The Administration Of Tongues

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,244
1,767
The land of OZ
✟322,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Yes and it does appear that our cessationist friends have withdrawn for a time where I hope that they wlll take a good look at the material that we've been supplying.
One can always HOPE 'that'. But my experience is that those you are most 'hopeful' for, aren't here to 'seek the truth', they are here 'seeking to win' because they think they already know the truth.

I will have to hold to the accepted position regarding the use of S/spirit especially as it relates to Rom 8:26 as there is simply far too much Biblical and lexical evidence to change.
See, now I can only 'hope' for you too then. ^_^

The Tyndale NT (1534) and the Bishops NT (1595) certainly both have Spirit in the lower case as does the KJV (1611) but not the KJV (1769). The Bishops NT seems to only use spirit and not Spirit when it refers to the Holy Spirit throughout the NT. The Tyndale appears to be the same where maybe this was symptomatic of the period where they seemed to know and experience little of the Holy Spirit in their meetings. It's interesting how the revisers of the KJV (1769) moved away from this earlier 1611 convention to where they have attempted to capitlise S/spirit appropriately.
Read the bold. I'll 'hope' for them also. Because, that's the problem I have with translations. What grammatical base do they 'attempt to' do it by? Or is it Pretext-context-biblical TEXT? I honestly don't know. Bullinger does a lot with the presence of the definite article. If 'the' is in the Greek it's Him/Spirit. If it's not, then it's our/spirit generally speaking. Nothing is ever 100% though, and I think that just makes God just at us. Reminds me of a seminar where Jack Taylor was speaking in Dallas.

Jack said; "When man decided to 'INVENT THEOLOGY'...or, 'the study of God', I'm pretty sure that God just, sit back, breathed out (His Spirit?), and said to Himself; "Oh Boy, this ought to be good." :doh:
(His Spirit?) above, was me. ;)

But as I shared last time, Bullinger feels that in the book of Romans, and particularly 8:26, the definite article litmus kinda changes with the new nature of a born again spirit, in the Romans story line..(my opinion of his thinking...uh, I think). Our spirit becomes one with the Lord's which is of the same essence as The Spirit. I'm confused earlier in Romans though with;

ROM 8:9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
10 And if Christ be in you, the body is dead because of sin; but the Spirit is life because of righteousness.
11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you.


Concerning "his Spirit" at the en of verse 11, the interlinear says "the indwelling OF HIM Spirit."

I'm of the persuasion that this is not talking about The Spirit of God, but the spirit of the Jesus. The same spirit which vivified his body, and in which he went and preached to the spirits of them who died in the pre-deluvian age.

When it comes to an lexical study of the Holy Spirit, even though the afore mentioned books by Keener and Thiselton are indespensable, I probably need to add in a third book by Fee titled God's Empowering Presence which has becom a virtual standard for any study on the Holy Spirit, both from a lexical and a theological perspective.
Fee applied 7 pages to Rom 8:26 and due to copyright limitations I will only provide one page of his material which is contained in the 'spoiler'. I enjoy using this BBcode option as it allows a long post to look reasonably short, or where people can easily pass the material by if it doesn't interest them.

God's Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul, Gordon D. Fee (1996) pgs.612-13

2. The present sentences, in fact, correspond remarkably with what Paul elsewhere calls “praying with/in the Spirit” (1 Cor 14:14-15; Eph 6:18).326 These correspondences occur at two crucial points: (a) the Spirit is the subject of the verb “interceding,” that is, the Spirit himself is seen as praying from within us and (b) the persons involved do not understand what the Spirit is saying—or not saying, as the case may be.

When we turn to Paul’s other notations about prayer, especially private prayer, besides the prayer reports of various kinds (which describe intelligible praying), we have especially the description of his own prayer life in 1 Cor 14:14-15, that it is of two kinds: praying with his mind and praying with his S/spirit. Although this text is too allusive for us to know for sure what “praying with his mind” meant,
A dichotomist's dilemma maybe, but not for this trichotomist. :clap:

The Bishops NT seems to only use spirit and not Spirit when it refers to the Holy Spirit throughout the NT. The Tyndale appears to be the same where maybe this was symptomatic of the period where they new and experienced little of the Holy Spirit in their meetings.
OR they weren't Pentecostal and didn't have the Spirit's presence in their life, to help 'more' in their translational endeavors. Thereby leaving them to lean more on their own soul-ish abilities to translate....IMO. And, in being honest with themselves they knew that 'they really didn't know' whether it should be capitalized or not.

The reason for this is probably two-fold in that as contemporary scholarship has far surpassed that of old and where the newer better commentaries are highly peer-reviewed, this allows me to encounter the 'best-of-the-best' where I am able to consider all the options so to speak.
Not even a journey I want to take, but do love to hear about your view from the tip of the informational iceberg.

As I also use BibleWorks 9, this program provides me with about six Greek lexicons and upward of about 30 Bible translations so this gives me the benefit of being able to obtain a lot of raw data regarding a specific Greek word. Of course the free www.biblehub.com is a superb resource as well.
I'm impressed and overwhelmed. I'm in the IT dark ages and simply big on, a heart for God. And a heavy dependence on him for that same reason. The 'true' depths of God will never be plumbed any deeper with the 'mind of man' than the man that has not, 'the mind' but 'a heart for' God. :idea:

Thankyou. For my paper editions of my commentaries I use ABBYY FineReader 12 Pro to scan them into an electronic format and I use the free Logos utility 'Shibboleth' which allows me to correctly format any Greek (and Hebrew) words that can often be lost in transition. So all I have to do is to pick an appropriate article, scan it and check any Greek references and paste it into the forum - it's easy once someone shows you what tools are availble.
It's also easy to drown when you can't swim. Even if someone 'shows' you how. Sorry, old dog dialogue kicking against the IT goad.

For me, both the Dichotomist and Trichotomist positions had me confused for years where I tended to switch sides every so often. Now that I am a functional-Dichotomist the world now makes sense for me!
All this quote needs to be perfect, is an IMO at the end. IMO anyway. :amen:

PS If you respond, please try to be short. It took me til now to get through this one post. And it hasn't even been that busy at the office. I'm just that slow. :(
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,953
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Why do so many people fake speaking in tongues?
Why do people need "catchers" when God knocks them off their feet? Isn't He able to put them down gently?
Paul didn't seem to be hurt, even though he was knocked off of a horse.
 
Upvote 0

Alithis

Disciple of Jesus .
Nov 11, 2010
15,750
2,180
Mobile
✟101,992.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
^_^I'm not too crazy about snakes myself.
Nor do I intend to drink any poisoned kool aid.
Still, both of those things were among the signs you mentioned, yes?
If you have the holy spirit with all those signs, you ought to be able to (gulp) handle snakes, although I do not blame you if you don't-
And drink poison, although I do not recommend it.

As I say, I have friends who were involved in the Toronto thing. It did not turn out well for them.
Did you know that Satan can transform himself to appear as an angel of light?
I am convinced that the spirit behind this stuff is not holy...
i think your not viewing this well. did paul purposely seek out a snake and take it up ..nope he was about the business at hand and a snake latched onto his hand ..
not his wil not his doing .
who is that heals people ..? it is the lord
by whose authority are demons cast out ? it is the Lords
by the power of whose Spirit do we speak in tongues ?it is the Lords
there is no directive to go drink poison or take up serpents by our own volition .. eve mose did not pick up the serpent until God told him too .we learn to act according to his will not our own .
but lets be honest here .. you focussed attention onto the snakes to avoid the truth that i testified of the other three signs in the name of the lord Jesus .

but there is confusion so i will ask straight up front asd i often do many folks (it's simply the best way )it also makes it clear where folks are coming from.

have you been baptised in the promised Holy Ghost ? (if so how do you know )
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,953
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
You do know that the Holy Spirit is given to every single person who is baptized?
And you know that there is but one faith, one Lord...and yes, only one baptism?
You know that the only One Who may legitimately claim to have a "special anointing from God" is Jesus, right?

I mean, you are aware of these things, I'm sure.
 
Upvote 0

Alithis

Disciple of Jesus .
Nov 11, 2010
15,750
2,180
Mobile
✟101,992.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why do so many people fake speaking in tongues?
Why do people need "catchers" when God knocks them off their feet? Isn't He able to put them down gently?
Paul didn't seem to be hurt, even though he was knocked off of a horse.
ouh these are whole "other " questions .. but we cannot prove any one is faking and with every truth there is the counterfeit.but folks simply don't do this .its a huge assumption.
its entwined in that other incorrect assumption that the gift of tongues somehow makes folks better christians ,, that would be definitely not the case ..it is a gift not a merit ,it cannot be earned nor does it validate anything a christian does (or does not do) a man can have the gift of tongues .. and yet do wrongfully ..
we are not to judge the "gift which is from God .. by the actions of the man who received the gift .

i find it surprising that some christians are so swift to do this in the church yet in the world they don't .. ie -the world gifts out the noble peace prize to a man .. later that man goes haywire and does an atrocious act ... they judge the man not the nobel peace prize .(not the best example but you get the drift i hope)
yet in the church a man can have the gift of tongues and then do foolish and even wicked things and you judge the gift along with the gifted .. thats simply a completely erroneous judgment to make .. when we do so we risk judging the Holy Ghost who gave the gift .. be cautious and ask the lord to forgive us .and he will correct us from our error as he always does those he loves :)
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,953
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
When someone says straight out "I faked it", it's a pretty good bet that he faked it.
I've spoken to people myself who were paid to fake an illness or a disability, so that they could be "healed".
I'm convinced that a great deal of the charismatic movement is fake.

What worries me is the bit that isn't. I'm very much afraid that the spirit moving these people to do the things they are doing is not holy.
There is no such thing as being "slain in the spirit" in the Bible. Nor is there any "holy laughter" or anyone stumbling around "drunk in the spirit". Certainly no one crowed like rooster or made noises like any other farm animal "in the spirit".
Yet all of these things are part of the charismatic movement.
I do not trust it.

And the nobel peace prize is something men give to men.
Not the same thing at all.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,953
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
I've been in churches where tongues are spoken. Where I live, you can't avoid it...they are everywhere, and everyone and their sister babbles in tongues...although no one seems to know what they are talking about.
I once watched a pastor's wife, as she spoke in tongues from behind her husband's pulpit. She seemed to grow angrier and angrier...red in the face and screaming...till her husband finally took her arm and led her away.

They have since moved out of the area.
I hope she is happier where ever they went.
 
Upvote 0

Alithis

Disciple of Jesus .
Nov 11, 2010
15,750
2,180
Mobile
✟101,992.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You do know that the Holy Spirit is given to every single person who is baptized?
And you know that there is but one faith, one Lord...and yes, only one baptism?
You know that the only One Who may legitimately claim to have a "special anointing from God" is Jesus, right?

I mean, you are aware of these things, I'm sure.
well this reply was to the question "have you been baptised in the holy Ghost ( and - how do you know )
let me clarify the question .. the lord jesus promised that those who believe in him,he will baptize in the holy ghost and with fire ..

when this occurs .. we know .. and can testify of it - so your answer is basically "no" . i did ask you be honest about it . if you had been you could certainly testify of it .
does that affect your salvation? not at all because you "will be " as you continue to follow the lord jesus into everything he has for you then you are going to be baptised in the Holy Ghost and with fire as he promised . as he told the apostle to go and wait on him.. he asks of us all.. i sought the lord for months hours an hours at night seeking him for it .waiting for him (i now know i didn't have to all i had to do was stop doubting and believe and wait in faith but i waited in struggling and striving ) but he loved me any way and baptised me one day up the back of a church with no one else touching me or praying for me and his glory fell upon me like a weight and like vibrating oil and heat and such power pouring down over my hands and head that i shook to the soles of my feet and later had visions and dreams was delivered from debilitating nightmares and demonic influence and when i pray in tongues to this day i see things and receive interpretation by vision of what im praying in the spirit ..

don't be fooled into listening to tongues from the carnal mind and saying 'it is babble .. go to you tube and play clips of people speaking other languages and listen with your eyes closed .. they all sound like babble ..yet they are all distinct tongues .. we simply cannot judge the spiritual from the carnal mind .. its time to believe and have faith that what the lord jesus has promised .. that is what he does .

it is hard to receive a gift when we say to the giver .. no thanks iv already got it .. what you think yo have you do not have and what you do have is at risk of being taken away . if the lord has promised it then the lord will be faithful to his promise ..we should not ever shun his promises for he promises us these things for our eternal good .why miss out by listening to every negative thing some carnal MEN say ..listen to the lord JESUS .. hear HIM
 
Upvote 0

Alithis

Disciple of Jesus .
Nov 11, 2010
15,750
2,180
Mobile
✟101,992.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
How so?
"these signs will accompany those who have believed: in My name they will cast out demons, they will speak with new tongues;they will pick up serpents, and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover."

Now, it seems to me that it would be rather foolish to claim one or two of these signs, and not all of them. These people want to claim that they have cast out demons, they speak in new tongues, they lay hands on the sick, and they recover...and yes, there are a few who like to handle snakes...after the snakes have been properly refrigerated, of course.
However, I've yet to hear of any of them who drink poison....and again, I am not recommending that anyone try.
As Alice commented..."if you drink too much from a bottle marked "poison" it is almost certain to disagree with you, sooner or later"...
again with the refocusing on the ones i did not testify of.. maybe this will help you.. i live in new zealand there are ZERO snakes in nz so it is rather unlikely i will have come across one by accident to be bitten by it .. ..

but they shall lay hands on the sick and they shall recover - check
they will speak with other tongues - check
they will cast out demons -check

3 not enough for you ?.. if you wont believe 3 you are choosing to not believe -its as simple as that .. time to repent and believe the lord JEsus means what he says and stop listening to every evil report .. you speak of ONE person who says he faked it .. and you are judging millions based on that .. ??
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
PS If you respond, please try to be short. It took me til now to get through this one post. And it hasn't even been that busy at the office. I'm just that slow. :(
I know...I know! One of the things that I have struggled with on this type of forum is that time really only permits us to throw in a line or two which really does nothing for anyone. I've found the new 'spoiler' option to be interesting where maybe I should provide a note that says "anything in this area does not need a reply - it's purely FYI only".

You'll be pleased to know that the rest of this post is an FYI where it is more about the early Pentecostal attitudes toward scholarship and with the cessationist mindset so there is no need to reply to it.

One can always HOPE 'that'. But my experience is that those you are most 'hopeful' for, aren't here to 'seek the truth', they are here 'seeking to win' because they think they already know the truth.
Yes, the now very dated cessationist mindset is certainly something that belongs to a past age. I remember a few years back where I came across a comment by commentator who was talking about a well known theologian who's name I can't recall (maybe William Barclay or Leon Morris?), where the theologian mentioned that he was asked sometime around 1980 why the theologians of the early and mid 20th century failed to speak on the distinctive doctrines of the Pentecostal movement. His reply, "Well, no one asked us!". [If anyone knows who said this then I would appreciate a link.]

This rather remarkable comment shows that our theologians don't always lead where they have the tendency to follow the prevailing views and attitudes of those within their circles. For those of us who had the benefit of spending some time in the Charismatic Renewal of the 60's and 70's (wow...that was before colour TV for a lot of us), then we would be aware of the prevailing attitude amongst Pentecostals that theologians were made in cemeteries (seminaries) and when the 'dead in Christ' are raised that they will be first in line. As the many fine Evangelical theologians prior to the Renewal failed to teach their people about the "things of the Spirit', this left them in the dark and allowed the pre-Charismatic (70's) Pentecostal movement to slide into what could be deemed to be almost an irrelevency.

When it comes to the relic of the old cessationist mindset, we need to keep in mind that there are still many out there who are cessationist not by choice but simply that they have found themselves sitting within theological systems that are isolated from responsible leadership; this can make if very hard for these unfortunates to shake off these old shackles.

With the onset of the Charismatic movement, by the mid-80's we begin to find a lot of commentary by Evangelical scholars who were writing on the "spiritual matters"; these writings eventually moved from being doctoral papers or journal articles that essentially remained within the Christian academy to the open market. Two Evangelical scholars in particular turned things right-side-up in the late 80's; Carson's book "Showing the Spirit" (1987) and Grudem's "Prophecy" (1988) along with the first Pentecostal scholar Gordon Fee with his monumental exegetical work on "First Corinthians" (1987) had a major positive impact on the Church.

Once these papers became available to those outside of the cloistered walls of our universities and colleges, the traditional Pentecostal movement and the fledglng Charismatic movement began to reshape the theological world, which is something that is continuing.

One of the more profound shifts within the academy has been with the amount of amazing material that has been produced not so much by either Pentecostal or charismatic theologians but by those who are deemed to be "open-but-cautious", where these men are neither charismatic or non-charismatic. Once the Evangelical scholars were confronted with the Charismatic Renewal, this allowed (or compelled) them to address the "spiritual things". We now have an almost endless supply of scholars who have provided us with a wealth of research such as with Carson and Thiselton where neither are charismatics (though they might possibly refer to themselves as being 'Renewalists').
 
Upvote 0

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
But again...why do so many people fake speaking in tongues?
Many have admitted it. Why would they do that?
And why do people need "catchers" when they are falling "in the spirit"?
Or, for that matter, blankets?
A number of years back when I was taking a few Bible college subjects, we used to have times of praise on a Monday morning where the all the students would sing and praise God in the Spirit.

After a period of time one of my fellow students mentioned that for some unknown reason that he could not speak in tongues, though he had tried and tried for a long period of time. This was both a source of frustration and embarrasment for him where he felt a bit downhearted in that he could not fully join in during these times of praise.

His solution (where I don't know whether to laugh or cry) was that he would sing in his native Spanish tongue which gave the other students the impression that he was singing in the Spirit. Now I wonder if some student who did not know what was going on has a 'testimony' where they can say "I have heard someone speaking in Spanish while they were singing in the Spirit".

So yes, we have people pretending to speak in tongues, the Church also has people pretending to be Christians or for that matter that they are leading wholesome lives, have a criminal history or where we even elevate ourselves beyond what we should. For that matter, we regularly encounter "teachers" who are paid to teach in our Churches whose teaching abilities and doctrines are nothing more than woeful, does this mean that all teachers are fakes - of course not. Then there are those who hold pastoral offices who seem to lack even the barest semblance of empathy and care.

Edit: Even though some people such as my fellow student were faking an ability to pray in the Spirit, he was not doing so with any intent of malice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Alithis

Disciple of Jesus .
Nov 11, 2010
15,750
2,180
Mobile
✟101,992.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
A number of years back when I was taking a few Bible college subjects, we used to have times of praise on a Monday morning where the all the students would sing and praise God in the Spirit.

After a period of time one of my fellow students mentioned that for some unknown reason that he could not speak in tongues, though he had tried and tried for a long period of time. This was both a source of frustration and embarrasment for him where he felt a bit downhearted in that he could not fully join in during these times of praise.

His solution (where I don't know whether to laugh or cry) was that he would sing in his native Spanish tongue which gave the other students the impression that he was singing in the Spirit. Now I wonder if some student who did not know what was going on has a 'testimony' where they can say "I have heard someone speaking in Spanish while they were singing in the Spirit".

So yes, we have people pretending to speak in tongues, the Church also has people pretending to be Christians or for that matter that they are leading wholesome lives, have a criminal history or where we even elevate ourselves beyond what we should. For that matter, we regularly encounter "teachers" who are paid to teach in our Churches whose teaching abilities and doctrines are nothing more than woeful, does this mean that all teachers are fakes - of course not. Then there are those who hold pastoral offices who seem to lack even the barest semblance of empathy and care.
yikes .. the great sorrow is that he thought he was somehow lacking that is very sad .. singing in the spirit can be done perfectly in english also .. it need not be limited to tongues ..
 
Upvote 0

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
I've been in churches where tongues are spoken. Where I live, you can't avoid it...they are everywhere,
It sounds like you live in a pretty good area.

I once watched a pastor's wife, as she spoke in tongues from behind her husband's pulpit. She seemed to grow angrier and angrier...red in the face and screaming...till her husband finally took her arm and led her away.
Your comment allows me to say that over the years that I have encountered both many an austere cold cessationist member or congregation who has attacked any of their members who express an elevated joy in the Lord or when they have even received healing from the Lord in response to prayer.

Does this mean that all cessationsists (particulary of the Calvinist kind) that they are all cold-hearted and lack any semblance of love - of course not!
 
Upvote 0

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
yikes .. the great sorrow is that he thought he was somehow lacking that is very sad .. singing in the spirit can be done perfectly in english also .. it need not be limited to tongues ..
As the college was populated primarily by a lot of rather youthful and less experienced students, the atmosphere where you have so many enthused individuals can probably lead us to do things that we probably shouldn't.

But you're right in that it was sad in that he felt that he had to go down this pathway and even more sad that he for some strange reason was unable to release himself to pray in the Spirit.

As for 'praying in the Spirit', this is Paul's way of referring to tongues.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
How so?
"these signs will accompany those who have believed: in My name they will cast out demons, they will speak with new tongues;they will pick up serpents, and if they drink any deadly poison, it will not hurt them; they will lay hands on the sick, and they will recover."

When Jesus said “these things will follow” he was not expecting us to believe that he was suggesting that every single Believer will be able to be bitten by snakes and live (as with Paul’s occurrence) or that everyone will choose to pray in the Spirit (tongues).

All he is saying is that these things shall accompany his Believing Church.

As you accept Mark 16:17-18 as being a part of the original writings of Mark, then you appear to be saying that as you are unwilling/unable to pray in the Spirit that you are not Born Again, which of course is incorrect doctrine in the first place.

What do you make of Acts 2:17-21 where Peter says that in the Last Days (New Covenant) that God will;
  • Pour forth of my Spirit on all mankind (both men and women)
  • Your sons and daughters shall prophesy
  • Your young men shall see visions
  • Your old men shall dream dreams
If you wish to be consistent with your logic then you will have to say that besides the serpents and being able to pray in the Spirit that if you (we) have not prophesied, had visions or dreamed dreams that we cannot call ourselves a Child of God.

As Alice commented..."if you drink too much from a bottle marked "poison" it is almost certain to disagree with you, sooner or later"...
Even though I am about to present a hypothetical situation, if Paul in Acts 28:3-5 had of picked up the viper that bit him saying “hey, look at me” then I wonder what the outcome of such a foolish action would be? I seriously doubt if Jesus (Mark 16) had in mind where some clowns could setup their own religious sideshow but more with how God can/may protect those who are in his service.
 
Upvote 0

TheBarrd

Teller of tales, writer of poems, singer of songs
Mar 1, 2015
4,953
1,746
Following a Jewish Carpenter
✟14,094.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
When Jesus said “these things will follow” he was not expecting us to believe that he was suggesting that every single Believer will be able to be bitten by snakes and live (as with Paul’s occurrence) or that everyone will choose to pray in the Spirit (tongues).
All he is saying is that these things shall accompany his Believing Church.

And if someone shows none of these signs, is he/she still a Christian?

As you accept Mark 16:17-18 as being a part of the original writings of Mark, then you appear to be saying that as you are unwilling/unable to pray in the Spirit that you are not Born Again, which of course is incorrect doctrine in the first place.

My understanding is that the Holy Spirit gives these gifts as He wills...not as the recipient wishes.

What do you make of Acts 2:17-21 where Peter says that in the Last Days (New Covenant) that God will;
  • Pour forth of my Spirit on all mankind (both men and women)
  • Your sons and daughters shall prophesy
  • Your young men shall see visions
  • Your old men shall dream dreams
If you wish to be consistent with your logic then you will have to say that besides the serpents and being able to pray in the Spirit that if you (we) have not prophesied, had visions or dreamed dreams that we cannot call ourselves a Child of God.

And if someone has had a vision or dreamed a dream, but hasn't shown any of the other signs, what would you make of that?

Even though I am about to present a hypothetical situation, if Paul in Acts 28:3-5 had of picked up the viper that bit him saying “hey, look at me” then I wonder what the outcome of such a foolish action would be? I seriously doubt if Jesus (Mark 16) had in mind where some clowns could setup their own religious sideshow but more with how God can/may protect those who are in his service.

Exactly so. That is what I believe also.
And, to take it a step further...I do not believe that God gave the gift of tongues so that silly women could put on a show of their "holiness" by babbling gibberish in church, either.
He gave it to the early church to be used to spread the gospel to people who might not speak in the same language that they did.


And gifts of "Holy laughter"? Or "drunk in the spirit"? The Holy Spirit did not give anyone these gifts. If, as some insist, they are "real", then they must come from some other source.
And that worries me.

:tutu:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
This became a very long post but there was no other option as you had asked a number of questions which required reasonably indepth replies.

And if someone shows none of these signs, is he/she still a Christian?
Before the Lord, anyone, be they a Pentecostal, charismatic or cessationist, if we have repented of our sin and confessed Jesus as Lord, where we subsequently receive the Holy Spirit then we each have equal standing before the Lord.

To reiterate, these “things” are;

1. Things that were prophesied of:

Mark 16:17-18
  • Cast out demons
  • Speak in tongues
  • Pick up serpents and not die
  • Lay hands on the sick where they will recover (There is also a specific Office of healings which suggests that most of us will not be greatly used in this area. Also see James 5:14)

Acts 2:17-21

Note: All Believers (both charismatic and non-charismatic) have had the Spirit poured out upon them and many charismatics and non-charismatics have had dreams. Though I doubt if all that many non-charismatics have prophesied or been open to having visions, but this does not say that it is impossible.
  • Pour forth of my Spirit on all mankind (both men and women)
  • Your sons and daughters shall prophesy
  • Your young men shall see visions
  • Your old men shall dream dreams

1. Things that were established for the Church up until the return of the Lord

1 Cor 12:7-11 (9 Manifestations of the Spirit)

Note: Both charismatics and non-charismatics can allow the Spirit to work through them within wisdom, knowledge and faith; these three operations of the Spirit are not the sole domain of the Pentecostal/charismatic. Many non-charismatics have obviously seen positive results when they’ve prayed for those who are sick, though they would be most likely discouraged from seeking or being recognised as holding a healing ministry by their peers.
  • Wisdom
  • Knowledge
  • Faith
  • Healings
  • Powers (aka, miracles)
  • Prophecy
  • Discernment of spirits
  • Tongues
  • Interpretation

1 Cor 12:28 (8 Congregational Offices that were established by the Father)

Note: We ALL fit into at least one of these Offices, irrespective if we are charismatic nor non-charismatic or if the denomination/congregation that we are a part of recognise these Offices or not. Most denominations would recognise the Office of the teacher and they would be more than accommodative with those who are within the Office of helps (i.e., pastoral ministry etc.) and administrations (i.e., areas of leadership and direction).
  • Apostle (i.e., contemporary church planters)
  • Prophet
  • Teacher
  • Powers
  • Healings
  • Administrations
  • Helps
  • Tongues (incl. interpretation)

It is often said that the Father “gives” these 8 Offices to various individuals within each local congregation. This is also a common misconception amongst Pentecostals and charismatics as well. What we are told in (NASB) 1Cor 12:24 “But God has so composed the body… and in verse 28 we are told “And God has appointed (not given) in the church…”

So Paul is not saying that “God gives these things” but that he has chosen to organise the ministry aspect (not leadership) of each local congregation in a specific way. The four Offices that I have marked in bold are in my view not activities/Offices that are operated/initiated/manifested by the Holy Spirit as they reflect more our temperament, character and personality. Even though it’s rare to see where any scholarly material makes this division as markedly as I have; even so, many will still make comment that these four roles in particular that they ‘seem’ to have a natural component within them.

These 8 Offices are also a distinct/separate set of operations to those of the 9 Manifestations of the Spirit (1Cor 12:7-11) where five have a direct relationship to the 8 Offices;

1. tongues + interpretation - Tongues
2. prophecy - Prophet
3. healings - Healing
4. powers - Powers​



My understanding is that the Holy Spirit gives these gifts as He wills...not as the recipient wishes.
1Co 12:11 But one and the same Spirit works all these things, distributing to each one individually just as He wills.​
You’re absolutely right. Just to be sure I’ll restate what verse 11 is referring to, where my position is that there are only nine Manifestations of the Spirit (aka, spiritual gifts) and no more. As a qualification, the Offices of the apostle, teacher, administration and helps (12:28) are not operations of the Spirit (though we hope each person is guided by the Spirit) so they fall outside of the list of 9 MotS.
  1. Wisdom
  2. Knowledge
  3. Faith
  4. Healings
  5. Powers (aka, miracles)
  6. Prophecy
  7. Discernment of spirits
  8. Tongues
  9. Interpretation
Now the prudent Pentecostal or charismatic will quickly acknowledge that the individual will not outwork the full range of 9 Spiritual manifestations. But this leaves us with the prickly question as to why do those within the Pentecostal and charismatic movements (PCM) make the claim that all Believers are able to speak in tongues and that when a person is Born Again, where we receive the Holy Spirit, that they should (or at least ideally) speak in tongues at this point of time?
We should appreciate that tongues (or praying in the Spirit) is by its very nature prayer; where this prayer is always directed by the Spirit to the Father; so this prayer language can also become one of praise. With reference to Acts 2 we see Peter making reference to the “Last Days” which commenced on the Day of Pentecost.
You will of course come across the populist PCM opinion that tongues + interpretation = prophecy which can be dismissed outright as this never occurs. The formula has been rejected outright by PCM and Evangelical scholars alike such as with the AoG scholar Gordon Fee (First Corinthians, pg 598) and the Anglican scholar Thiselton along with many others.
Of all the 9 Spiritual manifestations, our ability to pray/praise in the Spirit (tongues) sets it apart from the other outworkings of the Spirit. Even though no one would decry having more wisdom, knowledge and faith these three activities of the Spirit are essentially intended to serve others. The same goes for healings and prophecy but tongues stands out as being the only ability that the Spirit gives us to worship God in Spirit. The Scriptures also tell us that the Spirit intercedes for us in tongues in Rom 8:26 and Paul goes on to encourage us in Eph 6:18 to “pray at all times in the Spirit”. In Jude 20 we are to build ourselves up on our most holy faith by praying in the Spirit; this of course has a direct connection with 1Cor 14:4 where Paul tells us that praying in tongues edifies the one who prays.
The classic-Pentecostal position that the Baptism in the Holy Spirit is subsequent to our initial salvation, where we are supposedly first ‘sealed’ with the Holy Spirit before we are subsequently Baptised in the Holy Spirit, is based on what is called “Lukan theology”. In Acts (Luke) we see the outpouring of the Holy Spirit being evidenced by the 120 speaking words of praise (tongues) to the Father. Peter also justified sharing the Gospel with the Romans where they were subsequently Baptised in the Holy Spirit by their speaking in tongues. Luke in Acts 19:6 records that the 12 Ephesian disciples received the Holy Spirit by their evidence of speaking in tongues. In Acts 8:18 Simon saw something powerful occur when people were filled with the Holy Spirit and even though we are not told what he witnessed, we can easily presume that he saw these new Saints both praising God in tongues and probably prophesying.
Unlike Luke whose historical record of Acts seems to equate tongues with the reception of the Spirit at conversion (thus, Lukan theology), Paul does not do this where he equates the BHS with our initial salvation.
To summarise, as we are told to regularly pray in the Spirit (tongues) throughout the Scriptures, why should this be limited to only some and not the others?
And if someone has had a vision or dreamed a dream, but hasn't shown any of the other signs, what would you make of that?
I’m not sure what you mean here but even a Born Again cessationist can receive dreams from the Father.

Exactly so. That is what I believe also.
And, to take it a step further...I do not believe that God gave the gift of tongues so that silly women could put on a show of their "holiness" by babbling gibberish in church, either.
Even though people can both misuse and even abuse their ability to either pray or praise God in the Spirit, this does not discount their ability but merely that they may be lacking an appropriate amount of common sense. The same goes for those who hold the Office of the Teacher, it would be rare for even a responsible teacher to get everything right and of course this does not mean that they are fakes.

He gave it to the early church to be used to spread the gospel to people who might not speak in the same language that they did.
As I’ve mentioned on a few occasions on this thread, we have no evidence where tongues has ever been used to share the Gospel to anyone. People often point to the Day of Pentecost but all the 120 (or at least most of them) were doing was to “speak of the mighty deeds of God” (Acts 2:11). There words contained no evangelistic message where even Peter had to “save the day” by providing an Evangelistic message in tongues.
If tongues could have been used this way, then I suspect that this incredible ability would have been enough to grab the attention of the entire Empire where it would have quickly seen all repenting.
And gifts of "Holy laughter"? Or "drunk in the spirit"? The Holy Spirit did not give anyone these gifts. If, as some insist, they are "real", then they must come from some other source.
And that worries me.
I suppose that some could refer to this unusual emotional occurrence as being a “spiritual-gift” but this would be rare. In my opinion these emotional outbursts are simply that, human emotions getting a bit beyond the norm. Of course I have seen people behaving foolishly and there are reason for this but it is beyond this post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
My goodness, how we Christians do love to complicate what Jesus Christ died to make simple...
Well, a lot of us simply enjoy undoing the pretentions of man - and there are a few around (that's pretentions, not men)!
 
Upvote 0