Thankfully, with outstanding eternal PRAISE TO YHWH THE FATHER IN HEAVEN and Y'SHUA'S FAITHFULNESS, my SALVATION does not depend AT ALL on my understanding , ESPECIALLY concerning these questions, nor the purpose or the goals of the questions.
There seems to be a real reluctance to be completely forthright with a display of exactly what the OP's view of the entire "salvation process" really is. Since IMO none but the most gullible will have the patience to play by his rules until the end - it seems to me that we may never fully understand his theology.
Having said that - I gather from a previous post that where he is going has something to do with the idea that only one of the 4 people we are told about in the parable of the soils was "successful" in his quest for salvation. All others, as has been clearly said
"failed" in their quest to get to the point where they were "sealed by the Holy Spirit". "making Christ his" and the like.
Many don't agree with me that the Lord loves and has an eternal use for the likes of the middle two persons in the parable - even though they did not achieve the highest height in their walk with the Lord over their lifetime.
The idea of the OP seems to be (who could know for sure
) that, if a person teaches that a person is "sealed" at the beginning of his Christian walk, he would than have to be "unsealed" when he "failed" and that doesn't make sense due to the nature of what "sealed" means.
The entire theology then would be predicated and dependent on the idea that it is
we humans who "succeed or fail" in our quest to "fulfill pisteuo" by "faithing" or whatever other term a person uses for a really surrendered walk with the Lord.
If that really is the concept being put forth (who can really know because of the games involved) - that concept of salvation is fatally flawed for the simple reason that God is the author and finisher of our faith (from start to finish) and not us.
God does not "fail" in His quest to bring us through to the end. Understanding that simple fact is the entire reason that the Lord goes out of His way to tell us that we are "sealed" at the beginning of our walk with Him.
All of epistles are written to people who have been "saved", "sealed", "seated with Him", "made part of His body", and all the rest of such things
"already" (note the "ed" on the end of all those words). The people Paul and the other apostles are writing to are not "hoping" for those things. They are not trying "not to fail" in their quest for such things. It's a done deal in God's mind and has been since before the foundation of the world.
The reason I feel and charge that "another gospel" is being preached here is because the concept used as a basis for the understanding of the "salvation process" in his gospel is so deeply flawed that it can never be part correct understanding of the true gospel.
I suppose that I could be "misrepresenting" the beliefs of the OP. But how would I know since he won't come out and tell any but the most susceptible to false teachings exactly what those beliefs are?
If he does and I am wrong in my assessment - I will gladly and openly recant any of my wrong representations of his positions.