Hagnismos
Active Member
So now those who practice sin are oppressed peoples? I'm guessing they are really not going to like the judgment of God. That is why I am serious when I call homosexuals to repent of their homosexuality and let Jesus be their Savior and Lord, at which point they will know that every thought has to be held captive to Christ.Which certainly proves Paul was not a sexologist.
One, the idea there's a unitary "LGBT Agenda" is just plain paranoiac, and two, even if it could be proven such exists, a business enterprise would be hard-pressed to support it; and three, all capitalism is an antithesis to a religion of love but to call even the suits of a multinational like Mickey D's "enemies of God" for acknowledging the humanity of oppressed people in some slight way, is both hyperbolic and reprehensible.
Dare I ask, Lynn, what do you think of the ex-gay movement?
And, please try to help me understand how Ocean Grove, NJ suddenly gets six applications for same sex unions within a few weeks when it has been known for 100 years to be a place of evangelical worship. You can pretend that your people are not targeting those who oppose them but it just does not ring true. You can't stand it when someone decides to believe the Bible when it says homosexuality is sin. I am aware of the hatred and harassment being levelled against the ex-gay movement. It's going to stop. Whether the ending is happy or sad you people are not going to be allowed to stalk people with impunity in this democracy. And if democracy fails us I'm sure the events in the Book of Revelation will handle the rest.
Sexology? The term is Left-field. Clearly Paul was not a phycisist, is he therefore not qualified to talk about God's creation? It was his belief that homosexuality was a sin (Romans 1) that could be repented of (1 Cor 6) and if you are telling gays and lesbians other than that you are not a friend of Christ (2 John), or of the souls tormented by that sin. The Lord rebuke you (Jude.)
Upvote
0