What are the Holes in Evolution?

[Split Rock]

Better check ur memory then --- that's not in that thread.

Here it is (for better or worse):

A kind is a plant or animal at the top of God's taxon that contains all the genetic blueprints necessary to replenish the earth as God intended.

In early Genesis, the kinds are not easily identified, as they probably only lived for one or two generations - (but their lifespans were very long).

They would have been of the more docile, domestic kind, and certainly would not have included carnivores in their incipient stages.

These may have included such creatures as the winged horse, but that's just a guess.

By Genesis 6, the kinds would have been less docile, and leaning more toward survival in an hostile environment.

These kinds would have included the animals that are not currently mentioned in man's taxons; such as behemoth, leviathan, fowled bats, four-legged grasshoppers, satyrs, unicorns, et. al.

 

[Elduran]

Better check ur memory then --- that's not in that thread.

The point still stands that you clearly didn't have a clue what you were talking about, just spouting nonsense that you thought sounded scientific enough to throw people off the scent.

It didn't work.

 

[AV1611VET]

Now, without using your Bible, why are humans not in the Ape "kind"?

Without my Bible???

Trying to disarm me? That Bible is the only offensive Weapon mentioned in the arsenal against Satan in Ephesians 6.

It pwns more "scientists" and atheists per square mile, than Roundup pwns weeds.

 

[TheOutsider]

Without my Bible???

Trying to disarm me? That Bible is the only offensive Weapon mentioned in the arsenal against Satan in Ephesians 6.

It pwns more "scientists" and atheists per square mile, than Roundup pwns weeds.

I don't want you to use the Bible because I don't accept its authority. It would be like a Muslim quoting the Koran to you.

 

[AV1611VET]

... just spouting nonsense that you thought sounded scientific enough to throw people off the scent.

My apologies if it sounded "scientific" --- I hold "science" up to a higher Standard than "scientists" do.

 

[AV1611VET]

I want you to use the Bible because I don't accept its authority. It would be like a Muslim quoting the Koran to you.

I did use the Bible --- did you recognize it?

(Hint: It's the One without the copyrite.)

Elduran's country gave It to us.

 

[TheOutsider]

Trying to disarm me? That Bible is the only offensive Weapon mentioned in the arsenal against Satan in Ephesians 6.

It pwns more "scientists" and atheists per square mile, than Roundup pwns weeds.

Also, are you saying that people who agree with scientific evidence and conclusions are Satanists? That seems like a very broad brush you are painting with.

 

[AV1611VET]

Also, are you saying that people who agree with scientific evidence and conclusions are Satanists?

No --- even I disagree with "scientific evidence and conclusions". (Not to mention the "scientists" themselves who disagree with each other.)

 

[Blayz]

No --- even I disagree with "scientific evidence and conclusions". (Not to mention the "scientists" themselves who disagree with each other.)

Right. if only we were more like the Christians, who are all in complete agreement on everything.

 

[Nathan Poe]

Without my Bible???

Trying to disarm me? That Bible is the only offensive Weapon mentioned in the arsenal against Satan in Ephesians 6.

It pwns more "scientists" and atheists per square mile, than Roundup pwns weeds.

So why have you gotten nowhere even with it?

 

[Nathan Poe]

My apologies if it sounded "scientific" --- I hold "science" up to a higher Standard than "scientists" do.

No worries, AV -- I doubt you fooled anyone.

 

[Wiccan_Child]

We are referred to as mankind

By whom? I, for instance, refer to our species as 'humanity'.

--- not to be confused at all with the other kinds in the Bible.

Which are...? I remember you made a thread about it, but you didn't actually define what a 'kind' is/was. You just said it was 'God's Taxon' or something, and left it at that, without actually explaining what 'God's Taxon' actually means.
So could you give us a definition now, or are you content to make such nonsensicle statements?

 

[Nathan Poe]

We are referred to as mankind --- not to be confused at all with the other kinds in the Bible.

Please tell me you're joking, AV -- are you actually trotting out an idiosyncrasy of English vocabulary as proof of something?

 

[Elduran]

My apologies if it sounded "scientific" --- I hold "science" up to a higher Standard than "scientists" do.

Clearly you don't if you're happy to make up whatever you like about science in order to try and get your point heard. That's not holding it up to a higher standard at all, it's just plain dishonesty.

 

[ReverendDG]

Without my Bible???

Trying to disarm me? That Bible is the only offensive Weapon mentioned in the arsenal against Satan in Ephesians 6.

It pwns more "scientists" and atheists per square mile, than Roundup pwns weeds.

maybe in your own little world where you ignore those who answer your questions and you just repeat your claims over and over again till they give up.
then they are pwned only because they don't want to debate your nonsense anymore and you claim a "victory" that isn't one

 

[ReverendDG]

My apologies if it sounded "scientific" --- I hold "science" up to a higher Standard than "scientists" do.

i guess you must define science as "stuff i agree with" then and scientists as "people i agree with"

 

[MoonLancer]

AV

My apologies if it sounded "scientific" --- I hold "science" up to a higher Standard than "scientists" do.

I guess you fight fires better then fire fighters, and heal better then doctors too?

 

[AV1611VET]

So why have you gotten nowhere even with it?

Don't kid yourself:

[bible]Isaiah 55:11[/bible]

 

[AV1611VET]

By whom? I, for instance, refer to our species as 'humanity'.

By God, Himself:

[bible]James 3:7[/bible]

We're just using His terminology.

Which are...? I remember you made a thread about it, but you didn't actually define what a 'kind' is/was.

I do believe I did.

You just said it was 'God's Taxon' or something, and left it at that, without actually explaining what 'God's Taxon' actually means.

Do you know what a taxon is? Do you know what "man's taxon" would be? Then do you know therefore what "God's taxon" would be?

So could you give us a definition now, or are you content to make such nonsensicle statements?

You asked what a "kind" was --- I said it was a plant or animal at the top of God's taxon. Now you want to know what "God's taxon" is.

Where does this end, WC? Can't you think for yourself?

You guys want "religion" out of the public schools, then all you do is ask questions and accuse us of making "nonsensicle statements".

Now --- having said that --- is the definition of "kind" that I have supplied you guys good enough, or not?

If not, and you have a legitimate question; by all means, ask it.

 

[AV1611VET]

Please tell me you're joking, AV -- are you actually trotting out an idiosyncrasy of English vocabulary as proof of something?

Ya --- here's my "idiosyncrasy of English vocabulary":

[bible]James 3:7[/bible]