It will be Baldwin for 2008!

[Maynard Keenan]

So where do we set the betting line for percent of the popular vote? I say over/under 0.2%.

 

[LilGeorgiaPeach81]

So where do we set the betting line for percent of the popular vote? I say over/under 0.2%.

Have you not seen the dismal major-party choices we have in this election?

 

[tulc]

Have you not seen the dismal major-party choices we have in this election?

Oh I don't know.
tulc(likes Obama)

 

[LilGeorgiaPeach81]

Chuck Baldwin's speech:


"Let’s be clear: a John McCain Presidency will be no better than a Hillary Clinton or a Barack Obama Presidency. In fact, in many ways, a McCain White House will be WORSE than a Democratic one.
On many issues, there is virtually no distinction between John McCain and any potential Democratic candidate. John McCain is no friend to gun owners. He is no friend to pro-lifers. He is no friend to fiscal conservatives. He is no friend to property owners. He is no friend to "family values" voters. He is no friend to America’s blue-collar workers. He is no friend to small business owners. He is no friend to opponents of illegal immigration.


On the other hand, John McCain is a great friend to Big Business. Similarly, he is a friend to Big Government and Big Brother. He is also a friend to open borders, supranational government, regionalism, and American imperialism.


But this is where the Boogeyman comes in.


At this point, Republican Party lackeys will break in and say, "We can’t let Hillary Clinton win. We can’t let Barack Obama win." Even the favored son of the Religious Right, Mike Huckabee, has endorsed John McCain, not to mention Mitt Romney and virtually every other Republican "bigwig." (Thank God, Ron Paul has maintained his integrity by NOT endorsing McCain.)


I, for one, am fed up with this baloney, because what we are actually faced with is not the "lesser of two evils" but "the evil of two lessers." (To quote a good friend of mine.) And the reason John McCain would actually be a worse President than either Obama or Clinton is because of the manner in which conservatives go to sleep whenever a Republican occupies the Oval Office. Furthermore, the next couple of years are "crunch time" for this burgeoning North American Union and related issues."

 

[scraparcs]

Chuck Baldwin's speech:


"Let’s be clear: a John McCain Presidency will be no better than a Hillary Clinton or a Barack Obama Presidency. In fact, in many ways, a McCain White House will be WORSE than a Democratic one.
On many issues, there is virtually no distinction between John McCain and any potential Democratic candidate. John McCain is no friend to gun owners. He is no friend to pro-lifers. He is no friend to fiscal conservatives. He is no friend to property owners. He is no friend to "family values" voters. He is no friend to America’s blue-collar workers. He is no friend to small business owners. He is no friend to opponents of illegal immigration.


On the other hand, John McCain is a great friend to Big Business. Similarly, he is a friend to Big Government and Big Brother. He is also a friend to open borders, supranational government, regionalism, and American imperialism.


But this is where the Boogeyman comes in.


At this point, Republican Party lackeys will break in and say, "We can’t let Hillary Clinton win. We can’t let Barack Obama win." Even the favored son of the Religious Right, Mike Huckabee, has endorsed John McCain, not to mention Mitt Romney and virtually every other Republican "bigwig." (Thank God, Ron Paul has maintained his integrity by NOT endorsing McCain.)


I, for one, am fed up with this baloney, because what we are actually faced with is not the "lesser of two evils" but "the evil of two lessers." (To quote a good friend of mine.) And the reason John McCain would actually be a worse President than either Obama or Clinton is because of the manner in which conservatives go to sleep whenever a Republican occupies the Oval Office. Furthermore, the next couple of years are "crunch time" for this burgeoning North American Union and related issues."

Great, enjoy President Obama or President Clinton.

 

[Ringo84]

Great, enjoy President Obama or President Clinton.

We will. I can assure you.
Ringo

 

[LilGeorgiaPeach81]

Great, enjoy President Obama or President Clinton.

Well, that is just the bogeyman argument exactly, isn't it. I suppose someone in the 1850's said don't vote for Lincoln, you'll just be electing the Whig.

 

[kiwimac]

Hopefully it will indeed be Obama.

 

[Greeble]

Who decided the Lord chose the Constitution party?

 

[ImmortalTechnique]

Who decided the Lord chose the Constitution party?

it seems possible that God may have ordained the Constitution party take votes from an evil man like John McCain to ensure that a good man like Barack Obama leads the nation

 

[Mongoose]

Who decided the Lord chose the Constitution party?

The Constitution Party did.

 

[Speculative]

Chuck Baldwin's speech:


"Let’s be clear: a John McCain Presidency will be no better than a Hillary Clinton or a Barack Obama Presidency. In fact, in many ways, a McCain White House will be WORSE than a Democratic one. "

Well, at least Baldwin has THAT right!

 

[FaithLikeARock]

I like living in a free country thanks.

 

[Maynard Keenan]

Have you not seen the dismal major-party choices we have in this election?

Nope. I see two good, mostly sane candidates. The lack of a psychotic right winger is just irritating the crazies who think their political opinions are God's will.

 

[Billnew]

With Christian support, Baldwin can easily win Florida, Georgia, and Alabama, and with the will of God behind him can win the election and save America from the wrath of God!

Scarred me. I thought Alec Baldwin or Billy Baldwin was running for president.
I might have nightmares now.

 

[chaz345]

At last the Lord has spoken, through the Constitution Party, and the choice is Chuck Baldwin. The Republicans have rejected the Christian message in selecting their homosexualist anti-family, anti-Christian candidate, and the Democrats did so long ago, but now there is a choice in Chuck Baldwin, who has won the Constitution Party nomination.

With Christian support, Baldwin can easily win Florida, Georgia, and Alabama, and with the will of God behind him can win the election and save America from the wrath of God!

You really need to research what McCain actually believes a little bit more. He opposed a constitutional amendment banning homosexual marriages, not because he supports them but because he takes the truly conservative position that that is not a federal government issue.

 

[ImmortalTechnique]

wow... the America haters will have three good ol' America hating candidates in John McCain, Baldwin, and Bob Barr... who will they pick?

 

[Gremlins]

Well, that is just the bogeyman argument exactly, isn't it. I suppose someone in the 1850's said don't vote for Lincoln, you'll just be electing the Whig.

Comparing Lincoln to the constitution party is hilariously lame for so many reasons.

 

[LilGeorgiaPeach81]

You really need to research what McCain actually believes a little bit more. He opposed a constitutional amendment banning homosexual marriages, not because he supports them but because he takes the truly conservative position that that is not a federal government issue.

Haha, that's just what John Kerry said in 2004. Look where it got him. Without a constitutional amendment, states activist judges can force their citizenry to live with homosexual marriage, so McCain's position will basically let many parts of the US get sucked down the moral gutter.

And since when is opposing tax cuts (as he has in the past and surely will in the future) been conservative? When has supporting restrictions on the right to bear arms, and letting immigrants flood our borders, and eliminating the fundamental Americaness of our country in the name of a free-trade block that will make the US like the west wing of the EU?

 

[scraparcs]

Well, that is just the bogeyman argument exactly, isn't it. I suppose someone in the 1850's said don't vote for Lincoln, you'll just be electing the Whig.

Haha, that's just what John Kerry said in 2004. Look where it got him. Without a constitutional amendment, states activist judges can force their citizenry to live with homosexual marriage, so McCain's position will basically let many parts of the US get sucked down the moral gutter.

And since when is opposing tax cuts (as he has in the past and surely will in the future) been conservative? When has supporting restrictions on the right to bear arms, and letting immigrants flood our borders, and eliminating the fundamental Americaness of our country in the name of a free-trade block that will make the US like the west wing of the EU?

Don't worry, you won't be required to marry another woman.