I asked first, thanks. Your exact words were "The raw data that exists says the opposite"; I'm asking to see this 'raw data'. Because the last time I checked, we can't even historically confirm the existence of Moses--or the Jews he rescued from Egypt, let alone accurate, specific prophecies. The only ones we have remotely any proof for are the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ.
In any case, I feel as though I have more grounds to be asking about this than you do. I for one have been privy to how often Christians will manipulate the truth to make it seem like they have 'facts', and I am very leery and distrustful of supposed 'evidence' either historical or scientific unless I'm given citations from sources I can look over myself.
A common belief (faith) amoung secularists. No historical data to verify it though.
Easiest way to figure out who the ten emperors of the Roman Empire were. Start at the end of the Roman Empire. 1453 ad. Lop of 1280 years. That is the number given in Daniel regarding the beginning of the reign of that 11th emperor and given 5 more time in Revelation in relationship to the empire. That brings you to 193 ad. The first year of the reign of Septimious Severes. Then check out if he precisely fulfilled the prophecy about that 11th emperor. Not just in a sort of could apply to anyone way. If he PRECISELY FULFILLED that prophecy. If so. Then the ten before him are the ten emperors.
Not trying to be disagreeable to what you said. But what I said is fact. There is no evidence as far as the science surrounding ancient manuscripts and archeology that what he said is true. The raw data that exists says the opposite. His statement just ignorant political talk. It’s why the left got the Bible and surrounding subjects removed from the public schools 50 years ago. So people can make ignorant statements like that and not be looked upon by the culture as stupid and wicked.
So far, you've given us some weird revelations math with no detailed explanation of why/how it works, ad hominem about 'secularism' and making claims about historical data(that you can't even provide yourself)and injecting politics to try and push the argument in your favor.
It's funny that people are so comfortable pointing the finger at 'the nAsTy LibErALs' and secularism, thinking that they're so much worse than we are yet they refuse to take a look at what a mess the church has become. We're a totally divided kingdom--people who ask the 'wrong' questions are scrutinized and have their faith questioned, people in the past and even now use the bible in order to control others and do terrible things and get away with it, many of us act kind and sweet until someone disagrees with us and don't even get me started on the snobbish elitism that takes place in and out of the churches. Last time I checked, forcing someone to abide by Christian values and believe in God 'or else' is not a very biblical or loving concept. Most will only show love to someone that is already 'Christian-like', and just turn everything else into an 'us vs them' scenario.
Oh yeah, and then we've got the Christians that think they're too education on the bible to be wrong about anything and feel totally fine playing mini-God passing judgment onto others and claiming what their intentions are for them.
Yeah, it's not too surprising satan has such a great grasp on people these days. We already do half of his job for him by being such arrogant hypocrites; he infiltrated the church long ago, some people were just too prideful to acknowledge it when he slipped in through the back door.