• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A couple of perplexing questions

Calminian

Senior Veteran
Feb 14, 2005
6,789
1,044
Low Dessert
✟49,695.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
God's determinative will is never thwarted. He knows the beginning from the end and every thing that happens will always be in accordance with this will. But God also has desires that won't be fulfilled. He is grieved when we sin. Theologians make a distinction between His sovereign will and His moral desire. He desires none should perish (2Pet. 3:9), but has determined that those who reject His forgiveness will perish. He desires that all men are saved and come to the knowledge of the truth( 1Tim. 2:4), but has determined that only believers will be saved.

As parents we can relate to this. In a sense, we have foreknowledge also. We know that children will eventually grow up and have freewill (for certain). We don’t know specifically what they will do, good or bad, but we know for certain they will do good and bad. We don’t know specifically how they will suffer, but we know for certain they will suffer. Yet we have determined not to prevent these inevitabilities and have them anyway. We could easily prevent all evil and suffering by not having children at all. Yet we still have them. We don’t want them to disobey us, but we’ve determined to give them some room to make mistakes. We don’t like to punish them, but have determined to punish when necessary. And we don't desire them to break off all relations with us. But these are the known risks of having children and it is inevitable for some children. We desire them to turn back to us, but determine to allow them the freedom of choice and accept their choice.

So we really can't point the finger at God, without pointing the finger at ourselves.
 
Upvote 0

Koshada

Regular Member
Sep 11, 2005
74
2
78
Kentucky
Visit site
✟243.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
God's determinative will is never thwarted. He knows the beginning from the end and every thing that happens will always be in accordance with this will. But God also has desires that won't be fulfilled. He is grieved when we sin. Theologians make a distinction between His sovereign will and His moral desire. He desires none should perish (2Pet. 3:9), but has determined that those who reject His forgiveness will perish. He desires that all men are saved and come to the knowledge of the truth( 1Tim. 2:4), but has determined that only believers will be saved.

If God knows the beginning from the end and everything in between then why would he even have a desire that wouldn't be fulfilled? Is God a man with a desire that he is in full knowlege of that it can't be?

It would seem to me that He that is complete in himself has no desires. Desires seem to me to be an emotion of the mind of men. If God is in control as one poster here put it, then it seems to me he would know exactly what circumstances and conditions it would take for any and all men to say "Yes Lord". Otherwise, would not the one who believes have room to boast cause he was able to say yes while the other with his conditions and circumstances was only able to say "No"?
 
Upvote 0

ChristIsTHEKing

Active Member
Jan 18, 2006
69
12
56
✟22,776.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Single
If God knows the beginning from the end and everything in between then why would he even have a desire that wouldn't be fulfilled? Is God a man with a desire that he is in full knowlege of that it can't be?

It would seem to me that He that is complete in himself has no desires. Desires seem to me to be an emotion of the mind of men. If God is in control as one poster here put it, then it seems to me he would know exactly what circumstances and conditions it would take for any and all men to say "Yes Lord". Otherwise, would not the one who believes have room to boast cause he was able to say yes while the other with his conditions and circumstances was only able to say "No"?
Once again, free will. We could be robots that are hardwired to obey his every command but that wouldn't be love and His first desire is for us to love Him.
 
Upvote 0

Koshada

Regular Member
Sep 11, 2005
74
2
78
Kentucky
Visit site
✟243.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Once again, free will. We could be robots that are hardwired to obey his every command but that wouldn't be love and His first desire is for us to love Him.

Again, why would God desire something that he knows he can't have? (everyone to love him) As a human, I may desire something I can never have but here we are talking about an all-knowing God who as Calminian says "knows the beginning fron the end and everything in between."

Also you mention 'free will' but how free is our will? Each of us seems born with different brain capacities, handicaps, limitations, parents, geographical enviornments, societies, religious teachings and experiences. At times we seem more like robots running on our own complicated programming received from the world around us.
 
Upvote 0

Calminian

Senior Veteran
Feb 14, 2005
6,789
1,044
Low Dessert
✟49,695.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Again, why would God desire something that he knows he can't have? (everyone to love him)

Because this would be a logically impossibility. It would be like God desiring to make square circles. Love by definition must be free. If He created robots, He would logically sacrifice the possibility of love. Can a computer program love?

Also you mention 'free will' but how free is our will? Each of us seems born with different brain capacities, handicaps, limitations, parents, geographical environments, societies, religious teachings and experiences. At times we seem more like robots running on our own complicated programming received from the world around us.

This is based on materialistic naturalistic assumptions. Indeed there is no scientific explanation for freewill. Most atheists and naturalists reject incompatibilistic models of free will and lean toward compatibilism. But the Bible speaks of a non-material supernatural Creator and of non-material souls that indwell physical bodies which we make moral decisions, not based on material cause/effect concepts, but on moral and purposeful grounds. This is why we accept concepts like morality and purpose. In a deterministic material cause/effect universe these concepts are meaningless. Cause and effect cannot explain right and wrong.

But according to the Bible we are morally accountable for our actions. Any one accepting the concept of morality must logically accept the concept of freedom. It makes utterly no sense apart from it.

On a different subject, your arguments are getting a little confusing to me. You seem to be saying you reject God on the basis of Him being different than you would imagine. If there is a God, shouldn't we let Him describe Himself? In fact I would expect that some of my ideas of Him would be false and in need of correction. After all He's God and we're not. If we decide what the standard for God is, then we make ourselves god. To reject Him based on the fact that my ideas of His nature don't match His actual nature seems flawed at best. What about all the people who's standard for God is going to differ from yours? God must define Himself.
 
Upvote 0

Koshada

Regular Member
Sep 11, 2005
74
2
78
Kentucky
Visit site
✟243.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Because this would be a logically impossibility. It would be like God desiring to make square circles. Love by definition must be free. If He created robots, He would logically sacrifice the possibility of love. Can a computer program love?

Ok. But if I am understanding yoiu then I guess you are still saying that God desires that which he knows he cannot have. Is my understanding of your view correct?


This is based on materialistic naturalistic assumptions. Indeed there is no scientific explanation for freewill. Most atheists and naturalists reject incompatibilistic models of free will and lean toward compatibilism. But the Bible speaks of a non-material supernatural Creator and of non-material souls that indwell physical bodies which we make moral decisions, not based on material cause/effect concepts, but on moral and purposeful grounds. This is why we accept concepts like morality and purpose. In a deterministic material cause/effect universe these concepts are meaningless. Cause and effect cannot explain right and wrong.

But according to the Bible we are morally accountable for our actions. Any one accepting the concept of morality must logically accept the concept of freedom. It makes utterly no sense apart from it.

That you have made very clear. Thanks.

On a different subject, your arguments are getting a little confusing to me. You seem to be saying you reject God on the basis of Him being different than you would imagine. If there is a God, shouldn't we let Him describe Himself? In fact I would expect that some of my ideas of Him would be false and in need of correction. After all He's God and we're not. If we decide what the standard for God is, then we make ourselves god. To reject Him based on the fact that my ideas of His nature don't match His actual nature seems flawed at best. What about all the people who's standard for God is going to differ from yours? God must define Himself.

Forgive me if I seem to be arguing. I have no argument with you or any other here. Understanding is all I seek. It was only my intent to express my thoughts clearly so you could better respond to my questions. No, I do not reject God. My understanding is limited and may be in error so as you, I only seek to understand him more accurately. The description of God I am getting from some others here seem to contradict what has been revealed to me. Therefor, I seek to try to understand where they are coming from and why they believe it is so. I think you are open and have spoken most wisely saying "God must define Himself."
 
Upvote 0

ebia

Senior Contributor
Jul 6, 2004
41,711
2,142
A very long way away. Sometimes even further.
✟54,775.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Greens
Thank you. Yes, I can understand that Love is the power that transforms and not force. That is why I cannot believe that God uses any force directly or indirectly to prove his power or destroy enemies. How can a creation of the creator be an enemy to him?
As I said, it can't be really. For the most part, it really describes those who were enemies of (ancient) Israel, and by extension those who act other than how God would wish them to act.

It seems to me that one who is all powerful and knowing and created all things cannot have his plans obstructed and that by definition all things must already be going in perfect harmony with his plan who knows all. Could it be that men have put words in God's mouth that were not there?
Absolutely. The purpose of the stories has always been to affirm God's saving role for Israel, and through Israel for the world. That doesn't mean that the attrocities ascribed to God therein were actually committed by him.
 
Upvote 0

Calminian

Senior Veteran
Feb 14, 2005
6,789
1,044
Low Dessert
✟49,695.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Ok. But if I am understanding yoiu then I guess you are still saying that God desires that which he knows he cannot have. Is my understanding of your view correct?

Yes I have no problem with that so long and you understand my distinction between determinative will and moral desire. God desires we do not sin, all the while knowing we will. But He's determined we should be free to sin (this is a little simplistic theologically, but conveys the basic idea).

Forgive me if I seem to be arguing. I have no argument with you or any other here. Understanding is all I seek. It was only my intent to express my thoughts clearly so you could better respond to my questions.

No no that's not what I meant at all. You are not arguing in a bad sense. By arguing I simply mean reasoning in positive support for your point of view (even if it's just a hypothetical point of view). This is a good thing. I'm arguing in this sense as well. No apology necessary.

No, I do not reject God. My understanding is limited and may be in error so as you, I only seek to understand him more accurately. The description of God I am getting from some others here seem to contradict what has been revealed to me. Therefor, I seek to try to understand where they are coming from and why they believe it is so. I think you are open and have spoken most wisely saying "God must define Himself."

Thanks you that is much appreciated. Personally I like the way you dialog. (Some here drive me a little nuts. :sigh: ) My goal is to find common ground for us to communicate and argue from premises we both accept. And of course my goal is to reason from the scriptures and provide an accurate description of the God according to it's authors (witnesses). Whether or not you’ll ultimately accept this God is out of my hands, but I at least want to give as much biblical support for His true nature as I can to ensure you have adequate information. Your arguments are important.
 
Upvote 0

Koshada

Regular Member
Sep 11, 2005
74
2
78
Kentucky
Visit site
✟243.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Thanks you that is much appreciated. Personally I like the way you dialog. (Some here drive me a little nuts. :sigh: ) My goal is to find common ground for us to communicate and argue from premises we both accept. And of course my goal is to reason from the scriptures and provide an accurate description of the God according to it's authors (witnesses). Whether or not you’ll ultimately accept this God is out of my hands, but I at least want to give as much biblical support for His true nature as I can to ensure you have adequate information. Your arguments are important.

Thank you. As far as accepting God, ultimately you could say that God is a reality to me. It is not a question of belief in God. Perhaps, I see no need to believe in that which is to me self evident. In my view, Belief is reserved to that which is mentally accepted but may or may not be true. When one is holding the evidence then belief is no longer required.

As far as accepting the discription of God as described in the Bible, I must honestly admit that only the New Testament comes close to my experience of God. Respectfully, I must say that the Old Testament 'to me' reveals more of what 'seems' to be the ego of men than the nature of God. No offence meant as this is just a personal view.

Anyway, thanks so much for all your dialog and explanations and those of ebia and the rest. Your statement of "God must define himself" speaks multitudes to me and strikes a chord within me that rings of truth. I have no further questions 'at this time' but will continue to read any responses that might bring to mind further questions.
 
Upvote 0