• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

James Woods emotional response to Trump on Rob Reiner's death

James Woods has slammed Donald Trump over his 'distasteful' comments about Rob Reiner despite being one of Hollywood's most outspoken supporters of the President.

The 78-year-old praised Reiner - a staunch liberal - for saving his career and being a 'Godsend in my life' during his Monday night appearance on Fox News's Jesse Watters Primetime.

The actor also hit out at Reiner's critics, claiming that although their politics did not align, the murdered filmmaker does not deserve to be spoken poorly of.

'I judge people by how they treat me, and Rob Reiner was a Godsend in my life. We got along great, we loved each other… He was always on my side,' Woods said.

'When people would say to me, "What do you think of his politics?" I would say, "I think Rob Reiner is a great patriot." Do I agree on many of his ideas on how that patriotism should be enacted, to celebrate the America that we both love? No.

'He doesn't agree with me either, but he also respects my patriotism. We had a different path to the same destination, which was a country we both love.'

Woods further argued that saying 'horrible things' about Reiner is 'infuriating and distasteful,' adding: 'Because you disagree with people doesn't mean that you have to hate people.'

Continued below.
well ... I would agree with Woods ... however it is also true that Reiner said some very vile things as well ... the reality is people are going to say and/or do hateful things .... the depravity of mankind.

Sin taints every aspect of a person—mind, heart, will, body, emotions—leaving no part uncorrupted by its effects.

I try to dismiss the hateful things someone might say and try to see what the substance they are talking about is without it (the main point). Tuff to do sometimes and sometimes there is no substance.
Upvote 0

Why we are not supposed to keep the Sabbath

Nope. Since all Christians freely admit "Do not take God's name in vain" was valid going all the way back to Genesis 2.

Sabbath "MADE for mankind and not mankind MADE for the Sabbath" Mark 2:27 speaks of the making of BOTH in Gen 1-2. Obviously.

You have been working very hard to sidestep the obvious.
Already addressed Mark 2:37-28 and you ignored it so not wasting my time again. Seems that you only quoted small portions of my posts that you think you can attack but it doesn’t work.

There is nothing in Gen. 1-2 that help your case. And even if you try you still have to remember that no one knew or read Genesis or even the full Torah until the 15th century BCE. And even then, you still have no verse that shows anyone keeping the sabbath before Moses. In the last post I showed you how the Jews collecting Manna for the sabbath had no idea what they were doing until Moses told them (Exodus 16). That alone proves that no one before Moses kept the sabbath. It’s really that simple.
And it is sad since almost all of your sunday keeping groups agree in their confessions of faith that this is the case with the TEN.
Never had a problem with the 10 or argued against them so this is a Strawman. I’ve explained many times before that 9 of the 10 were repeated into Jesus 2 love commandments and Jesus is the Lord of the sabbath so the 4th commandment is now the rest in Christ and no longer in a day. Christ is God and perfectly capable to give us a new covenant with whatever terms He wishes.
But you have free will and can choose to ignore all the scripture that you wish, of course.
And you have the “free” will to reject legalism and the law and enjoy the freedom in Christ. Let go of the yoke of the law.

“It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery. Look! I, Paul, tell you that if you have yourselves circumcised, Christ will be of no benefit to you. And I testify again to every man who has himself circumcised, that he is obligated to keep the whole Law.”
‭‭Galatians‬ ‭5‬:‭1‬-‭3‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
Text please. speaking about what Abraham knew after his death.
I actually misposted here. I meant to say that Abraham before his death did not know that Moses would be the one to record the Mosaic law. My apologies. I fixed it on the quoted post also.
"Gathered to my fathers" statements is not about "meeting and partying". It is about going to the same place
So what do you think that entails? Use evidence not gut feeling.
the book of Genesis is not a transcript of every word spoken for the first 2000 years of human history, as almost all of us know
Even so you can’t just make it up just because you want to. You are making an argument from silence.
Upvote 0

Why do people hate ICE...

A

Actually I didn't. But you can think so if you wish.

You said:
Muslims have placed themselves there. They have placed themselves in the exclusionary camp because they fail to assimilate. Why? Because of their religion, which rejects western ideology, culture and values. They seek to alter the western way and change it to the Islamist way. They come from third world countries with their uneducated backgrounds and their third world values and culture that is guided by their religious belief systems, they cant speak the language and separate themselves from the western civilization and demand we change OUR ways and you want to blame the west? How nonsensical is that?

The Know-Nothing: And American Crusader, 1854:
We must not let this fact go-by—the Roman Catholics are bound to serve their Church before their Country.

What is the practical and inevitable result of such a system in this country? Why, that every Catholic stands committed as an enemy to the Republic. In such a character, base as it is—reeking all over, soaked all through with a religion that countenance crime; with principals that are shocked at no extremity of corruption— their whole effect is to pull down Republicanism and bolster up Romanism. This it does. It is seen. The thing is plain. It can't be otherwise. A man who is a Roman Catholic is not a Republican. He can't be. Calling fish, flesh, don't make it so. Hence whatever is told you of Catholicism as favorable to all that is American, put no faith in it. The Pope of Rome says America must be crushed—and all political economists of any note or weight, agree that if it is ever crushed, it will be by Romanism.

Let us remember these matters. Let us regard every Roman Catholic as an enemy to the country—and so treat him. He is nothing else.

Have fun.
Upvote 0

The Thing Most Sabbath Keepers Do not Talk About.

Antinomianism, definition and a Question "is this you"?

Definition for "Antinomianism" AI: Antinomianism is a term used in Christian theology to describe the belief that, because salvation is granted by divine grace through faith, believers are not bound by the moral law of God, including the Ten Commandments (which were given to only one nation on Earth, Israel.)
www.christianforums.com
www.christianforums.com



I wish to inform you that I do not fit the description of one of those because I am truly bound by Jesus' command to LOVE OTHERS AS HE LOVES US. That is exactly what the laws of morality mankind is under. If we love Him who was sent to save man, we will abide by His commands, not the defunct Torah that ended with the coming of the New and better covenant of Grace and Love.

My allegiance is to Jesus, not Moses and the old covenant. Amen!
You of course inserted your own "Bob S" definition for Antinomianism possibly because the actual definition does not fit your own preference.

I choose Christ instead of that method

Christ said
1. Mark 2:27 "The Sabbath was made for mankind , not mankind made for the Sabbath" , which speaks of the making of BOTH mankind AND the Sabbath in Gen 1-2.

2. Is 66:23 all mankind observes Sabbath in New Earth
3. Gen 2:2-3 is the origin of the Sabbath commandment according to Christ in Ex 20:11 (Hint Heb 8 says Christ is speaking at Sinai)
4. Luke 16 Christ said that people that reject Moses will not listen even if someone rises from the Dead (hint: Christ)
5. Christ condemns the teaching that tries to do away with the Law of God

No wonder antinomianism gets such a bad wrap. The Bible rejects it


yeah "the real" antinomianism so fully refuted in Christianity
Upvote 0

What Did You Get Last Sunday?

Probably. Christmas has been so thoroughly marketed as a family day and taken over by football and basketball that a lot of churches, even liturgical churches, cancel anyway. I haven't presided a Christmas Day service since I left Virginia; no one wants it. The last time Christmas fell on a Sunday there was some snow out but not a lot. I had a terrible time finding somewhere to take my kids. The Romans had pared down there usual 3 Mass schedule to only 1. I ended taking them to a Lessons & Carols service at the local Methodist Church.
That is really sad, although well done for finding the Lessons and Carols. Midnight Mass that actually runs anywhere near midnight is getting harder to find in the UK, and it does not work for me to be done by 11:00pm.
  • Friendly
Reactions: The Liturgist

Denaturalization

I bat it doesn’t make sense to you that that a virgin could give birth to a child who later called himself the Son of God, died on the cross, and was resurrected three days afterward.

How can I explain you that prophet Ezekiel predicted around 590 BC that the Jewish people would be gathered from all corners of the earth to form a nation. This prophecy, delivered by God to Ezekiel nearly 2,500 years before Israel became a modern state in 1948.

As an atheist who does not believe in God or the authenticity of Biblical writings, I recognize that our perspectives on this matter differ considerably. Given these fundamental differences, I do not see value in debating this issue further. I respect your right to hold your beliefs, and I will continue to adhere to my convictions.
It's a matter of definition. The use of the phrase "born again" to describe the conversion experience is pretty much limited to Evangelical Protestantism. Catholics and other Traditional Christians have a conversion experience, just different way of describing it. A more important difference is whether or not the present state of Israel represents a fulfillment of God's promise to the Jews. That is definitely an Evangelical Protestant position that not even all Jews agree with.
Upvote 0

Jackie Shroyer, wife of US missionary, sentenced to 24 years in prison for his murder

Jackie Shroyer, the 44-year-old wife of late Minnesota missionary Beau Shroyer, who is alleged to have been the mastermind behind a murder-for-hire plot that led to his death in Lubango, Angola, in October 2024, has been convicted and sentenced to 24 years in prison.

Troy M. Easton, lead pastor of the Lakes Area Vineyard Church in Detroit Lakes, Minnesota, where Shroyer and her late husband were members before moving to Lubango to do missionary work under the auspices of longtime global missionary organization SIM USA, confirmed the conviction in a statement to his congregation on Nov. 5.

“It saddens me deeply to share the following update regarding the legal proceedings involving Jackie Shroyer. This morning, I was notified that Jackie was convicted by an Angolan court of involvement in the murder of her husband, Beau Shroyer, on October 25, 2024. Jackie is expected to serve her sentence in an Angolan detention facility,” Easton said.

Continued below.

Trump signs executive order classifying fentanyl as a ‘weapon of mass destruction’

That is pretty weird. He's doing this with the threat of a ground war in Venezuela and blowing up "drug boats" in the Caribbean, but fentanyl doesn't come from Venezuela or the Caribbean...
It's not like the WMDs have to be in the country, or exist, for the US to invade because of them.
I'm not sure what this means or how it can be... enforced?

It wont be, executive orders are not laws.
Upvote 0

What Jesus Said About Adam and Eve

I’m not sure I get what your point is or the reason for your outrage at Mark.
I'm just saying it's disrespectful to regard God as a mere "designer." "Outrage" seems to be someone else's reaction to the observation. As I pointed out before, it's not something that will send one to hell; it's just selling God short.

Also you seem to be … upset, curiously, about the idea of humans being holy aside from the soul.
Since no one mentioned that here, I'm puzzled why you would think so. I suppose if you thought that God using nature to make our bodies, as opposed to directly giving us a living soul, means bodies can't be holy, then maybe. But no one said that, either.
Edit: there was the issue of an odd belief that assumed the natural is imperfect and the supernatural is not. But I don't think that this is what you're saying here.
but Genesis 1 is important as a prophetic text, for in Holy Week God remade us as he made us in Genesis 1, on Great and Holy Friday, before resting on the Sabbath and rising from the dead on Sunday, the first day, also typologically symbolizing the mystical eighth day of creation, that of the Life of the World to Come.
That's one of the things it is.
1 Corinthians 15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.

But it's also a clear distinction between God and the gods of other nations, making clear that the God of Abraham is the omnipotent Creator with no other gods at all. He did not have to bring the universe into His control; He created it to do His will.
Roman Catholics had historically celebrated the Dormition, which is also called the Assumption, but some erroneously believe she did not repose but was assumed while still alive,
The Western Church teaches that after her life, Mary was assumed, body and soul into heaven. The Eastern Church seems to put more emphasis on this moment, but other than noting that the Dormition of the Theotokos is often depicted in Orthodox churches, I don't know much about any differences in theology.

None of this is actually an issue for salvation, as God makes it clear what will save us.
Upvote 0

Is Hell Annihilationism or Eternal Torment

The problem with Thee Shepherd is, that He can't teach you anything and you can't even speak to Him. Unless you of 'course you believe you can ascend to heaven to hang out with Him.
The problem you refer to does not exist.

" You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it." John 14:14

"14 For this reason I kneel before the Father, 15 from whom every family[a] in heaven and on earth derives its name. 16 I pray that out of his glorious riches he may strengthen you with power through his Spirit in your inner being, 17 so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith. And I pray that you, being rooted and established in love, 18 may have power, together with all the Lord’s holy people, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ, 19 and to know this love that surpasses knowledge—that you may be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God.

20 Now to him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to his power that is at work within us, 21 to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, for ever and ever! Amen."
Ephesians 3 14-21

Jesus is alive, and will hear our prayers, and can absolutely teach anyone who asks.
Upvote 0

Asking AI to explain Sunday observance when NT has no such command

Let's agree that calling Sunday the Sabbath day is biblically indefensible
You and I can agree to that of course. But it does not change the fact that most Christian confessions of faith affirm a edited/bent Sabbath commandment all the while affirming along with me and about 24 million of my friends, that the Sabbath commandment remains among the TEN and the TEN are all still valid.
, regardless of how your list of dead guys sees it.
Sad that when someone dies you think the Bible truths they promoted die with them. But you have free will of course
While we are there, let's also agree that the sum of using biblically indefensible claims against biblically indefensible claims is still biblically indefensible.
Yeah that is why I object to downsizing the TEN, and I object to deleting Isaiah 66:23 saying that all mankind keeps the Bible Sabbath in the New Earth, and I object to rejecting Christ's statement in Mark 2:27 that the Sabbath is made for mankind" and I object to ignoring the fact that Gospel accepting, Bible believing gentiles in Acts 13 ask for more gospel preaching to be scheduled for them on the next Sabbath.

I choose the Bible even when it is inconvenient to preferences against the Bible Sabbath

============ these are details so blatantly obvious even AI seem to get the point

.Conclusion
  • 1 Corinthians 16:2 is not describing a Sunday worship gathering. It is Paul’s instruction for each believer to privately set aside money at home on the first day of the week, so that when he came, the collection would already be prepared.
==
Q: is there a meeting described in 1 Cor 16 for week day 1
A: No

Q: So then it would be incorrect to list 1 Cor 16 as an example of gathering on the first day of the week for worship or to remember the resurrection

A: That’s correct — it would be incorrect to use 1 Corinthians 16:2 as an example of believers gathering for worship or to commemorate the resurrection on the first day of the week.

Why? (AI continues to address 1 Cor 16)

  • The Greek wording “par’ heautō” (translated “lay by him in store”) means each person privately, by himself, at home.
  • Paul’s instruction was about setting aside money individually so that when he arrived, the collection would already be prepared.
  • There is no mention of a worship service, communal gathering, or resurrection remembrance in this passage.
  • “Lay by him in store” — The Greek phrase (par’ heautō) literally means “by himself” or “at home.”
    • This suggests Paul was instructing each believer to set aside money privately, not to bring it to a public meeting.
    • Purpose: Paul wanted the funds ready when he arrived, so there would be no need for hurried collections.
    • Not a Worship Gathering: The verse does not describe a church service or communal worship on Sunday. It is about personal preparation for a future offering.
    • Contrast with Acts 20:7: That passage does describe believers gathering on the first day of the week. But 1 Corinthians 16:2 is about individual action, not a meeting.


Q: so then you have exactly one example of gathering on the first day of the week for communion and it was the special occassion of a farewell event as Paul was leaving the next day. There is no record of the Acts 20 gathering being held on the Lord's Day. Since this is the one and only record of a service held on Sunday ,and no text says that the first day is the Lord's day, and they continued worship services on Sabbzth Saturday, does scripture say they met weekly on Sunday for worship

A: You’ve summarized the evidence very well — and the answer is no, Scripture does not say that the New Testament church met weekly on Sunday for worship.

What the Bible Records

  • Sabbath (Saturday) gatherings:
    • Acts 13:42–44 — Gentiles asked Paul to preach again the next Sabbath.
    • Acts 16:13 — Paul went to a place of prayer on the Sabbath.
    • Acts 17:2 — Paul reasoned in the synagogue for three Sabbaths.
    • Acts 18:4 — Paul preached every Sabbath to Jews and Gentiles.
  • First day of the week (Sunday):
    • Acts 20:7 — One special farewell meeting where Paul preached late into the night before departing.
    • 1 Corinthians 16:2 — Instruction for believers to set aside money privately at home on the first day, not a worship service.
Key Observations

  • Only one recorded Sunday gathering (Acts 20:7): And it was a unique farewell occasion, not a regular weekly service.
  • No text calls Sunday “the Lord’s Day”: The New Testament never equates the “first day of the week” with “the Lord’s Day.”
  • No command to change the Sabbath: The Bible consistently identifies the Sabbath as the seventh day, and there is no passage that institutes Sunday as a weekly day of worship.
  • Pattern of worship: The consistent pattern in Acts is Sabbath observance and preaching, even among Gentiles.
✅ Conclusion

Scripture shows continued Sabbath worship after the cross and records one special Sunday meeting, but it does not say the church met weekly on Sunday for worship. The idea of Sunday as a regular day of worship developed later in church history, not from the New Testament itself.
Upvote 0

Non-distinct Sinners

How amazingly different Paul’s method of “provoking the Jews to jealousy” (Rom 11:11), from that pursued by many Jewish mission workers today! From them the Jew must have a “special” place as a Jew. In some quarters they are even organizing “Messianic assemblies” (the Lord Jesus will not be returning as the Messiah again—NC).

All this, we cannot but feel, is kowtowing to Jewish flesh, and hinders their salvation. Jews now are common sinners, who have for the present been set aside nationally (but will bring them back as always—NC), and must come to rely, as individual sinners, hopelessly guilty and helpless, upon the shed Blood of Christ, and upon Him risen from the dead. It is an awful thing to make present day “Jewish” claims, when God says Jews are, during this present dispensation, no different from Gentiles, before Him: but are just sinners!

There are those who insist that the Jew has a special place right through this dispensation; that he must always be “first,” that there is a difference, although Goad says plainly in Romans 3 that there is no difference as to the Lordship of Christ and the availability of salvation to the “whosevers,” Jew or Gentile. If Paul were among us today, he would abhor and decry the special, esoteric methods of approach to the Jew in vogue in some pretentious quarters today. Become all things” (1Co 9:22) to the Jew, to win him, certainly. Paul did. But tell him the truth that he is just a whosoever.

What the poor, Jewish exiles need this hour is a Paul to go right in among them with a “whosoever” message for sinners, “provoking them to jealousy” (Rom 11:11) by boasting in a Savior whom their nation has lost—a nation to whom God is not now offering a Messiah, but instead salvation, as common “whosoever” no—distinction people, ordinary guilty lost sinners. In Acts 28 God through Paul officially closed the door to the national offer of the Gospel to the Jews; therefor to treat the Jew as having a special place with God, is to deny Scripture.

In Acts 28:25, 28 Paul officially shuts the door to national Israel: “Well spoke the Holy Ghost by Esaias the prophet unto our fathers . . . Be it known therefore unto you, that the salvation of God is sent unto the Gentiles, and that they will hear it” (Rom 2:14, 15).

Since this awful use of Isaiah 6, the Gospel has no Jewish bounds or bonds whatever, and it is presumption and danger now, to give the Jews any other place than that of common sinners! “No distinction between Jew and Greek,” says God (Rom 10:12). Those who preach thus have God’s blessing. Those that would give any special place whatever to Jews, since that day, do so contrary to the Gospel; and, we fear, for private advantage.

Tell Jews the truth! Their Messiah was offered to their nation, and rejected. God is not offering a Messiah to Israel now, but has Himself rejected them: all except a “remnant,” who leave Jewish earthly hopes, break down into sinners only, and receive a sinners Savior—not a Jewish one! Then they become “partakers of the heavenly calling” (Heb 3:1).


—Wm R Newell (1868-1956)




MJS daily devotional excerpt for December 16

“Self-disappointment is a very different thing from self-judgment. Indeed, if there were true self-judgment there would never have to be self-disappointment. If in honesty and sobriety of heart I have judged ‘that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing,’ I shall certainly not expect anything from myself, and it has been well said that where there is no expectation there can be no disappointment.

“But I feel sure that many young believers, and I dare say some old ones too, are very familiar with the wretched and depressing experience of self-disappointment. They have made many fresh starts; they have often been stirred up, and have made up their minds to be more for Christ; they have thought, ‘I shall do better now; I am more earnest about it than I was before’; but it has all ended in disappointment.

“They have no idea that they are trying to improve themselves; they would repudiate such a thought; they suppose that they know better than to look for good in themselves. And yet their disappointment is the plain proof that, in spite of all their knowledge of Scripture, they have expected to make themselves different, for they are disappointed because they have not succeeded in doing so.”

Charles Andrew Coates (1862-1945)

State leaders speak out about plans to expand the Islamic Academy of Alabama

Alabama’s senior senator has accelerated attacks on Americans of the Islamic faith and called for their forced deportation.

U.S. Sen. Tommy Tuberville accelerated attacks on Muslim Americans over the weekend, calling for the forced deportation of those of the Islamic faith.

The Alabama Republican’s remarks followed attacks on a school for Muslim children and Somali immigrants in Minnesota, accompanied by the filing of two bills targeting Muslims.

In recent days, Tuberville accelerated his assaults. On Sunday, Tuberville’s Facebook account posted a statement that said Islam is “not a religion. It’s a cult.” and claimed that “Islamists aren’t here to assimilate. They’re here to conquer.”

“Stop worrying about offending the pearl clutchers,” the statement said. “We’ve got to SEND THEM HOME NOW or we’ll become the United Caliphate of America.”

He also referred to the Islamic Academy of Alabama, which withdrew a proposal relocate to Hoover amid criticism and threats.

“I was asked about it,” Tuberville said during his comments on Thursday. “And I said the only place this Islamic academy should be moving is out of Alabama and out of our country.”

A spokesperson for the school declined to comment on Tuberville’s statement, referring instead to a news release published after the Hoover planning and zoning committee denied the school’s proposal to move its site from Homewood.

“Not one word of these allegations reflects the teachings, values, curriculum or culture of our school,” Stacy Abdein, the school’s assistant principal said in the news release. “They are irresponsible fabrications that fuel fear, prejudice and division.”
Well, if they really are here to conquer, maybe we should let them conquer Alabama first, and then send them away.
Upvote 0

The law, the commandments, and Christians.

What does that even mean? If we were actively breaking the commandments we only prove that we don't even know Christ, let alone love Him and neighbor.
you're conflating not to mention bifurcating law. in ex 20 the 10 are introduced. Ex 24 there is a blood covenant (all before the tablets) In between those chapters is a whole pile of laws and commandments not of Moses but of God and this is the covenant that was formed to which the 10 are an inseparable part. the covenant is not just regarding the 10, it's the whole thing. so when you say "actively breaking" what you are really are saying is there are some we can actively break and others we can't but the distinction is biblically indefensible and we need to relay on post biblical tampering to understand what laws of the old covenant are not obsolete and what laws are obsolete.

the 4th is not a moral claim. by letter the instruction is regarding ritual rest. your remarks about the 4th are not about rest they are about devotion to God and I suspect you mean something other than physical rest. the 4th is also unambiguously on the 7th day, I'm not sure what day you keep but if your tradition can speak for you it's not the 7th day. the 4th is also as much about not working for yourself as it is not causing others to work. this would demand us to go off the grid during the Sabbath which is something I doubt anyone actually does. there's a manpowered system at the end of all these services we use daily. if they are non-essential then our participation in them violates the 4th. I don't know what you keep or not keep but I suspect it's not the 4th according to the 4th, and it's some traditional/modern contextual variant of it.

the 4th points to Christ and he fulfills it in the same way he fulfills other ritual/ceremonial/symbolic components of the law like the sacrafice or circumsion (all commandments of law). I don't break the 4th in the same way I don't break the everlasting covenant of circumcision made with Abraham or in the same way I don't break sacrafical laws or other ceremonial aspects of the law. why does the 4th not come under the same scrutiny?
Upvote 0

Obamacare is collapsing. Republicans should let it

Twenty years ago, I wrote my first book with the late Bishop Harry Jackson, Personal Faith: Public Policy. Among the major issues we examined were immigration and health care. And here we are — two decades later — still listening to the same debates. Some issues in Washington are like that proverbial leaking roof: everyone knows it needs fixing, and every storm reminds us of the problem. But instead of grabbing a ladder and repairing it, the buckets just get moved around.

The current storm was created when Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and Chuck Schumer used the manufactured COVID-19 crisis as cover to spend billions more taxpayer dollars to prop up the failing Affordable Care Act (Obamacare). Many predicted this back in 2010, when Nancy Pelosi famously declared, “We have to pass it so we can read it,” as she pushed it through Congress without a single Republican vote. The so-called Affordable Care Act quickly became what many warned it would become — the unaffordable care act.

Democrats doubled down in March 2021 and again in August 2022, passing the American Rescue Plan Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, again without a single Republican vote. The first bill created temporary subsidies to mask the ACA’s structural failures, and the second extended this bailout until December 2025. Not only has the Affordable Care Act proven unaffordable — contrary to President Obama’s promises — it was deliberately crafted to bypass the longstanding bipartisan Hyde Amendment, which kept taxpayers out of the abortion business.

That brings us to the present dilemma for Republicans, who now find themselves the property managers of this leaking roof. They have inherited a failed, government-driven health system that funds abortion and pays for controversial experimental drugs and surgeries used in gender transitions.

Continued below.
This seems odd to me because of course the affordable care act has provided affordable insurance to enrollees. Hence why millions of people's health insurance premiums are going up along with the expiration of subsidies.

And that's not to say that health insurance costs aren't rising. Insurance companies have been charging more, along with hospitals and pharmaceutical companies. But that doesn't mean that the subsidies of the ACA aren't subsidizing health insurance and thus making it affordable for enrollees.

I suspect the opposite, that it is actually the GOP that would rather keep funds in the hands of insurance companies by keeping them deregulated. Unlike the democratic party that has been pushing for more regulation and even universal healthcare which in every modern country is the cheapest healthcare option around.
Upvote 0

I hold a view similar to the Open View of God.

It occurs to me that, by this particular verbiage, you may have in mind direct causation, and not indirect: "...because God created me in such a way so that I can only choose what is predetermined." It is not merely a matter of what you can or cannot do. It is a matter of what you WILL do.

This is sort of like one of the accusations against Calvinism (and Reformed theology), that goes something like this: "If Salvation is automatic, then what is the use of obeying or even choosing Christ?" But it is not automatic. It is only SURE.

But if it is SURE what I WILL do, I don't see how that does not affect what I can or cannot do. I can only do what I WILL do, for that is what is SURE. I cannot do what I WILL NOT do, because that is not SURE. This is circular reasoning.

John 6:37-45 "All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one coming to Me, I shall not cast out. For I have come down from heaven, not that I should do My will, but the will of the One having sent Me.

Now this is the will of the One having sent Me, that all that He has given Me, I should lose none of it, but will raise it up in the last day. For this is the will of My Father, that everyone beholding the Son and believing in Him should have eternal life, and I will raise him up in the last day.”...

... No one is able to come to Me unless the Father, the one having sent Me, draws him, and I will raise him up in the last day. It is written in the prophets: ‘And they will all be taught of God.' Everyone having heard from the Father and having learned, comes to Me.


(I don't claim to be Calvinist nor Reformed, though people keep mistaking me for it—it's just that most of what I believe, they do, too. I'm Calvinistic, I suppose you can say.)

John 6:44 could be construed in such a way that we are doomed unless selected to be drawn to God, but Jesus explains this in John 12:32 "And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself."

Humans are/have been drawn to God through Jesus sacrifice and the witness of his resurrection, which was spready by Christianity and continues to be spread today. Jesus specifically says he will draw all people, which if drawing people to God is selective would not be the case. Clearly, not everyone believes in Christ.
Upvote 0

Filter

Forum statistics

Threads
5,879,865
Messages
65,439,399
Members
276,453
Latest member
nickynick