I meant what I wrote:
"Just as God does. He calls their behavior an "abomination," in fact."
In both the Old and New Testaments certain behaviors are condemned, marking the scriptural prohibitions against such behavior as universal, extending beyond the now-defunct laws of separation and ceremony given specifically to the Israelites of the Old Testament. (See: Romans 1:18-32; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; Jude 1)
Simply repeating yourself doesn't constitute an argument for your views. I've already addressed your point here, to which you appear to have no effective rebuttal.
God hates sin. All of it. Every kind - even the kind around which "minorities" are built. And all those who persist in sin and die in such a state will encounter God, not as a Heavenly Father but as wrathful, holy Judge. Being a member of a minority formed around a particular sort of sin will be no protection at all against the holy wrath of God. And this is, in part, why I detest your virtue-signaling remarks. They pander to sin; they encourage wickedness; they help the lost onward into eternal hell.
Come on, now, you know the difference between a rule and an exception to it. How does one recognize an exception if there is no rule to which it is an exception?
"If the light that is in you be dark, how great is that darkness!"
I'm getting the feeling that reading comprehension isn't your thing... Again, I wrote of many things in my OP. YOU are the one who is doing as you've done here and drawn out a single feature of my remarks. But, as I've already pointed out, this is in the nature of being an ideological "axe-grinder."
Here, too, you appear so used to operating within ideological slogans, labels and superficial thinking that my explanation to you concerning prejudices has gone, apparently, right over your head. Nothing I've observed about prejudice requires that I explain the racism of the KKK. But you would realize this if you'd understood what I wrote.
Do these specious visual/rhetorical maneuvers usually work with others upon whom you use them?
See? Just more word-twisting, more rhetorical deflection. Here's what I wrote - again:
"??? Who has condemned anyone on the basis of being in a minority? I haven't. Sin is the object of condemnation, not numbers."
I am not afraid to call sin what it is. Especially in light of how destructive sin is, if I claim to love God and the lost, I am obliged to speak out against sin. I certainly won't be cowed into silence by some Woke mobster throwing around labels, who wants Christians to applaud hell-bound sinners in their sin as they rush ever-closer to an eternity of darkness and torment.
Proverbs 24:24-25
24 Whoever says to the wicked, “You are in the right,” will be cursed by peoples, abhorred by nations,
25 but those who rebuke the wicked will have delight, and a good blessing will come upon them.
Ephesians 5:5-11
5 For you may be sure of this, that everyone who is sexually immoral or impure, or who is covetous (that is, an idolater), has no inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.
6 Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.
7 Therefore do not become partners with them;
8 for at one time you were darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light
9 (for the fruit of light is found in all that is good and right and true),
10 and try to discern what is pleasing to the Lord.
11 Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.
