Truthearthdefender
Active Member
I think that a good number of scientists are gravitating away from the theory of randomness which is about as unsound a scientific theory as one can have. As far as them accepting "Intelligent Design" with the biases that are favored and emphasised by apologists... not so much... I have heard Intelligent Design in the sense that the Fibonacci sequence and "The Flower of Life" aka Sacred Geometry illustrate and quantum scientists are leaning toward intelligent design... but instead of putting God behind the equation they state that there is a mathematical consistency in the design of all things... a much more scientifically sound theory than randomness that created intricately complex regenerating lifeforms.And why do you bet that "if there was one [an intelligent designer], it is nothing like the God portrayed in the Bible"?
Why are you so against the idea of a Holy God as defined in the Christian Bible?
Why do you seem to single this particular Bible (and its teachings) out, and say that THIS one can't be the right one?
Do you have any evidence that says that what the Christian Bible isn't true?
As for whether or not intelligent design was a thing, consider this:
The "Simple Cell", that is, the most basic living organism, the smallest living creature, is made up of thousands of almost robotic-like parts that work in tandem. If you take ANY of these parts away, the thing dies and cannot live. It is the simplest living thing that can possibly exist.
How did it come to be? Did it assemble from amino acids? No, I don't think so, because many of them cannot be sustained outside of a cell. How did the cell come to develop the ability to replicate itself? Ever studied DNA before? It's basically a very complex data file system that can replicate itself, it repairs itself, and it contains vast quantities of data that the organism requires to live.
Are you trying to tell me that this all just...... came to be, snap, out of the blue? That somehow a bunch of non-living goop magically transformed into living cells that have thousands of working parts? Put a single-cell organism under the microscope (a really powerful microscope) and you'll see that even its parts almost look like robots. The little "hairs" that it uses to move around, have parts that almost look like something men have built:
You tell me that this just "came to be", and wasn't designed intelligently. That picture is of a flagella like the ones found in many single-cell organisms, such as bacteria. Now before you say "Oh, that's just an artist's rendition", well...
There's another one.
I just can't sit here and say that there's any doubts in my mind whatsoever that this was designed intelligently.
I may be making absolutely no sense... but I had a great time doing it
Upvote
0