• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

You Make The Comments!

thecountrydoc

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2006
2,745
58
85
San Marcos, CA
✟70,664.00
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
So, where does this leave us???


Christians and atheists start a calmer dialogue

By Jane Lampman, Staff writer of The Christian Science MonitorThu May 10, 4:00 AM ET

Wednesday night on ABC-TV, two televangelists took on nonbelievers from the Rational Response Squad in a bid to prove the existence of God (see "Nightline Face Off" on ABCNews.com).

The TV polemics come in the wake of a rash of bestselling books by atheists challenging religion. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and Christopher Hitchens, among others, go beyond questioning God to charge that religion is a plague that needs to be eliminated. Their vehemence, some suggest, is in response to Chris­tian attacks on evolution and stem-cell research. "It's Christian militancy that has evoked a backlash of atheist militancy," says Michael Bleiweiss, a physicist and atheist from Methuen, Mass.

Amid the rising heat of this latest culture clash, though, a few people on both sides are finding calmer ways to engage, seeking to build bridges and even learn from one another. Some Christians, concerned that millions of Americans never cross the threshold of a church, want to understand why, as well as learn what it is in evangelistic efforts that turns people off. Some atheists, worried that polls show they are the least accepted social group in the country, want to break down stereotypes and change people's attitudes.
So both are willing to sit down together in different venues, discuss their divergent perspectives, and, in some cases, jointly visit church services across the United States. As a result, they are sparking a growing Christian-atheist dialogue on the Web.

At a conference in Salem, Mass., last Saturday, for example, Christians from several states listened to atheists and neopagans talk about who they are, the origin of their ethics and beliefs, and what challenges they encounter in a society that is predominantly Christian. "I've never understood treating a people group as [the enemy] because their belief system is different," says Phil Wyman, pastor of The Gathering, a Salem church that sponsored the conference.

Jim Henderson, a former Evangelical pastor from Seattle who moderated the atheism discussion, has been getting an earful for some time. Frustrated at his inability to draw more people to his church, Mr. Henderson set out to learn how "the unchurched" respond to various kinds of worship services – what it is they find appealing and what leaves them cold. He began to pay nonbelievers $25 to go to a church and tell him what they thought."I also became intrigued by why evangelism bothered everybody, including me," he says in an interview. "I decided to devote my life to reimagining evangelism ... how to do it and be 'normal.' "Soon, he got wind of an auction on eBay in which a student at the University of Illinois in Chicago proposed "selling my soul" to the highest bidder. Young atheist Hemant Mehta had been raised in Jainism, but left the faith in his teens. Mr. Mehta was curious about Christianity and whether it could provide any evidence for the existence of God. Wondering if he might be missing something, he offered to attend church with the winning bidder. High bidder takes atheist to church, with the top bid of $504, Henderson asked Mehta to visit 15 churches, fill out a survey on each one, and share his perspectives on Henderson's website (off-the-map.org).The experience has changed the lives of both men. Mehta, now an honors graduate in mathematics and biology, has not converted, but the two have become friends. Mehta has started his own blog (friendlyatheist.com) and travels to speak to churches and humanist organizations. He has written a book – "I Sold My Soul on eBay" – that explains why he is an atheist and gives churches advice on what it would take to reach nonbelievers.

Henderson has gone on to pair with another atheist, Matt Casper, for further church visits across the US, and they've written "Jim and Casper Go to Church." Both books offer insightful, revealing, sometimes humorous critiques of what a variety of Christian services, in churches of different sizes and denominations, look like to the uninitiated. Henderson also conducts interviews with men and women who are non­believers as an event at church and pastor conferences. Many Evangelicals "are obsessed with conversion," he says, and always speak of non-Christians as "lost." The interviews show Christians immersed in their own culture and how that sounds to the people they approach. At the Salem conference, Mr. Bleiweiss recalled a co-worker who "worked Jesus into every conversation we had." Henderson's experiences have led him, with his "Off The Map" venture, into "something larger than evangelism," what he calls "otherliness." Otherliness – "the spirituality of serving others" – involves "drawing people into the idea of paying real attention to each other, of listening." He wants to teach individuals and groups of all kinds how to do a much better job of listening to those they interact with. For his part, Mehta is still open to "any compelling evidence of the existence of God." He describes positive elements in some churches, such as top-notch speakers and impressive community outreach. "The more work churches do for everyone, the more respect they'll get from outsiders," he writes. Yet churchgoers are missing the mark, he says, when they think non & shy;religious people lack a basis for ethical values, look down on non-Christians, or fail to speak out against religious leaders who make outrageous public statements.

What would convince him? A miracle. During church services, they often fail to explain traditions or rituals, which leaves visitors confused. "Why is the structure of the service always the same?" Mehta wonders.
Zeroing in on "what it would take to convert me," he says a church would need to appeal to his sense of reason, challenge him to think more deeply, and allow for asking questions. "I wasn't confronted with a new line of thinking that challenged my commitment to scientific empiricism," he writes. Also, he'd want a church where "men and women lead on an equal basis."
Most important, he states, what would convince him would be "a miracle – an undeniable miracle that has no natural explanation."

While on their tour of the most prominent megachurches and stylistically innovative churches, Mr. Casper asked Henderson, "Is this what Jesus told you guys to do?"
The 30-something father of two is generally unimpressed with the multi & shy; media "killer" church services they attend. Articulate in explaining his reactions in detail, he, like Mehta, also finds in the predictable format of services that "certainty is boring, certainty is closed off. "When a healing is mentioned in one Pentecostal service, though, he reacts strongly. If that man can heal, he says, "why is he ... hanging out in this building?... Get out there, then! There are people who need your help." Saying that he loves the teachings of Jesus, along with those of other important teachers, Casper concludes: "The question that just came up for me again and again ... is, What does the way Christianity is practiced today have to do with the ... words and deeds" of Jesus?

For Henderson, Wyman, and Mehta, the value of talking and listening to those with differing worldviews has become crystal clear.Pastor Wyman has been reaching out to non-Christians in Salem, and particularly to the large neopagan community here (attracted, no doubt, by Salem's identification with witchcraft in Colonial times). His stereotypes about witches were often wrong, he says. Having formed respectful relationships, he's now being asked to come to pagan events to speak about Christian perspectives. "Christians for quite some time have been creating events and trying to draw people into our little box, and we call that 'outreach,' " he says. "This is an exciting opportunity – people are opening, listening, and seeking out spiritual things."


Copyright © 2007 The Christian Science Monitor


I look forward to your comments.

Your brother in Christ,
Doc
 
T

TrustAndObey2

Guest
Did you watch the Face-Off Doc?

It wasn't handled very well, in my opinion.

The Rational Response Squad have people on their website sending in videotaped statements that blaspheme God. It's really very sad.

The atheists on the show were rude and kept talking between themselves and smirking. In that regard Kirk Cameron and Ray Comfort did do a much better job (since they DIDN'T do those things), but they weren't well-prepared for some of the questions.

I don't think it was a total disaster, but it could've been so much better.

One atheist did give testimony afterwards that he didn't realize there were no transitional fossils, and that made him definitely doubt Darwin's theory.

He had never heard the difference between macroevolution and microevolution.

Anyway, in response to bridging a gap with atheists, I know of one definite way to do that, and have in the past, but we're not allowed to talk about it on this forum unfortunately.

I just find it odd that most of them completely deny the existence of God, but then tell us we're insane for following an unmerciful God.

I don't think I've ever met a self-proclaimed atheist that really didn't believe in God. They just believe in an evil tyrant God, and not the God of scripture.
 
Upvote 0

woobadooba

Legend
Sep 4, 2005
11,307
914
✟25,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I watched as much of it as I was able to bear. These guys should have been better prepared. They didn't do their homework.

Those atheists wouldn't even know what to do with people like Norman Geisler, who I believe is a modern day C.S. Lewis, and perhaps even more of an intellectual giant than he was.

It's too bad it turned out that way. It could have been a lot more powerful had they been better prepared.
 
Upvote 0
T

TrustAndObey2

Guest
He is a theist Apologist. An incredibly intelligent one too!

Get the book: Unshakable Foundations

It's one of the best books on the subject, and easy to follow too.

I found the book on half.com, and I noticed one of the chapters is on heaven and hell.

Is he Adventist or no?

Doesn't really matter, but I've read enough books that talk about eternal torment, and I don't want to waste precious bookshelf space on another one. :)
 
Upvote 0

woobadooba

Legend
Sep 4, 2005
11,307
914
✟25,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I found the book on half.com, and I noticed one of the chapters is on heaven and hell.

Is he Adventist or no?

Doesn't really matter, but I've read enough books that talk about eternal torment, and I don't want to waste precious bookshelf space on another one. :)

He is not an SDA.

I think you would be making a mistake not to get this book.

The portions of it where he doesn't give his personal views on doctrines such as heaven and hell, are invaluable to witnessing to those who do not believe that God exists, as well as those who believe in ideas such as situational ethics and moral relativism.
 
Upvote 0
T

TrustAndObey2

Guest
He is not an SDA.

I think you would be making a mistake not to get this book.

The portions of it where he doesn't give his personal views on doctrines such as heaven and hell, are invaluable to witnessing to those who do not believe that God exists, as well as those who believe in ideas such as situational ethics and moral relativism.

I ordered it before I asked the question actually.

I need a good book to read on the way to Colorado. My youngest son is going too, so there probably won't be any reading time, but I'll give it a shot.
 
Upvote 0
T

TrustAndObey2

Guest
I just went to the Rational Response Squad website. I know, I shouldn't have, but I did.

The Blasphemy Challenge is them telling people to deny the existence of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit.

I guess they don't realize that blasphemy is to put yourself EQUAL with God, and an atheist would have to acknowledge there IS a God in order to do that. :)
 
Upvote 0

woobadooba

Legend
Sep 4, 2005
11,307
914
✟25,191.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Where Kirk and Ray really went wrong is in their whole approach to unbelievers.

Their ministry is built on telling people what they are. They ask the questions; but leave little room for anyone to question them. This is why they were caught off guard. They weren't prepared because they didn't know the questions. And they didn't know the questions because they didn't ask the right questions in advance. In other words, they really never took the time to get to know what these people believe about their claims well enough to address them in an intelligent manner.

For example, notice how Ray kept referring to the Bible. Though this is a good thing, it wasn't the right time to do it, since those with whom he had addressed don't agree that God exists. Obviously they wouldn't agree that the Bible is inspired by such a God. So appealing to the Bible as a source to prove absolute morality didn't work in this case. They could have proven absolute morality to be true without doing this. C.S. Lewis did it in Mere Christianity.

Moreover, they assume their approach to be the Way of The Master, as they call it--Jesus' way, in other words. However, what they fail to see is that Jesus knew the hearts of the people. He could read their thoughts even. He knew exactly what to say, and when to say it.

Kirk and Ray do not have this knowledge. To put people in camera and declare them to be guilty of adultery and thievery is not Jesus' way in my opinion.

Instead of telling people what they are, they ought to get to know these people first, so that they may be able to use the information that is disclosed to them as a means to reach their soul for Christ.

Christ knew the hearts of those whom He had spoken to. Kirk and Ray don't. So their approach really isn't The Way of The Master. But it would do them well to learn from Him, so as to rightly represent Him if they ever find themselves in a debate again.
 
Upvote 0
T

TrustAndObey

Guest
Where Kirk and Ray really went wrong is in their whole approach to unbelievers.

Their ministry is built on telling people what they are. They ask the questions; but leave little room for anyone to question them. This is why they were caught off guard. They weren't prepared because they didn't know the questions. And they didn't know the questions because they didn't ask the right questions in advance. In other words, they really never took the time to get to know what these people believe about their claims well enough to address them in an intelligent manner.

Notice how Ray kept referring to the Bible. Though this is a good thing, it wasn't the right time to do it, since those who don't agree that God exists obviously wouldn't agree that the Bible is inspired by such a God. So appealing to the Bible as a source to prove absolute morality didn't work in this case.

They assume their approach to be the Way of The Master, as they call it--Jesus' way, in other words. However, what they fail to see is that Jesus knew the hearts of the people. He could read their thoughts even. He knew exactly what to say, and when to say it.

Kirk and Ray do not have this knowledge. To put people in camera and declare them to be guilty of adultery and thievery is not Jesus' way in my opinion.

Instead of telling people what they are, they ought to get to know these people first, so that they may be able to use the information that is disclosed to them as a means to reach their soul for Christ.

Christ knew the hearts of those whom He had spoken to. Kirk and Ray don't. So their approach really isn't The Way of The Master. But it would do them well to learn from Him, so as to rightly represent Him if they ever find themselves in a debate again.

The most disheartening thing about them not being prepared is that they were the ones that wanted it televised. The raw version was worse than what made it on television.

Neither side did very well in my opinion, but I do admire the work Kirk and Ray TRIED to do. And hey, they reached at least one person so it was a success as far as I'm concerned.

But you're right, they didn't know the people they were talking to, like Christ would have.

There's a guy in GT saying that Jesus was just a human with a human mind and that He believed in the fairytale of Genesis because that's ALL He'd been told.

Sometimes I forget that I'm on a Christian forum honestly, although I am thankful that everyone has a right to their opinion.

It's just really sad how people take away the power of Christ.

Science is not always right, Jesus is.
 
Upvote 0