S
Steezie
Guest
They actually areVestigal organs makes the case for creationism.
Toe has everything coming from a different thing so many times that vestigal organs should be the standard details of all creatures living today.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junk_DNA
Just because they PHYSICALLY arent there, doesnt mean theres nothing there
Really? How does whales having vestigial legs fit into creationism?instead they are few and far between. Water mammals and snakes have anatomical evidence of previous lifestyles. However these fit fine in creationist models (though many creationists don't see water mammals as originally from land).
Which we can demonstrate happens. Many species of aquatic creatures that live in caves have lost sight alltogether because of they dont need it. Think of it like your bones in zero gravity. Your body doesnt need such strong bones to support its weight so it begins dumping calcium. The same is true, albeit much slower, when organisms lose limbs or organs due to non-needOtherwise cratures lose eyes or wings or this or that due to non use here and there.
....Huh?Evolution is forced to predict vestigal organs exist and yet can't show them as they should because of coarse evolution is a untested, unevidenced guess misunderstanding nature.
Robert Byers
Upvote
0