- Dec 20, 2009
- 28,369
- 7,745
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Married
oh yeah having a form of godliness but denying its power, from such turn away.
Upvote
0
Does it have to be growing to be bad? If intoxicationAre folks really saying that water intoxication is a growing problem like alcohol intoxication?
That really doesn't make any sense.
I recall a couple of times when I had taken in a good amountpeople get addicted to the sensation of drinking water so much that they drink too much of it and their blood cells burst and they die.
I recall a couple of times when I had taken in a good amount
of water in one sitting and it did give me a slight buzz. This
was before I learned about water-intoxication. Now that I
know about it, if I happen to drink too much and get that
light-headed feeling, it makes me a tad nervous.
-
Most Christians here in America hold to a form of OSAS (Once Saved Always Saved). Others hold to the opposite wrong extreme (Which is self directed Works Salvationism). Also, most churches gather in a building that they call a church. When in reality the body of believers is the church. Believers are supposed to gather in small groups within their homes and celebrate the Lord's supper and have close fellowship with one another in the LORD.
And practically everyone in America likes to describe everyone else in specific terms that make them look bad and make him look good.
Protestantism is very similar to Catholicism in many ways too.My apologies. But please know that Eastern Orthodox is very similar to Catholicism in many ways, though.
I'd put it down to ignorance. All I know is that you seem very good at making false assumptions.If we met in person and you did not tell me you were not Catholic, I would have no way of really knowing the difference (Because they are alot a like even though there are some differences).
Protestantism is very similar to Catholicism in many ways too.
I'd put it down to ignorance. All I know is that you seem very good at making false assumptions.
That's good. You have something in common with OrthodoxyMost Protestants believe in Once Saved Always Saved. I am strongly opposed against that.
That's good. You have something in common with Orthodoxy
I think it is more that we don't take our salvation for granted. As Paul said in Philipians 2, "work out your salvation with fear and trembling". If we start to assume its a done deal, then pride starts to take root which, if it takes hold, leaves the door wide open with a welcome mat for the evil one to come and make himself at home.Yes, I have been aware of for a long time that Catholics and Orthodox Churches are against OSAS. But some I have talked with in the RCC camp have claimed you cannot have assurance of your salvation.
I always wonder what people mean when they say they're non-denominational, but that aside, I doubt that most Protestants ARE, in actuality, believers in the concept of Perseverance in Grace. Certainly there are many which do not.Most Protestants believe in Once Saved Always Saved. I am strongly opposed against that. Hence, why I am non-denominational.
I have been aware of for a long time that Catholics and Orthodox Churches are against OSAS. But some I have talked with in the RCC camp have claimed you cannot have assurance of your salvation.
I always wonder what people mean when they say they're non-denominational, but that aside, I doubt that most Protestants ARE, in actuality, believers in the concept of Perseverance in Grace. Certainly there are many which do not.
This statement confuses me in that the second sentence seems to be saying the same thing as the first although the "But" makes it seem as though it's supposed to be an exception to what was said above. Theologically speaking, no Catholic or Orthodox Christian should believe that his salvation is assured. That's just not what their churches teach.
A number of Anglicans on here certainly do not communicate with the dead as suggested.Not all Catholics believe what the church teaches. Anyways, I believe Anglicanism is very similar to Catholicism and Orthodox Churches. They all communicate with the dead which is forbidden in Scripture.
That's true. Was that your point before?Not all Catholics believe what the church teaches.
That's a misconception. But there are SOME similarities, and a "non-denominational" Christian might think that there's a stronger similarity than there is.Anyways, I believe Anglicanism is very similar to Catholicism and Orthodox Churches.
Well, that's flatly wrong. This may be a good example of how people think they see similarities and yet they're just mistaken.They all communicate with the dead
But whether or not you are correct about it being found in the New Testament, MOST Christian churches observe this sacrament, so there's no particular connection between Anglicanism and Roman Catholicism in that. No more than between Anglicanism and Methodist, Presbyterianism, or, for that matter, the non-denominational Churches of Christ and Disciples of Christ. In fact, just about EVERY Christian denomination partakes of the holy meal except for the Quakers and Salvation Army.They also partake of the Eucharist which is a practice not found in the New Testament.
Not all Catholics believe what the church teaches. Anyways, I believe Anglicanism is very similar to Catholicism and Orthodox Churches. They all communicate with the dead which is forbidden in Scripture. They also partake of the Eucharist which is a practice not found in the New Testament.
But some do, though. The point is that there similarities.A number of Anglicans on here certainly do not communicate with the dead as suggested.