Yep it is working well now isn't it?
The gun laws are already in place, obviously the problem is enforcing them. You can make all the laws you want, but if you can't enforce them what good is it?Can we do both, study murderers and what makes them tick and strengthen our gun laws in the areas of background checks and registration, concurrently?
How? If a criminal wants a gun, all they got to do is steal one. The only people who are going to register guns... maybe... are law abiding citizens. Everyone else are going to ignore the law. People drive cars so these are out in the open and easier to enforce. Same as real estate. Guns are easily hidden. What you are you going to do? Invade every home and see who has what guns? You are asking for a law that is impossible to enforce, without violating people's basic rights; and even if you are willing to violate people's basic rights, I don't think it is even possible then.No, it isn't, because it doesn't exist. There is not registration program (barring machineguns, penguins and the like) for firearms today. If we had one, we could do a much better job of keeping guns aways from lunatics and felons.
No what it would do is send innocent people to jail. Besides all you got to do if you decide to sell your gun(s) under the table is file a report with the police claiming that they were stolen.Under current law, it is very difficult to prosecute those who illegally traffic guns. "I sold it to some guy" and "I bought it from some guy" are effective defences today for not having a gun you bought new and for how you obtained a stolen firearm. A registration system would empower our law enforcement agents to effectively prosecute privates dealers who cater to bardo wells and straw-buyers, something that is very difficult to do today.
No what it would do is send innocent people to jail. Besides all you got to do if you decide to sell your gun(s) under the table is file a report with the police claiming that they were stolen.
Because other countries take care of the mentally ill unlike us.That doesn't answer the root "why" that I was getting at. Why doesn't this happen as often per capita in Belgium? In Japan?
And they don't have the media, liberal rhetoric, and Obama on purpose inciting them, who are mentally ill.Because other countries take care of the mentally ill unlike us.
Those who had already sold their guns before the law is instituted. Or those who have given guns as gifts. Or those who had guns stolen that didn't know about it.Which innocent people would it send to jail?
A stolen report, faked, is a better lead than no paper trail at all is, and that is what exists today.
Every mental formation--anger, jealousy, despair, etc.--is sensitive to mindfulness the way all vegetation is sensitive to sunshine. By cultivating the energy of mindfulness, you can heal your body and your consciousness. - Thich Nhat Hanh
Those who had already sold their guns before the law is instituted. Or those who have given guns as gifts. Or those who had guns stolen that didn't know about it.
What a weird comment. If you don't like freedom, perhaps another country would be a better place to live.
I think that whatever environmental triggers that create potential mass murderers has increased. I'm assuming that there has been a study to determine what these could be; but then again most MMs are murder/suicides. So maybe they have been unable to do so.
Our society is getting much better at producing men and women who have mental disorders. If the government is going to throw money at this problem, I think they need to finance studies to figure out what makes a mass murderer, and then perhaps we can come up with a solution.