The Scripture is what He fulfilled not physics. The nature of heaven is not the same nor was Eden. I have no reason in Scripture or science to think nature was the same in Noah's day either.
False. Name one verse that says physics is the same always. That doesn't even make sense.
That is about the law and prophets...Noses and the prophets..nothing whatsoever to do with gravity and the electromagnetic forces and etc.
It seems to me that is like saying space exists only if it moves. Why not time and space exist and whatever moves moves in time and space?
Ah, the mere measuring of time for man may require stuff moving...clocks. That is one reason why God made the heavens, He spelled that out. To mark time for man. Yet time was here before that, it is just that man would not have had an easy time marking it unless God made the big clocks for us.
If God had not made the stars and sun and moon, that doesn't mean there was no time. We know there was days from the start. That means time. Plants may not have needed the stars and sun to tell time, as they were created before the sun and stars! Yet creatures do, because they came after. One cannot say that the sun moving IS time.
Yet the heavens and earth were created one fine day. Tell us what move or change was there on day one?
No way to prove that one. Since He was here forever, and our universe is just a week's work, I see no reason to assume time never existed before this universe. Maybe not the way we know it in our space time, but that is neither here nor there. Time in some form existed because God knew what a day was.
I have it on good authority that the maths needed is fairly straightforward. There is a difference between proving, mastering, understanding, and comprehending. The difficulty comes in trying to reconcile it with our "common sense" experience of the world. (Because it's probably not possible.)Actually, I hardly understand General Relativity at all, as the equations involve tensors and non-linear partial differentials, and I am still working through the math. Einstein took some time and needed help, and I am not Einstein.
But what aspect do you think is most relevant to the discussion?
As I understand it: Matter and energy are just two ways of interpreting the same thing, and how one perceives it depends on relative motion. And space and time also can be interchangeable as long as symmetry is preserved. Am I in error?
