact, you might want to pay more attention to your own posting and consider how it applies to your posts:

The first quote is irrelevent as demonstrated above.

The second quote is pure, flat-out dishonesty as my sentence was chopped in half to change the meaning. So on top of accusing other posts of being intellectually dishonest, that tries to be defended partially by practicing dishonesty in purposefully misquoting a different post.

But, there is no secret about the unspoken pact. The one that basically means posts aren't held accountable no matter how obvious it is when a claim is wrong. See, when Criminology and I pointed out the broad brushing against Dems as a group we didn't do it to defend Dems, but on the principle of integrity and intellectual honesty. It's no different than when peeps tried to claim Palin said she would take us to war with Russia while ignoring the hypothetical question and her full answer. I jumped on posts that twisted her words. Obviously I don't support her so iam just using that as an example of what it means to go by principles versus personalities. That is why I can get along with most groups because I don't let peer pressure guide my views. If I see a dishonest claim on anyone or any group I call it out even if I personally have no respect for said parties. Color me magenta but it seems pretty simple.

 

[GQ Chris]

Oh... btw, RDNS.
You could always put me on ignore.

Must be them darn Ralph Nader/Bob Barr supporters throwing a wrench in the entire operation...

 

[ChristianCenturion]

There is no mind reading at all but only reading what was posted...

Never let it be said that I'm not willing to be patient when ignorance keeps insisting it is truth. Here is what the visiting socially liberal came in and claimed:

The guy happened to be a democrat, it doesn't mean the democrats ordered him to do what he did.

Too bad Criminology can't quote where I said democrats ordered him to invade Mrs. Palin's privacy.

Oh, and let's look at your claim:

His response was appropriate because there was a claim about Democrats as a group instead of respecting the fact it was one loser who should be convicted. No action of a single person can define groups with tens of millions of members.

Care to produce your elusive proof required that shows only one individual is responsible for all the events as opposed to more than one person?
If not, then I will continue to be less than shocked that the events lead to the democrats. Buh-bye

Obviously I don't support her...

Oh dear... I find myself less than shocked... again.

 

[ChristianCenturion]

Let's have a happy moment for those that come into the Alternate Republican Safer House to declare "they aren't supporting the Republican candidates".

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_KL8jwDxyY

 

[GQ Chris]

Lol

 

[HerbieHeadley]

Great Vid! Reminds me of the old days....Good Times.

 

[GQ Chris]

You notice the men are saying what they weighed when and the women aren't saying anything about that.

that reminds me, weighed myself at the boxing gym for the first time in like 4 years, 171 lbs.

I left active duty in 1997 and have never completely let myself go. I used to be one of those meathead dudes that would spend all their waking hours lifting weights, I don't do that anymore. Fitness for me now is Cardio and being able to Punch someone in the Head as hard as I can, its a dangerous world out there and you never know when you'll need to do that.

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

Never let it be said that I'm not willing to be patient when ignorance keeps insisting it is truth. Here is what the visiting socially liberal came in and claimed:

Lovely. Classy.

Too bad Criminology can't quote where I said democrats ordered him to invade Mrs. Palin's privacy.

The "ordered" part was clearly sarcasm in response to Dems as a whole being blamed.

Oh, and let's look at your claim:

Can't respond to this until my posts have been quoted in full with honesty without editing.

Care to produce your elusive proof required that shows only one individual is responsible for all the events as opposed to more than one person?
If not, then I will continue to be less than shocked that the events lead to the democrats. Buh-bye

NOW THIS IS ABSOLUTELY PRICELESS! ROTFLMBO!!!!!!!

You already posted TWO links showing one person was responsible for hacking her email:

This just in...A son of Memphis Democrat Representative is responsible for invading the privacy of Sarah Palin.Also here...Now who would have thought that the trail would lead somehow to the Democrats? (Rhetorical)

The first link says on the post one person is responsible and here is the title of the second link:

"All signs point to state rep’s son as Palin ‘hacker.’"

Then there is a demand I provide negative evidence to show it wasn't more than one person responsible? Lol

But, this is what I find terribly condescending and purposefully deceptive. There was an attempt to move the goal posts by saying "...for all the events as opposed to more than one person." Post 2545 is talking ONLY about the email being hacked and nothing else. Here we see a sad attempt to play games because I have no doubt the purpose of saying "all the events" instead of sticking to the original post pointing out ONLY the hacking is to further obfuscate the fact Criminology and I have pwned the poorly based claim of the hacking leading to "...the Democrats."

There is nothing else to be said on the matter from my end. This could have been avoided by simply retracting the claim against Democrats as a group was somehow responsible but noooooooooooo......we can't have that! So let's play word games, throw out some digs, and hope enough garbage is slung to hide the embarrassing fact a claim against an entire group was made when it was only the actions of one person...as proven by your own links. God Bless. And again.

 

[ChristianCenturion]

Post 2545 is talking ONLY about the email being hacked and nothing else...

Still might want to stick to heeding your own posts:

Mind reading is not a profession.

See... here is my post - post 2545.

Yeah Ginny, it doesn't take much catching up to see what has been going on lately.


This just in...

A son of Memphis Democrat Representative is responsible for invading the privacy of Sarah Palin.

Also here...

Now who would have thought that the trail would lead somehow to the Democrats? (Rhetorical)

The trouble you seem to have now is that you can't quote where I limited the situation to ONLY email and absolutely nothing else should be even remotely considered. That specific limitation would be your words, not mine. Your welcome, I'm happy to point out the obvious to you.
And I seem to see where ONLY you have so far tried to claim that one person and only one person is responsible for the entire development... invading, disseminating, etc... without any other person's help.

Just in case you missed it:

Mind reading is not a profession.

Buh-bye

 

[ChristianCenturion]

A classic:

A woman in a hot air balloon realizes she is lost. She
lowers her altitude and spots a man fishing from a
boat below.
She shouts to him, 'Excuse me, can you help me? I
promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I
don't know where I am.'

The man consults his portable GPS and replies, 'You're
in a hot air balloon, approximately 30 feet above a
ground elevation of 2346 feet above sea level. You are
at 31 degrees, 14.97 minutes north latitude and 100
degrees, 49.09 minutes west longitude.

She rolls her eyes and says, 'You must be a
Republican!'

'I am,' replies the man. 'How did you know?'

'Well,' answers the balloonist, 'everything you tell
me is technically correct, but I have no idea what to
do with your information, and I'm still lost. Frankly,
you're not much help to me.'

The man smiles and responds, 'You must be a Democrat.'

'I am,' replies the balloonist. 'How did you know?'

'Well,' says the man, 'You don't know where you are or
where you're going. You've risen to where you are, due
to a large quantity of hot air. You made a promise
that you have no idea how to keep, and now you expect
me to solve your problem. You're in exactly the same
position you were in before we met, but, somehow,
now it's my fault.

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

Still might want to stick to heeding your own posts:


See... here is my post - post 2545.



The trouble you seem to have now is that you can't quote where I limited the situation to ONLY email and absolutely nothing else should be even remotely considered. That specific limitation would be your words, not mine. Your welcome, I'm happy to point out the obvious to you.
And I seem to see where ONLY you have so far tried to claim that one person and only one person is responsible for the entire development... invading, disseminating, etc... without any other person's help.

Just in case you missed it:


Buh-bye

Rotfl! Rinse and repeat. Rinse and repeat. Looks like frustration......the post linked two articles focused on a single point: the man responsible for hacking Palin's email was the son of a Dem followed by the comment it was not surprising the trail led to "...the Democrats." But we are supposed to ignore the obvious and buy into this garbage of "My post blah blah blah..."

Lol...peeps can't be forced to admitting a mistake but ironically the pride preventing the admission glows like Chernobyl in a snow globe.

Every post that tries to spin the slander only digs the hole deeper....

 

[ChristianCenturion]

Rotfl! Rinse and repeat. Rinse and repeat. Looks like frustration......the post linked two articles focused on a single point: the man responsible for hacking Palin's email was the son of a Dem followed by the comment it was not surprising the trail led to "...the Democrats." But we are supposed to ignore the obvious and buy into this garbage of "My post blah blah blah..."

Lol...peeps can't be forced to admitting a mistake but ironically the pride preventing the admission glows like Chernobyl in a snow globe.

Every post that tries to spin the slander only digs the hole deeper....

The simple fact that I post as a social conservative republican in this socially conservative republican thread and two people with a known history of certain behavior come in and try inserting their words into my post that was never addressed to them might be entertaining, but we've all seen it many times before. It gets boring after a bit. If you can't comprehend my post and you feel a need to argue against your own words, feel free to cut out the middle man and put me on ignore. No sense in risking your actions being seen as baiting, harassment, flaming, trolling, or simply trying to get the republican thread, the one that doesn't need to be stickied and has regular fellowship, shut down.

 

[JustOneWay]

Yeah Ginny, it doesn't take much catching up to see what has been going on lately.


This just in...

A son of Memphis Democrat Representative is responsible for invading the privacy of Sarah Palin.

Also here...

Now who would have thought that the trail would lead somehow to a Democrat? (Rhetorical)

There.

I fixed it for you

Now there is no need for the bickering

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

The simple fact that I post as a social conservative republican in this socially conservative republican thread and two people with a known history of certain behavior come in and try inserting their words into my post that was never addressed to them might be entertaining, but we've all seen it many times before. It gets boring after a bit. If you can't comprehend my post and you feel a need to argue against your own words, feel free to cut out the middle man and put me on ignore. No sense in risking your actions being seen as baiting, harassment, flaming, trolling, or simply trying to get the republican thread, the one that doesn't need to be stickied and has regular fellowship, shut down.

Rotfl! The ever present fail safe move! Lol...unfortunately nobody put words into the post that blamed the Democrats for one idiot's criminal actions of hacking an email account. See, no matter how many attempts of distraction are made, I've got truth and the facts on my side. Why? I pay more attention to the contents of posts versus the posters. As far as "fellowship" goes iam pretty confident accountability is a pillar of Christian fellowship. Or does it make the convo a bit queasy to bring up Jesus? When false claims are made about a person or group there should be no hesitation on the part of any Christian to bring those false charges to light. But go ahead and point out I don't agree with the extreme Christian right about abortion and gay marriage...hopefully if that gets repeated enough some peeps will forget the post that blamed "...the Democrats" for the actions of one idiot. Most of the evidence I've presented has been ignored in lieu of a lot of hot air.

Iam still going on this to demonstrate the point this isn't about fellowship. It's about wanting to slam others without having that annoying aspect of being held responsible for the contents of posts. I make the energizer bunny look like a moldy couch potatoe.

 

[ChristianCenturion]

There.

I fixed it for you

Now there is no need for the bickering

Hehe...
Yes, I knew the fixation and squirming demonstrated was in zealot overreaction to my using a generalized "... the democrats". But the assumptions, injections, and foolishness in some having to come in and drone on against their inserted imaginations did seem ridiculous enough to watch for a bit.

I appreciate the attempt JustOneWay, but I'm actually fine in my generalization of 'the democrats'. The current democrat ideology and alignment with today's liberalism doesn't lend itself to my having to draw containment lines where I have no reason to believe there are.

Have a nice day.

 

[Sphere]

Too bad Criminology can't quote where I said democrats ordered him to invade Mrs. Palin's privacy.

It's not my responsibility if you cannot remember what you posted 2 pages earlier.

If not, then I will continue to be less than shocked that the events lead to the democrats. Buh-bye

You're entitled to be disingenuous if you want. Just don't feign outrage if someone highlights how a generalization of yours is neither accurate or honest.

 

[JustOneWay]

but I'm actually fine in my generalization of 'the democrats'.

Nothing else needs to be said.

 

[ChristianCenturion]

It's not my responsibility if you cannot remember what you posted 2 pages earlier.


You're entitled to be disingenuous if you want. Just don't feign outrage if someone highlights how a generalization of yours is neither accurate or honest.

Pardon, but I don't see where I need to fool myself in believing the delinquent grew up in a vacuum and was not the son of a very active dem or that he was not motivated to share the ill-gotten and anti-climatic information with non-democrats who support such behavior and so on.

Unlike some who might go into a tizzy about what others have the freedom to think or demonstrat rediculous meltdowns, I say that you are welcome to believe such.

 

[ChristianCenturion]

Nothing else needs to be said.

A part of me might wish that were so, but I am seeing evidence that inclines me to believe that those who do not support the republican candidates might not be able to find self-control against their inherent knee-jerk impulses.

 

[ChristianCenturion]

Rotfl! The ever present fail safe move! Lol...unfortunately nobody put words into the post that blamed the Democrats for one idiot's criminal actions of hacking an email account. See, no matter how many attempts of distraction are made, I've got truth and the facts on my side. Why? I pay more attention to the contents of posts versus the posters. As far as "fellowship" goes iam pretty confident accountability is a pillar of Christian fellowship. Or does it make the convo a bit queasy to bring up Jesus? When false claims are made about a person or group there should be no hesitation on the part of any Christian to bring those false charges to light. But go ahead and point out I don't agree with the extreme Christian right about abortion and gay marriage...hopefully if that gets repeated enough some peeps will forget the post that blamed "...the Democrats" for the actions of one idiot. Most of the evidence I've presented has been ignored in lieu of a lot of hot air.

Iam still going on this to demonstrate the point this isn't about fellowship. It's about wanting to slam others without having that annoying aspect of being held responsible for the contents of posts. I make the energizer bunny look like a moldy couch potatoe.

Here is the problem with that narcissism- you're vastely out of your realm of authority in trying make everyone post only things with which you agree.