R
Revlog
Guest
Hello Lamad. Sorry that I'm very late in replying to you, but things have been (and continue to be) busy for me.
First, I'll say that your view is consistent, and I can't say with certainly that you are wrong or that I am right. However, I still prefer my own view (which I also think is consistent) and I still have difficulty with some aspects of yours:
Your view:
IMO, you are fighting against the structure of the book as laid out by John in Rev 1:19 - Therefore write the things which you have seen, and the things which are, and the things which will take place after these things."
The "things which are" correspond with the seven messages to the churches in chapters 2 and 3, which is the church age. Then, chapter 4 clearly marks the end of "the things which are" and the beginning of "the things which will take place after these things", Rev 4:1 "After these things I looked, and behold, a door standing open in heaven, and the first voice which I had heard, like the sound of a trumpet speaking with me, said, Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after these things.. I take it that "after these things" must be the "end of the church age".
I don't see how God would say to John that the "things which take place after these things" include something (~32 AD) that happened long before John even received this vision.
My view:
The first seal rider is depicted on the white horse, armed, bearing a crown, and with intent to conquer. He is depicted this way because he is a counterfeit christ. The true Christ shall also come (later; chapter 19) on a white horse, armed, bearing a crown, and with intent to conquer.
However, there are important differences. The false christ is lightly armed (a bow) compared to Christ (sword, eyes of fire, a rod of iron to shatter nations). Also, the crown worn by the 1st seal rider is a wreath-style "victor's crown", and we shall see his victories in Rev 11:7 and Rev 13:7. The crown worn by Christ is a diadem crown indicating absolute authority (confirmed by his title, king of kings).
Here, I have trouble accepting that the unbelieving world is going to be fleeing to the mountains because know about these Biblical prophecies, or because they know that the Day of the Lord is beginning.
My view:
I think the unbelieving world will remain ignorant about the prophecies. They will not be expecting prophecies to be fulfilled. This is why Christ's return, to them, is likened to the coming of a thief. This is why the Day of the Lord is likened to the days of Noah (sudden and shocking). This is why Paul says they will be saying "peace and safety" moments before destruction comes.
The sixth seal says the people will be fleeing from the presence [lit. the "face"] of the one on the throne and the Lamb. They are fleeing because they are seeing something. This is Isaiah 2 being fulfilled -- they are seeing the glory of His majesty (Isa 2:21).
I agree that God has great mercy, which is why the trumpets are limited and why they progressively get worse.
I also agree (generally) with your wise professor in that Revelation should be the primary text regarding the end times.
My view:
That the trumpets are full of mercy tells me that they are not yet the time of God's wrath. Rather, they are a time of warning. During the time of the trumpets, I believe that the gospel is still be spread by the 144,000 Jews, by the testimony of martyred Christians, and the two witnesses in Jerusalem. These saints should not be on the earth when God's wrath begins, but it has always been God's nature to give warning after warning before delivering His wrath. The trumpets are the final "warning shots".
As for your professor, I would only add that while Revelation provides the greatest contextual information about the end times, I don't think it's intended to be understandable to anyone who hasn't already read what the prophets (including Christ) said about the end times. On the other hand, one should certainly read Revelation before adopting any particular eschatological stance such as pre-trib, post-trib, pre-mil, post-mil, etc.
Sixth seal: Rev 6:18 - Then the kings of the earth and the great men and the commanders and the rich and the strong and every slave and free man hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains
Armies of nations destroyed in battle of Armageddon: Rev 19:17-19 - Come, assemble for the great supper of God, so that you may eat the flesh of kings and the flesh of commanders and the flesh of mighty men and the flesh of horses and of those who sit on them and the flesh of all men, both free men and slaves, and small and great. And I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to make war against Him who sat on the horse and against His army.
I have problems with the two-earthquake view. The prophets describe one such quake. A hugely powerful earthquake (e.g. the 9.0 in Japan) might move one island a few inches or feet yet cause utter devastation in that region. However, an earthquake powerful enough to cause all mountains and all islands to be moved from their places will be an incomprehensible disaster. From such a quake, there would be no short term recovery whereby the nations continue to function for a few more years.
My view:
I believe there can only be one such quake, and it must occur right at the end, in conjuction with Christ's visible return in wrath, which is just as the prophets described it. The two accounts of this one quake tell us that the the islands and mountains will be moved from their places, all the cities will fall, and by the time it's over, the mountains and islands will have all been destroyed.
During this time, two specific Jews will emerge as Israel's leaders and representatives in Jerusalem for 1260 days. They too will be devinely protected by God. However, 3 1/2 days before their 1260 days of service are finished, God will allow them to be killed, and remain dead for the 3 1/2 days.
They will be resurrected at the conclusion of the 1260 days. I think this event will also be a visible sign of the dead being raised in general, to be shortly followed by the rapture, in accordance with 1 Thes 4:15-17.
At that point, there will no longer be any saints upon the earth. This will be the right moment for the wrath of God to strike the earth. That's exactly what the bowls are (Rev 15:1, 15:7, 16:1).
I'm trying to decide if we agree or not, but I think you are making it more complicated than it needs to be.
There is one great promise that remains unfulfilled, and that is the promise that the kingdom of God would reign on earth. The prophets spoke about it. Jesus spoke about it. He said His kingdom is not of this world, but that it would come. He taught his disciples to pray for it: "thy kingdom come, thy will be one on earth as it is in heaven". In his last conversation with his disciples before his ascension (Acts 1) he told them that the kingdom would come only at a time known to the father. Until then, Satan will have his (usurped and temporary) kingdom on the earth.
What do we see in chapter 5?
- We see the Father initiating an event by producing this scroll and handing it to the Lamb.
- We see the Lamb introduced as the root of David and lion of Judah, which emphasize his right to inherit David's earthly throne.
- We see the Lamb praised as worthy to receive the scroll because he purchased men with his own blood to become a kingdom.
- We see that this means he is worthy to receive power, honor and glory -- which are the same things the Father receives as king in heaven (chapter 4).
- We see John weep for a moment, indicating that John knew what the scroll represented (and so should we).
Could it not be more plain that this scroll must represent the fulfillment of this promised coming kingdom? John was weeping because it appeared that this great promise might not happen, which means that unrighteousness will reign forever, and there is no victory, and no ultimate justice.
When John was weeping, I don't think he was thinking in terms of a title need or lease document. He was thinking of the kingdom.
First, I'll say that your view is consistent, and I can't say with certainly that you are wrong or that I am right. However, I still prefer my own view (which I also think is consistent) and I still have difficulty with some aspects of yours:
[Re: The seal events]
I believe we are between the 5th and 6th seal, waiting on the rapture as the first event of the 6th seal. Seals 1 -4 were broken as soon as Jesus ascended into heaven...so around 32 AD.
No, the first seal is RIGHTEOUS. John used the color white 17 times in Revelation to represent righteousness; he did not change in this one instance. The first seal is to represent the CHURCH sent out to make disciples of all nations.
Your view:
IMO, you are fighting against the structure of the book as laid out by John in Rev 1:19 - Therefore write the things which you have seen, and the things which are, and the things which will take place after these things."
The "things which are" correspond with the seven messages to the churches in chapters 2 and 3, which is the church age. Then, chapter 4 clearly marks the end of "the things which are" and the beginning of "the things which will take place after these things", Rev 4:1 "After these things I looked, and behold, a door standing open in heaven, and the first voice which I had heard, like the sound of a trumpet speaking with me, said, Come up here, and I will show you what must take place after these things.. I take it that "after these things" must be the "end of the church age".
I don't see how God would say to John that the "things which take place after these things" include something (~32 AD) that happened long before John even received this vision.
My view:
The first seal rider is depicted on the white horse, armed, bearing a crown, and with intent to conquer. He is depicted this way because he is a counterfeit christ. The true Christ shall also come (later; chapter 19) on a white horse, armed, bearing a crown, and with intent to conquer.
However, there are important differences. The false christ is lightly armed (a bow) compared to Christ (sword, eyes of fire, a rod of iron to shatter nations). Also, the crown worn by the 1st seal rider is a wreath-style "victor's crown", and we shall see his victories in Rev 11:7 and Rev 13:7. The crown worn by Christ is a diadem crown indicating absolute authority (confirmed by his title, king of kings).
Your view:[Re: sixth seal]
The sixth seal describes the SIGNS for the Day. Those people crying for the rocks to fall on them KNEW the prophecies of Joel 2 and Isaiah 2, so they KNEW the Day of the Lord was imminent.
They want to hide because they have just seen the signs and they KNOW the Day of the Lord is imminent. It should be obvious they all were NOT killed by falling rocks! This is not the END. It is not real stars that fall to the earth. It is angelic beings or it is a meteor shower. The earthquake will be bad, no doubt, and worldwide. But it will not be as bad as the earthquake at the 7th vial.
Here, I have trouble accepting that the unbelieving world is going to be fleeing to the mountains because know about these Biblical prophecies, or because they know that the Day of the Lord is beginning.
My view:
I think the unbelieving world will remain ignorant about the prophecies. They will not be expecting prophecies to be fulfilled. This is why Christ's return, to them, is likened to the coming of a thief. This is why the Day of the Lord is likened to the days of Noah (sudden and shocking). This is why Paul says they will be saying "peace and safety" moments before destruction comes.
The sixth seal says the people will be fleeing from the presence [lit. the "face"] of the one on the throne and the Lamb. They are fleeing because they are seeing something. This is Isaiah 2 being fulfilled -- they are seeing the glory of His majesty (Isa 2:21).
Your view:[Re: trumpets]
God has great mercy, and begins with trumpet judgments that are held back: only 1/3 when compared to the associated vial judgment. His wrath seems PROGRESSIVE; as men continue to refuse to repent, the judgment gets worse.
A wise bible college professor said once, if we wish to keep our doctrine straight, we should FORM our doctrine on the most complete treatise found on a subject, then fill in missing pieces from minor scriptures on that subject. For end times, that most complete treatise is the book of Revelation. There are 9 chapters on the 70th week of Daniel.
He went on to say that when possible we should form our doctrine on LATER revelations versus earlier revelations, since God is a self-revealing God and over time keeps revealing MORE. Again, Revelation is where we must form our end times doctrine, and fill in missing pieces from the Old Testament scriptures. Daniel might be an exception.
I agree that God has great mercy, which is why the trumpets are limited and why they progressively get worse.
I also agree (generally) with your wise professor in that Revelation should be the primary text regarding the end times.
My view:
That the trumpets are full of mercy tells me that they are not yet the time of God's wrath. Rather, they are a time of warning. During the time of the trumpets, I believe that the gospel is still be spread by the 144,000 Jews, by the testimony of martyred Christians, and the two witnesses in Jerusalem. These saints should not be on the earth when God's wrath begins, but it has always been God's nature to give warning after warning before delivering His wrath. The trumpets are the final "warning shots".
As for your professor, I would only add that while Revelation provides the greatest contextual information about the end times, I don't think it's intended to be understandable to anyone who hasn't already read what the prophets (including Christ) said about the end times. On the other hand, one should certainly read Revelation before adopting any particular eschatological stance such as pre-trib, post-trib, pre-mil, post-mil, etc.
I disagree, although it might not be obvious unless you make the connection:[Re: Clarification of the 6th seal]
I don't follow you on your 6th seal comment. There are no armies to be seen at the 6th seal.....unless you are trying to rearrange the book!
Sixth seal: Rev 6:18 - Then the kings of the earth and the great men and the commanders and the rich and the strong and every slave and free man hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains
Armies of nations destroyed in battle of Armageddon: Rev 19:17-19 - Come, assemble for the great supper of God, so that you may eat the flesh of kings and the flesh of commanders and the flesh of mighty men and the flesh of horses and of those who sit on them and the flesh of all men, both free men and slaves, and small and great. And I saw the beast and the kings of the earth and their armies assembled to make war against Him who sat on the horse and against His army.
Your view:[Re: Comparison of earthquakes]
The earthquake will be bad, no doubt, and worldwide. But it will not be as bad as the earthquake at the 7th vial.
This last earthquake makes the mountains DISAPPEAR!
I have problems with the two-earthquake view. The prophets describe one such quake. A hugely powerful earthquake (e.g. the 9.0 in Japan) might move one island a few inches or feet yet cause utter devastation in that region. However, an earthquake powerful enough to cause all mountains and all islands to be moved from their places will be an incomprehensible disaster. From such a quake, there would be no short term recovery whereby the nations continue to function for a few more years.
My view:
I believe there can only be one such quake, and it must occur right at the end, in conjuction with Christ's visible return in wrath, which is just as the prophets described it. The two accounts of this one quake tell us that the the islands and mountains will be moved from their places, all the cities will fall, and by the time it's over, the mountains and islands will have all been destroyed.
I think it's close to my view, although I don't see the 3 1/2 days referring to a time before the abomination. I think the abomination will initiate an attack on Israel, with many Jews being captured or killed. However, some will flee to the mountains to the east as Christ (and Zechariah) instructed them, and they will receive protection during the 1290 days that follow.[Re: The two witnesses]
Not "somewhere!" The man of sin will show up in Jerusalem 3 1/2 days before the abomination. Then the two witnesses show up BECAUSE the man of sin showed up. It makes good sense: how could he walk into the temple if he is not even in Jerusalem? Rev. 11:1-2 shows his arrival. Verse 3 shows the two witnesses show up moments later. They will testify for 1260 days, which will take them to 3 1/2 days before the 7th vial ends the week. They will lie dead for 3 1/2 days, then be raised at the 7th vial when ALL the Old Testament saints will raise.
During this time, two specific Jews will emerge as Israel's leaders and representatives in Jerusalem for 1260 days. They too will be devinely protected by God. However, 3 1/2 days before their 1260 days of service are finished, God will allow them to be killed, and remain dead for the 3 1/2 days.
They will be resurrected at the conclusion of the 1260 days. I think this event will also be a visible sign of the dead being raised in general, to be shortly followed by the rapture, in accordance with 1 Thes 4:15-17.
At that point, there will no longer be any saints upon the earth. This will be the right moment for the wrath of God to strike the earth. That's exactly what the bowls are (Rev 15:1, 15:7, 16:1).
[The meaning of the seven-sealed scroll of chapter 5]
You are right on the IMMENSE importance of the scroll: it is the title deed or lease document of planet earth, between Adam and God. Satan usurped that 6000 year lease. AT the 7th trumpet, that 6000 years are ENDED. That is why the kingdoms are transferred to Jesus and why Michael can go after Satan to take him DOWN. The lease he usurped is ENDED. The truth is, if no one had been found worthy to break the seals, Satan would remain god of this world forever. THANK GOD Jesus was found worthy! When the seals are broken and the scroll unrolled, THEN, and only then, can the events INSIDE come to pass: the trumpets and the vials and finally Jesus return to earth.
I'm trying to decide if we agree or not, but I think you are making it more complicated than it needs to be.
There is one great promise that remains unfulfilled, and that is the promise that the kingdom of God would reign on earth. The prophets spoke about it. Jesus spoke about it. He said His kingdom is not of this world, but that it would come. He taught his disciples to pray for it: "thy kingdom come, thy will be one on earth as it is in heaven". In his last conversation with his disciples before his ascension (Acts 1) he told them that the kingdom would come only at a time known to the father. Until then, Satan will have his (usurped and temporary) kingdom on the earth.
What do we see in chapter 5?
- We see the Father initiating an event by producing this scroll and handing it to the Lamb.
- We see the Lamb introduced as the root of David and lion of Judah, which emphasize his right to inherit David's earthly throne.
- We see the Lamb praised as worthy to receive the scroll because he purchased men with his own blood to become a kingdom.
- We see that this means he is worthy to receive power, honor and glory -- which are the same things the Father receives as king in heaven (chapter 4).
- We see John weep for a moment, indicating that John knew what the scroll represented (and so should we).
Could it not be more plain that this scroll must represent the fulfillment of this promised coming kingdom? John was weeping because it appeared that this great promise might not happen, which means that unrighteousness will reign forever, and there is no victory, and no ultimate justice.
When John was weeping, I don't think he was thinking in terms of a title need or lease document. He was thinking of the kingdom.
Upvote
0