Dr. Drew "Gravely Concerned" About Hillary Clinton's Health

[PapaZoom]

FDR disagrees.

He was 50 and outside of his inability to walk without help he was in good health. If he ran at Clinton's age, he would have been several years dead.

 

[PapaZoom]

...huh? Who cares about a candidate's legs?

Her legs are not the problem. It's her character.

 

[Belk]

He was 50 and outside of his inability to walk without help he was in good health. If he ran at Clinton's age, he would have been several years dead.

He still illustrates the point that I wished to make.

 

[brinny]

Her legs are not the problem. It's her character.

Actually, it's both.

 

[Cearbhall]

Her legs are not the problem. It's her character.

Tell that to Brinny, then, not me.

 

[Cimorene]

He was 50 and outside of his inability to walk without help he was in good health. If he ran at Clinton's age, he would have been several years dead.

Thank God for vaccines & modern meds so that people can live longer now.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

He was 50

At a time when life expectancy was 60 for men.

 

[PapaZoom]

He still illustrates the point that I wished to make.

As a younger man he was able to work through his health issues. As an older man (younger than Clinton is now) he died as a result of his health issues. So your argument only works if you factor OUT the age of both people with whom you're comparing. But if you factor in age, which you should, then FDR is dead from his health issues and there is nothing to compare. JFK had health issues too but he was 35 which gives him a huge advantage in spite of his many problems. Clinton is an old lady who likely wears diapers. Her health issues are likely hidden from us. She is dolled up for the camera. She hasn't had a press conference in nearly a year. She's hardly available to the public. She's hiding. Keeping her distance. Perhaps that's because if we get a real good look, we'll see she's not physically up to the job. My guess is that she'll get elected and after just two years she'll wear down and possibly out. If she's not impeached first.

 

[PapaZoom]

Tell that to Brinny, then, not me.

She read it. Hillary's biggest illness is her terrible moral character. She is a sociopath. So is Charles Manson. They have that in common. Both are liars of the worst kind. Aside from her physical problems, her lack of moral character should be the biggest concern.

 

[PapaZoom]

At a time when life expectancy was 60 for men.

Then it's even more a terrible comparison.

 

[Cearbhall]

Then it's even more a terrible comparison.

No, I think you've got your logic wires crossed there.

 

[GoldenBoy89]

Then it's even more a terrible comparison.

Is it? It seems to be perfectly analogous to me.

 

[Picky Picky]

She read it. Hillary's biggest illness is her terrible moral character. She is a sociopath. So is Charles Manson. They have that in common. Both are liars of the worst kind. Aside from her physical problems, her lack of moral character should be the biggest concern.

I don't know whether this is an Internet thing or an American thing or both, but the comparison of Mrs Clinton to Charles Manson is not just totally unjustified, not just totally ludicrous, not just totally stupid, but the kind of empty, vicious, pointless, mindless, wicked rhetoric that actually endangers democracy. Pull yourself together and consider the requirements of truth, of justice, of honesty, and of charity.

 

[PapaZoom]

No, I think you've got your logic wires crossed there.

I may have short-circuited

 

[PapaZoom]

Is it? It seems to be perfectly analogous to me.

Ohhhh, good word! Yeah, you're probably right. Sometimes you just gotta throw out an objection and see if it sticks.

 

[PapaZoom]

I don't know whether this is an Internet thing or an American thing or both, but the comparison of Mrs Clinton to Charles Manson is not just totally unjustified, not just totally ludicrous, not just totally stupid, but the kind of empty, vicious, pointless, mindless, wicked rhetoric that actually endangers democracy. Pull yourself together and consider the requirements of truth, of justice, of honesty, and of charity.

I read that on some site that was defining sociopath. It's factual. Hillary's lies are part of a serious pathology. She did nothing wrong even in light of evidence to the contrary. Charles Manson did the same thing. He lied in spite of clear evidence to the contrary.

Nice use of adjectives. I'm impressed.

 

[Picky Picky]

I read that on some site that was defining sociopath. It's factual. Hillary's lies are part of a serious pathology. She did nothing wrong even in light of evidence to the contrary. Charles Manson did the same thing. He lied in spite of clear evidence to the contrary.

Nice use of adjectives. I'm impressed.

I read that on some site ... It's factual. Rubbish. Internet-truth.

You are a Christian. Listen to yourself.

I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think that you may be mistaken.

 

[Cearbhall]

I read that on some site that was defining sociopath. It's factual. Hillary's lies are part of a serious pathology.

Thank goodness that's not how people are actually diagnosed.

 

[PapaZoom]

Thank goodness that's not how people are actually diagnosed.

Well if you look at what constitutes a sociopath, Hillary falls well within the characteristics.

 

[PapaZoom]

I read that on some site ... It's factual. Rubbish. Internet-truth.

You are a Christian. Listen to yourself.

I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think that you may be mistaken.

Mistaken about what? That Clinton is a liar? That's been proven. And mistaken about the characteristics of a sociopath? That's defined already. Hillary is a sociopath by definition. But that's just my opinon. Which is what we do here on the old discussion forum.

beseech and bowels, I'm still chucking at the use of those two words. Do people really talk that way today?