• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

For the Christian Right, Gay-Hating Is Just the Start

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
http://www.alternet.org/rights/49160/
For the Christian Right, Gay-Hating Is Just the Start
By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted March 19, 2007.

As the Christian right works hard to make gays and lesbians second-class citizens, society needs to make a stand -- or else the same tactics will soon be used against other "social deviants."

On the morning of March 8 in Sioux Center, Iowa, a bus parked outside a hotel was found covered with anti-gay slurs, along with a hate-filled message on a piece of cardboard reading: "God does not love feary f*gs."

The bus was one of two that were transporting some 50 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students, along with supporters, on the start of a two-month trip to 32 Christian colleges with policies that discriminate against those who are not heterosexuals. The Equality Ride, as it is known, organized by Soulforce, had first traveled to Sioux Center to visit Dordt College, a school that counts "sexual activity with someone of the same gender" as possible grounds for "an employee's discharge or a student's dismissal."

The harassment is not new. During a similar series of protests last year, someone in Cleveland, Tenn., scrawled "f*g-mobile" on the side of the bus. Members of the Equality Ride have been arrested for trespassing, at the West Point military academy and elsewhere, and greeted at many of their stops with active hostility. The night before the buses were spray-painted with hateful slogans, three vehicles circled the hotel where the activists were staying to harass those inside.

The website has more on the ride, including pictures of the bus graffiti. But what is important is not this specific incident, or any other recent examples of public intolerance, but the seismic shift in public mood in much of the United States, a shift largely engineered by the radical Christian right. The Christian right has begun to strip gays and lesbians of their constitutional rights and render them second-class citizens. The gay rights movement, which made many gains over the past couple of decades, is reeling backward. And the mounting persecution of gays and lesbians is ominous not only for them but for the rest of society.

I spent two years reporting and writing "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America." At the numerous gatherings I attended around the country, one of the driving forces and most effective mobilizing agents was the issue of sexuality. This mass movement, led by figures such as James Dobson, claims that tolerance of "alternative lifestyles" is eroding the American family. They describe "same-sex attraction" as a disease that can be cured. And they condemn all sexual love that is not heterosexual as an abomination in the eyes of God.

Gays and lesbians still within the church, seeking desperately to deny their sexuality and remain in the Christian collective, often suffer severe depression and blows to their self-esteem. The U.S. surgeon general's office has published data indicating that those who are young and gay are two to three times more likely to commit suicide. Those who conform, no matter what the personal cost, will find acceptance. Those who remain militant, who stand up for another way of being, must be silenced. The methods that will finally sever them and their supporters from a Christian America are often left unmentioned, but the rhetoric makes clear that there will not be a place for them. Gays and lesbians, like other enemies of Christ, are not fully human. They are "unnatural." And preachers in the movement argue that if America does not act soon to eradicate homosexual behavior, God will punish the nation.

These attacks mask a sinister agenda that has nothing to do with sexuality. It has to do with power. The radical Christian right -- the most dangerous mass movement in American history -- has built a binary worldview of command and submission wherein male leaders, who cannot be questioned and claim to speak for God, are in control and all others must follow. Any lifestyle outside the traditional model of male and female is a threat to this hierarchical male power structure. Women who do not depend on men for their identity and their sexuality, who live outside a male power relationship, challenge this pervasive cult of masculinity, as do men who find tenderness and love with other men as equals. The lifestyle of gays and lesbians is intolerable to the Christian right because its existence is a threat to the movement's chain of command, one they insist was ordained by God.

This hypermasculinity, which crushes the independence and self-expression of women, is a way for men in the movement to compensate for the curtailing of their own independence, their blind obedience to church authorities and the calls for sexual restraint. The images of Jesus often show him with thick muscles, clutching a sword. Christian men are portrayed as powerful warriors. Jesus' stoic endurance of the brutal whippings in Mel Gibson's movie "The Passion of the Christ" presages the brutal, masculine world of this ideology, a world that knows little of tenderness, personal freedom, nurturing and even pleasure. Jerry Falwell, in a New Yorker interview, said Christ was not a gentle-looking, willowy man: "Christ was a man with muscles," he insisted. Falwell and Gibson see real men, godly men, as powerful, able to endure physical pain and suffering without complaint. Jesus, like God, has to be a real man, a man who dominates through force. The language of the movement is filled with metaphors about the use of excessive force and violence against God's enemies.

The unspoken truth is that Christian men are required to have a personal, loving relationship with a male deity and surrender their will to a male-dominated authoritarian church. The submission to church authority is a potent form of emasculation. It entails a surrendering of conscience and personal control and deadens emotions and feelings. Glorified acts of force and violence against outsiders, against nonbelievers, compensate for this unquestioning submission. The domination that men are encouraged to practice in the home over women and children becomes a reflection of the domination they are taught to endure outside the home.

This cult of masculinity keeps all ambiguity, especially sexual ambiguity, in check. It fosters this world of binary opposites: God and man, the saved and the unsaved, the church and the world, Christianity and secular humanism, and male and female. There runs through this radical belief system a dread of disorder and chaos. The belief in a binary universe helps believers avoid confronting the confusion of human existence. Reality, when it is defined in these absolutes, is made predictable and understandable. All configurations of human life that do not conform to the rigid Christian model, such as homosexuality, are forms of disorder and tools of Satan and must be abolished. A world that can be predicted and understood, a world that has clear markers, can be managed and controlled. This petrified world of fixed, immutable and established roles is a world where people, many of them damaged by bouts with failure and despair, can bury their chaotic and fragmented personalities. They can live with the illusion that they are strong, whole and protected. Those who do not fit into these rigid categories, who are not subservient to dominant Christian males, must be proselytized, converted and "cured" through quack therapy.

The Christian right believes the decline of male prowess has caused the decline of America, which has led to weakness and moral decay. This decline has resulted in a bewildering human and social complexity that, often seen as feminine, is the work of Satan. By submitting to the Christian leader, and to a powerful male God who will destroy those who misbehave, followers avoid dealing with life. The movement seeks, above all, to banish mystery, the very essence of faith. Not only is the binary world knowable and predictable, but finally God is knowable and predictable. This parallel reality creates a world where unconscious motives, lusts, passions, sexual yearnings, deep longings and fears are buried and denied. The capacity we all have for evil is no longer something that torments the human soul, something that must be confronted and acknowledged, but instead evil is transformed into a purely external force that can be eradicated. The cut-and-dry absolute truth, the division of the world into us and them, allows followers to surrender their consciences and moral responsibility to male demagogues. It also makes them very dangerous.

The Rev. Mel White, who founded Soulforce and is one of our country's most important if unacknowledged civil rights leaders, has spent most of his life, since coming out as a gay man, mounting nonviolent protests against these "Christian" bigots. But he and most gays and lesbians who resist usually resist alone.

"They [the Christian right] want to end homosexuality in America," White told me, "and by doing that one step at a time, first the federal marriage amendment and then comes no adoption, no service in the military, the restatement of the sodomy laws and driving us back into our closets, or worse. They do not want to compromise, but they begin with compromise, after compromise, after compromise."

The advance, White says, is demoralizing the gay community, which he warns "is losing the will to fight."

"It's safer back in the closet anyway, and since we can pass, or the gay leaders can pass, the ones who wear suits and have good jobs and have plenty of money, they will go underground," he said. "It is the gay people out there in the hinterlands who have no options. They are being rejected by their families, discarded by their parents, kicked out of their jobs, harassed, 'outed' and killed. The gay leaders don't have a clue about this suffering."

"There are no fountains or cafeterias or bus stations we can integrate," White continued. "There are no symbols that we can attack. Marriage, the one great act of defiance, in San Francisco and Massachusetts showed to the country gay couples lined up to get married. This is something they [right-wing Christians] didn't like. The faces looked normal. They had children. These pictures were killing the caricatures. That for me is one of the great things we've done, just go to get married no matter what."

"What frightens me most are gay people who don't understand what's happening and who are unwilling to take a stand," he said. "Once they take away our rights they're going to start wanting to register us because we're the ones who have the most sexually transmitted diseases. They're going to say 'we want to register you so we can give you special medical attention.' Quarantine comes next, along with taking away our children, the children we've adopted. They will take away the partnership rights the corporations put in place, because they can put pressure on the corporations. My bleakest description is that we'll not only be driven back into our closets, but we'll have to leave the country. Right now, we have to leave the state of Virginia, because of the law that says we can't have any agreements, or any contracts, or any powers of attorney that represent marriage. So every gay person who has a business here lives in fear."

My ethics professor at Harvard Divinity School, Dr. James Luther Adams, told us to watch closely what the Christian right did to homosexuals. He had seen the same tactic in Nazi Germany, where he spent 1935 and 1936 working with the underground anti-Nazi church known as the Confessing Church. The Nazis also used "values" to launch state repression of opponents. Hitler, days after he took power in 1933, imposed a ban on all homosexual organizations. He ordered raids on places where homosexuals gathered, culminating in the ransacking of the Institute for Sexual Science in Berlin and the permanent exile of its director, Magnus Hirschfeld. Thousands of volumes from the institute's library were tossed into a bonfire.

The stripping of these Germans' civil rights was largely cheered by the public and the German churches. But it legitimated tactics, outside the law, that would soon be employed against others. Adams said homosexuals would also be the first "social deviants" singled out and disempowered by the Christian right, but not the last.

Should another catastrophic attack such as 9/11 occur, should we enter into a period of prolonged instability and fear, what will prevent these preachers from calling for the punishment, detention and quarantining of gays and lesbians, as well as abortionists and Muslims and other nonbelievers to safeguard the nation? What will staunch hate crimes and physical attacks against those deemed immoral by fearful and angry Christians, against those whom these preachers have condemned as responsible for the nation's abandonment by God? How will the nation function rationally if homeland security depends on an elusive piety as it is interpreted by the Christian right? And most ominously, the fringe groups of the Christian right believe "Bible-believing Christians" have been mandated by God to carry out Christian terrorism, to murder doctors who perform abortions and godless Muslims. In a time of anxiety and chaos, of overwhelming fear and uncertainty, how many more will be prodded by this talk of terror and divine vengeance to join the ranks of these Christian extremists?

Chris Hedges is the former Middle East bureau chief for The New York Times and the author of "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America" and "War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning."
 

buck

Active Member
Mar 16, 2007
125
7
77
Twin lake, Michigan
✟15,292.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I myself do not hate gays, as they choose to be called.
Gay used to mean happy, fun loving not homo.
I'm willing to say modest gays who live a quite live and don't run around in drag and holler " were queer and were here live with it" have the troble your talking about, It's Bible wrong and I think it's
moraly wrong. If you think a round hole is square, then you can think that way. But do not tell me it's true,
 
Upvote 0

JacktheCatholic

Praise be to Jesus Christ. Now and forever.
Mar 9, 2007
24,545
2,797
57
Michigan, USA
Visit site
✟51,888.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
These are hate crimes against a person and to claim you are Christian when doing hate crimes is to show you are actually the devil.

God taught to love the person and hate the sin.

We should never condone a person's sinful nature and we should always teach against sin. But in doing so we need to show love to the sinner.

If you are not sure what love is then I encourage you to read Corinthians since it will spell it out for you and do not bother with Websters definition.

Peace,

Jack
 
Upvote 0

112657

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2006
728
88
Upstate New York
✟23,809.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Democrat
Sometimes I want to tattoo myself with words like queer, lezzie, and dyke in bold all over my body with the word CHRISTIAN squarely on my forehead.

Am I wrong, Uber, or do I remember that some group did something just like that? Didn't a bunch of gay (mostly) youths paint up their own bus, using the same language, but with a positive message? Like, to take the negative power away from the words that had been used against others? And then go across country?

Gay still means happy to me. Some of the most fun-loving folks I ever have met have been homo.
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm not offended, and I have no intention of reporting you, Uber, but you should remove the f, rhymes with rag, word from that. I've gotten posts deleated for less than that.

I was quoting from the original article, which changed the three-letter f-word into [wash you mouth] [wash you mouth] [wash you mouth].

I knew the three letter f-word would not make it in unchanged, and I was trying to leave as much of the article intact, which is why I used the asterisk.
 
Upvote 0

Mling

Knight of the Woeful Countenance (in training)
Jun 19, 2006
5,815
688
Here and there.
✟9,635.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
If the Christian right were as powerful as that article makes them seem, the gays would silent as mice and nearly invisible. Not so nice try, but faced with facts, it just don't wash.

How do you figure that? No matter how powerful an oppressive group, there are always at least some people who fight back against it. The Roma, who are horribly oppressed in many places, are pretty darn compliant (if it becomes illegal to be live in a certain city while being Roma, the response is often to just leave without a fight), but there are still some who fight back and object vocally to their poor treatment. There are always some.
I don't think it is possible to create an oppressive force so extreme that the people they oppress would be "silent as mice and nearly invisible." It is basic human nature that some will always fight back. Sometimes, many will fight back.

I don't want to comment on how strong anti-gay sentiment is, in America, in 2007, but the argument "You're not quivering in a corner and whimpering, so you're treatment can't be that bad," is very poor reasoning. It is based on the assumption that everybody values their own life over social justice. Some do, and will keep silent if it will save their own lives. Some don't, and will respond with passionate resistance, knowing that it puts them at risk. And yes, if the focus of the oppressive force (no matter how mild or extreme) is to make you invisible, or convince you that you have no right to live your life, then resistance might simply mean living your life and refusing to apologize for your own existance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Abiel
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If the Christian right were as powerful as that article makes them seem, the gays would silent as mice and nearly invisible. Not so nice try, but faced with facts, it just don't wash.

Even back in the bad old days of the 1930s and early 1940s, there were some Roma and some Jews who actively fought back against the Germans -- and let's not forget the resistance movements of the French Underground, as well as in Norway.

The Native Americans did much the same thing in the 19th century as we took over their lands. (Imagine: the Native Americans actually resisted as we broke treaties and invaded their lands!)
 
Upvote 0

Mobiosity

American by birth; Southern by the grace of God.
Feb 20, 2007
2,392
210
✟18,555.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
How do you figure that? No matter how powerful an oppressive group, there are always at least some people who fight back against it. The Roma, who are horribly oppressed in many places, are pretty darn compliant (if it becomes illegal to be live in a certain city while being Roma, the response is often to just leave without a fight), but there are still some who fight back and object vocally to their poor treatment. There are always some.
I don't think it is possible to create an oppressive force so extreme that the people they oppress would be "silent as mice and nearly invisible." It is basic human nature that some will always fight back. Sometimes, many will fight back.

I don't want to comment on how strong anti-gay sentiment is, in America, in 2007, but the argument "You're not quivering in a corner and whimpering, so you're treatment can't be that bad," is very poor reasoning. It is based on the assumption that everybody values their own life over social justice. Some do, and will keep silent if it will save their own lives. Some don't, and will respond with passionate resistance, knowing that it puts them at risk. And yes, if the focus of the oppressive force (no matter how mild or extreme) is to make you invisible, or convince you that you have no right to live your life, then resistance might simply mean living your life and refusing to apologize for your own existance.
Somebody else's sex life is of no interest to me. If they want to lay down with their own kind they are free to do so. To scream that they want to be given protection for something they should be doing in private is a stretch that I'm not willing to make. I'm fat, does that give me the right to scream for protection when someone makes hog noises or yells fatso? No. So to ask me to support them in getting special treatment for something that is, in fact, invisible is beyond ridiculous. Homos and heteros need to get a grip and realize not everyone is interested in their peccadillos. So live your life, don't apologize for your existence, but don't shove your sex down my throat.
"We're queer and we're here?" Shove it!
 
Upvote 0

Mling

Knight of the Woeful Countenance (in training)
Jun 19, 2006
5,815
688
Here and there.
✟9,635.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Somebody else's sex life is of no interest to me. If they want to lay down with their own kind they are free to do so. To scream that they want to be given protection for something they should be doing in private is a stretch that I'm not willing to make. I'm fat, does that give me the right to scream for protection when someone makes hog noises or yells fatso? No. So to ask me to support them in getting special treatment for something that is, in fact, invisible is beyond ridiculous. Homos and heteros need to get a grip and realize not everyone is interested in their peccadillos. So live your life, don't apologize for your existence, but don't shove your sex down my throat.
"We're queer and we're here?" Shove it!

That's the thing, homosexuality is about relationships, and relationships are about much more than sex. Rarely is the actual sex act "shoved down [anybody's] throat." When and if it is (I can't think of an example of somebody having public sex and demanding that passers-by stop and watch), I would be very opposed to it. But people tend to claim "you're shoving it down my throat" in response to any obvious reference to homosexuality, like:
holding hands in public
a couple buying a house in the suburbs, putting up a little white picket fence and walking their dog around the neighborhood
wearing clothes that break gender-stereotypes (and I'm not talking about cross-dressing, but men wearing brightly colored or loud outfits)
mentioning that one went on a date
writing or talking about any aspect of one's life, if it makes any reference at all to one being homosexual.

This is what I mean. Simply living one's life should include the freedom to live it with the same freedoms that others have--including the freedom to not have to hide very mundane things out of fear that it will get people violently riled. We're not talking about being allowed to commit sodomy in the cornor grocery store, on top of the lettuce stand. We're talking about being able to answer the question "How was your weekend?" with something like "Quiet, kinda boring but nice. My wife and I did some gardening, and then we watched an old Star Trek re-run."

This article started off, if you recall, with the inability of a group of gay people to drive a bus without having to wash hateful slurs off of it the next morning.
 
Upvote 0

112657

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2006
728
88
Upstate New York
✟23,809.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Politics
US-Democrat
I don't know you, so this isn't about you personally, but this statement is jammed with ignorance. I can't tell if you are serious or just baiting. To say that gays fighting for the right to marry is only about sex is so completely disrespectful that I barely know how to respond to it.



Somebody else's sex life is of no interest to me. If they want to lay down with their own kind they are free to do so. To scream that they want to be given protection for something they should be doing in private is a stretch that I'm not willing to make. I'm fat, does that give me the right to scream for protection when someone makes hog noises or yells fatso? No. So to ask me to support them in getting special treatment for something that is, in fact, invisible is beyond ridiculous. Homos and heteros need to get a grip and realize not everyone is interested in their peccadillos. So live your life, don't apologize for your existence, but don't shove your sex down my throat.
"We're queer and we're here?" Shove it!
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,803
69
✟279,090.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I myself do not hate gays, as they choose to be called.
Gay used to mean happy, fun loving not homo.
been here? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay found it interesting.

I'm willing to say modest gays who live a quite live and don't run around in drag and holler " were queer and were here live with it" have the troble your talking about,
So as long as they keep in their place (closet door closed and firmly locked) then they have nothing to fear? But if they get noticed it's their fault people harass them? :sorry:

It's Bible wrong and I think it's moraly wrong.
And it's your right to think that.

If you think a round hole is square, then you can think that way. But do not tell me it's true,
Well setting round holes, and square holes aside, it is my right to say "Yes it is true, there are indeed gay Christians." :)
tulc(looking for some coffee!) :sigh:
 
Upvote 0

Mobiosity

American by birth; Southern by the grace of God.
Feb 20, 2007
2,392
210
✟18,555.00
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Private
This article started off, if you recall, with the inability of a group of gay people to drive a bus without having to wash hateful slurs off of it the next morning.
They were on bus trip to take them to Christian college campuses where they knew they weren't welcome because of their sexual activities. Notice I didn't say their sexual orientation. This was hardly a random attack on a tour bus going to see the cherry blossoms in Washington.
 
Upvote 0

IowaLutheran

Veteran
Aug 29, 2004
1,529
110
54
Iowa
✟17,480.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
On the morning of March 8 in Sioux Center, Iowa, a bus parked outside a hotel was found covered with anti-gay slurs, along with a hate-filled message on a piece of cardboard reading: "God does not love feary f*gs."

The bus was one of two that were transporting some 50 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender students, along with supporters, on the start of a two-month trip to 32 Christian colleges with policies that discriminate against those who are not heterosexuals. The Equality Ride, as it is known, organized by Soulforce, had first traveled to Sioux Center to visit Dordt College, a school that counts "sexual activity with someone of the same gender" as possible grounds for "an employee's discharge or a student's dismissal."

I live about an hour away from Sioux Center, so I'm familiar with the people there.

They are very conservative - they are in the reddest county in a red congressional district. However, these acts are not representative of 99% of the people there, as noted by this article:

"Despite the problems at the hotel, eastbound bus coordinator Katie Higgins said Dordt College in Iowa was one of the most hospitable stops on the tour so far. Dordt president Carl Zylstra publicly apologized to the riders on behalf of the town, even though the prior night’s vandalism and harassment were not linked to the school. Higgins said students and faculty debated whether to let the riders on campus, but ultimately welcomed them to hold a panel discussion with students and to make presentations."

http://www.southernvoice.com/2007/3-23/news/national/6685.cfm

The Dordt College maintenance staff helped clean the "hateful" words off the bus, according to DeVries. "We were actually really appreciative," DeVries says. "First off, the university president, when we arrived at Dordt's campus yesterday, apologized sincerely for the actions taken by the community. They helped us clean off the bus and overall our visit with Dordt College went amazingly well. The campus administration was very welcoming...so we've been really appreciative of the way Dordt College has handled things."

http://www.radioiowa.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=3832D595-0450-B847-886110D4C62AAC5B
 
Upvote 0

Mling

Knight of the Woeful Countenance (in training)
Jun 19, 2006
5,815
688
Here and there.
✟9,635.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
They weren't at the school when the bus was tagged. They were on their way, staying in a hotel. And the graffite wasn't "Stay off our campus" or "You're not welcome here," it was slurs that refer only to sexual orientation, and not sexual activity or unwelcome guests.

And again, you are turning the existance of homosexuals into something entirely about sex. They, again, weren't going there to engage in sexual acts, and I would be very surprised if sexual acts played a significant role in any of their discussions. They were going there to talk and discuss. If they weren't welcome (my school banned homosexual acts, but still welcomed the discussion), it was not because they did certain things (because that wasn't what the trip was about), but because they were certain people. And, again, the graffite was not about what they did or where they were, but what they are.

Everything here is about who and what they are--social identity-- not what they do in their bedrooms. I do not understand why people opposed to homosexuality focus so heavily on the sex, to the exclusion of everything else that makes a person human.
 
Upvote 0