President Trump's message on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception
- By JimR-OCDS
- One Bread, One Body - Catholic
- 7 Replies
JD Vance and Marco Rubio are Catholic.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is he here illegally? Can he be deported?Hernandez is believed to be in the United States after Trump pardoned him.
*Takes a sip of magic tea* May God bless you even if it may seem as though satan has gotten an advantage or is worth believing. For God will send someone to help you whether it be the Holy Spirit, or angels, or a person to remind you that you're being helped by these beings.
Why was Mary conceived without sin?
This question lies at the heart of one of the most misunderstood yet most beautiful doctrines of the Catholic Faith.
In this long-form catechetical video, Excerpta Catechismi explores the Feast of the Immaculate Conception through the traditional teaching of the Church, drawing especially from The Church’s Year by Rev. Leonard Goffine, Sacred Scripture, and the writings of the Church Fathers and saints
You will learn why Mary was preserved from the stain of original sin from the first moment of her existence — how this privilege flows entirely from the merits of Jesus Christ — and why the Immaculate Conception marks the first light of redemption before the birth of Christ. Far from diminishing Christ’s role, this doctrine magnifies His saving power and reveals what grace can accomplish when sin has no foothold.
This video also explains the biblical foundations of the Immaculate Conception, including the angel’s greeting “full of grace,” the prophecy of the Woman in Genesis, and Mary as the true Ark of the Covenant. It reflects on Mary as the New Eve, her role in God’s plan of salvation, and the powerful moral lessons this feast offers to every Christian.
As Advent approaches, the Immaculate Conception reminds us that Mary is the pure dawn before the rising of the Sun of Justice. By contemplating her purity, humility, and obedience, we are invited to prepare our own souls for the coming of Christ through repentance, devotion, and conversion of life.
pseudoclasm.wordpress.com
Lol I mean Columbus. Columbus, Ohio the capital and largest city in Ohio. I know Ohio from the CSNY song by the same name. Great song.The US has no state called Columbia.
I think I understand it enough to know that it has caused some States a lot of trouble in trying to harbor and hide illegals. Something like 20 million in the last few years and some States have been overwhelmed. No checks, vetting and integration.I don't think you have any idea what "sanctuary" means in this context.
Never said you did. What you do miss is that sin is not a people only situation. There are other operators involved that are not people.Again, you throw up a strawman argument about claiming I am suggesting, some people are sinless, which I never even suggested.
The "Victory" was not counting sins against people.A lot is made of the fact Paul switched to the present tense in these verses, but was there a reason that the Roman reader to pick up on this switch and better understand what Paul was saying? We are reading other peoples mail to Romans in Rome during the first century, so what would be the best way to communicate a huge victory over sin to them?
Beside the point, whatever point you're trying to makeWhen Mark describes in his Gospel is Christ’s great battle with a climatic victory being Christ rising, he wrote it in the “historic present tense”. Supporting the idea Mark was in Rome at the time.
Yet Paul's flesh still served the "law of sin," vs. 25, so maybe not get the victory cart in front of the horse?What Paul is describing in Romans 7: 14-24 is a great battle and final climatic victory over sin in the “historic present tense”.
Why differentiate? Our sin is no different than that of any person. Paul claimed to be "chief of same" present tense, 1 Tim. 1:9Sin has purpose for the nonbeliever, but what “purpose” does it have in the believer life?
I'd suggest that there was one huge colossal difference involved, being only ONE was without sin. No one else has that claim. It is held only by God in Christ.When Deity dwelled unquenched in a human (Christ) it did not sin, so does deity dwell within Christians, so the problem is really the quenching of the Spirit?
I'd suggest your figures don't figure. We all deal with adversaries unseen. So if your quest is to make some other claim, be clear about it. The devil still exists and sin still exists and death still exists. So your "victory claim" is not yet completed and won't be until the end of the devil and his messengers.On every major street corner in Rome were monuments to some great Roman victory, some parts of these monuments are in museums today and below each is given an exciting climatic description of the battle in the “historic present tense”. This was the same description carried by messengers sent out by the general over the Roman Empire, after a great victory.
Mimicking Roman generals? Unlikely. Nice imagination stab, but a rather hollow analogy considering that mankind had been at war for thousands of years before "Roman generals" besides the ongoing unseen war with our adverse spiritual adversaries that are impetus behind all war and killing.Similar to this Roman section on (the war and victory over sin) is Mark’s whole Gospel of Christ’s war against satan’s follows of this world”.
As far as Ro. 7: 14-24
The Gospel of Mark was mimicking the messages that were sent out by the Roman generals after winning a great battle. These messages went with messengers to dramatically present the battle with the victory at the end, to the cheers of the crowd. They were always in the present tense and we have some copies that were written in stone under the battle monuments that were spread throughout Rome. The Gospel of Mark is written in the style of these Victory Messages sent by the Roman General to the Roman Empire and Mark’s is very much a victory message. Do you think, Paul in keep with the Roman culture of the day, would have written His victorious battle over sin in the present tense to the Romans in Rome?
IF your claim is that Paul was sinless because of Christ, you'd be quite entirely off the page.It is called the “historic present tense”, by scholars and would fit what Paul was saying to the Romans.
This topic and the use of Romans 7: 14-24 come up a lot and a lot has been written on it.
The context helps and you need to address these questions:
That the law promoted sin, which Paul termed "no longer I" to input illegal thoughts into his mind, and thereby he determined that evil was present withIN him.1. When did Paul learn about “coveting”?
We are all born as blinded sinners, timing in or out of the womb notwithstanding. I'd suggest at the moment of our creation, Psalm 51:52. When did this problem start for Paul?
Paul spent his entire life in grief, Romans 9:23. Does Paul continue in the misery and what would relief this misery?
There is only one solution and that hasn't transpired yet.4. Is “just being forgiven” a good solution to the problem?
You're trying to isolate Paul from having to deal internally with the tempter. I'd suggest you're barking up the wrong tree with that angle because it was never a question of just Paul or just people to start with.5. When did Paul obtain the solution?
Christ condemned sin in sinful flesh. That hasn't changed. YET sins are not counted against people, 2 Cor. 5:19 which again brings us back to the basic point.The answer to the problem of sinning while here on earth is solved with Romans chapter 8 and the indwelling holy Spirit.
Look, you really are beating around the bush on this subject. We ALL have evil thoughts that defile us. Now even in your theology world you're not avoiding that fact. The only part you're missing is the other party that is behind it all.We are all being temped by sin, but True Christians have the indwelling Holy Spirit to overcome those temptations. Ro. 3:9
Paul was exceptionally clear it was a messenger of Satan aka as a DEVIL, not "thee" devil, but "they" are all from the same seed, the same family, the same kingdom. The devil has children too aka seeds, tares, thorns, goats, etc.2 Cor. 12:7 talks about the help he receives from satan’s thorn in the flesh Paul was given, but that is not satan himself living in Paul.
Nice spin on turning "temptation" into ILLNESS. I guess you could spin it that way but the messenger of Satan is not an illness. Might cause illness, but no. Temptations defile all of us and Paul's temptations were spelled out quite clearly in Romans 7:7-13, lustful thoughts.Gal. 4: 14 “and even though my illness was a trial to you, you did not treat me with contempt or scorn. Instead, you welcomed me as if I were an angel of God, as if I were Christ Jesus himself.”
boy, you just really don't care to drag the devils into these pictures do you?We all get sick sometimes while on earth, but that can help us.
You're fixated on a people only positions. No use in scripture understandings at all because you're missing a very critical piece. You know, the one you can't even bring into the pictures.1 Cor. 10: 13 No temptation has overtaken you except what is common to mankind. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can endure it.
We can use our failures of the past as part of our witness, since we are no longer the same person.
Brilliant conclusion except for the fact that we all have evil thoughts that defile us and that sin is of the devil.All mature adults have sinned in the past, but the indwelling Spirit does not sin, but we can quench the Spirit and sin.
The point again being is that one of the parties in the "lump of me" is as Paul said, "NO LONGER I."The main question (a diatribe question) in Romans 9 Paul addresses is God being fair or just Rms. 9: 14 What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all!
Your diatribes just miss the obvious and revolve only around people. It's actually quite funny that you can't bring the devil, our very real ADVERSARY into any of these pictures.This will take some explaining, since just prior in Romans 9, Paul went over some history of God’s dealings with the Israelites that sounds very “unjust” like “loving Jacob and hating Esau” before they were born, but remember in all of Paul’s diatribes he begins before, just after or before and just after with strong support for the wrong answer (this makes it more of a debate and giving the opposition the first shot as done in all diatribes).
Again you miss a very basic point "because" you can't bring the other party into the picture. The "eldest" is a representative of a blinded slave of Satan, ala Acts 26:18, 2 Cor. 3:14, 2 Cor. 4:4, Eph. 2:2Who in Rome would be having a “problem” with God choosing to work with Isaac and Jacob instead of Ishmael and Esau? Would the Jewish Christian have a problem with this or would it be the Gentile Christians?
Has nothing to do with only people. I think we've isolated your one sided sight long enough quite frankly.If God treaded you as privileged and special would you have a problem or would you have a problem if you were treated seemingly as common and others were treated with honor for no apparent reason?
I don't wish for this to sound flippant so apologies if it has come across that way.Because it's not only the Bible that uses historic vernacular.
Take for instance the Romans and how they phrased quotations on engravings underneath their monuments or busts, and then think about if we had teachers rephrase these quotations so that we understood them in modern context. Why wouldn't we apply this to other writings?
Now, if we argue that we can't expect secular teachers to teach us the changes within our Bible, fine. But, surely, this is where the church comes in?
For example, our church uses the NIV. Seemingly, even some of the words and phrases which I consider to be 'everyday' and basic, are beyond the scope of what some have been taught or come across often, so our pastor provides alternate words or summarizes phrases in a more 'modern' way for generalized understanding.
The responsibility for learning has to lie somewhere. We can't all just delegate responsibility to someone else or just cease the pursuit of knowledge. There are many paths to learning if someone is willing to pursue them.
I don't have advice other than to have friendly comments when you talk to people. Don't crticize or condemn. Don't complain about your upbringing. I wasn't allowed friends growing up and we moved every year.I was wondering if any other Christians are having trouble with making friends. Friendships you're actually happy with and are good for you. It can be with other Christians or non-believers.
I feel like I have trouble. I don't really know where to find other Christians that are like me.
At work I'm around people I do not trust. They lie, they gossip, they're out to get others, etc. So I have to watch what I say and do, and protect myself.
I also haven't been to church in 6 years. I know that's bad. But I'm not impressed with the churches in my area.
I agree.What I am definitely sure of, is that they are 2 literal persons, and not a metaphor for the Church and Israel