nobdysfool
The original! Accept no substitutes!
- Feb 23, 2003
- 15,018
- 1,006
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
The problem here is that JAL comes in here condemning Calvinism, without having laid out a case for doing so, expects everyone to just accept what he says, and then scratches his head wondering why the Calvinists are upset, and attacking him.
JAL brought it on himself, because he doesn't understand that you cannot attack someone, and then expect them to listen to what you have to say. You cannot insult someone, and then expect them to not react. This the same tactic that several other anti-Calvinists have used, and they are no longer around.
Any hope he had of gaining a hearing has been lost. He even admits he is a heretic in the eyes of orthodox theology. Why should we bother to listen to the heretic anymore? He denies the unique nature of the Incarnation. His doctrines should be vigorously withstood. He called me a liar for taking him to task on his false doctrine of the Incarnation, and will not lay it out here, or even hit the high spots here. But in his mind, I am dishonest for pointing out that he made the claim and then did not back it up. That's not dishonesty, but rather an honest pointing out of an important error on his part.
He cannot be reasoned with, that much is clear. I suggest that he be ignored, because he has nothing of worth to add, his reason for being here is to bash, derogate and tell falsehoods about Calvinism.
Stop feeding the animals!
JAL brought it on himself, because he doesn't understand that you cannot attack someone, and then expect them to listen to what you have to say. You cannot insult someone, and then expect them to not react. This the same tactic that several other anti-Calvinists have used, and they are no longer around.
Any hope he had of gaining a hearing has been lost. He even admits he is a heretic in the eyes of orthodox theology. Why should we bother to listen to the heretic anymore? He denies the unique nature of the Incarnation. His doctrines should be vigorously withstood. He called me a liar for taking him to task on his false doctrine of the Incarnation, and will not lay it out here, or even hit the high spots here. But in his mind, I am dishonest for pointing out that he made the claim and then did not back it up. That's not dishonesty, but rather an honest pointing out of an important error on his part.
He cannot be reasoned with, that much is clear. I suggest that he be ignored, because he has nothing of worth to add, his reason for being here is to bash, derogate and tell falsehoods about Calvinism.
Stop feeding the animals!
Upvote
0