http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...ision-polygamy-119469_Page2.html#.VY4vQ_mqqkp
I credit this author for admitting to the very real slippery slope consequence now created because of the SCOTUS decision yesterday. It's incumbent upon the person who supports ssm but not polygamy to show how he's not being a hypocrite when supposedly marriage is "all about love" and nothing else. Why do I say "all about love"? I say this because for years, one very popular mantra of ssm supporters was "don't tell me who I can love"--as if anyone were! Since SCOTUS decision, an equally popular mantra is "love wins". Therefore, love, and only love, appears to be the only criteria for ssm supporters and ought to be for supporters of polygamy.
I credit this author for admitting to the very real slippery slope consequence now created because of the SCOTUS decision yesterday. It's incumbent upon the person who supports ssm but not polygamy to show how he's not being a hypocrite when supposedly marriage is "all about love" and nothing else. Why do I say "all about love"? I say this because for years, one very popular mantra of ssm supporters was "don't tell me who I can love"--as if anyone were! Since SCOTUS decision, an equally popular mantra is "love wins". Therefore, love, and only love, appears to be the only criteria for ssm supporters and ought to be for supporters of polygamy.
Last edited: