Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I don't have one.Why not speak to your local church pastor or priest? You need someone in-person I think. Be blessed ...
No, it reflects errors on both sides.It reflects a decline in parenting.
Can you explain what you mean by this? For example, scripture prophesies about the second coming of Christ. Do you think that has a double fulfillment? Another example is that the dead will all be resurrected (John 5:28-29). Do you think that has a double fulfillment?Hello!
I'm undecided about eschatology but doing some research on it. I think good points are made for both amillennialism and premillennialism. The only view I currently hold to with is inaugurated eschatology (or "already and not yet") where most prophecy has double fulfillment.
I suppose that's technically possible, but I have not ever seen any premils who take that approach.It's normally associated with George Eldon Ladd, who was a premillennialist, but I don't see why one can't be amillennial and also agree with inaugurated eschatology.
I'm wondering if one can hold to a non-literalistic premillennialism?
Agree. It's usually Amils who see it that way, but some Premils see it that way, also. But, Amils see Revelation 20:9 as another angle of the return of Christ. It talks about fire coming down from heaven to destroy those who come against the camp of the saints. Amils take that to be referring to unbelievers opposing the church and then Jesus coming in flaming fire to take vengeance on them (2 Thess 1:7-10) by bringing fire down upon the entire earth (2 Peter 3:10-12).Like, I don't think the events in Revelation are strictly chronological and probably could be oit of order or just the same events from different angles.
Technically, yes, but I've never seen anyone claim to believe that.I also don't know if I believe the 1,000 years mentioned in the book to be be a literal millennium.
Could one believe in a Millennial State after the Second Coming, but not think the Millennial Kingdom will be a literal 1,000 years?
According to AI - it is a close up photograph of the top side of an intel Xeon Platinum 848+ processor
The golden/bronze color and the distinctive pattern of circles and squares are the exposed copper layers of the processor’s integrated heat spreader (IHS) after the nickel plating and lid have been removed (a process called “delidding”).
What you’re seeing is the actual silicon dies (the four large rectangular chips arranged around the center) and the surrounding copper heat-spreading structure that sits directly under the lid on these server-grade CPUs. The circular features are thermal vias and structural supports in the copper IHS.
Perhaps you have a different view of these tiles?
It really seems that you don't like the guy and that he's going to be bad new for NY. I think you don't want him to do well. But I Really like that you don't feel that you always have to agree withTrump. That's quite refreshing.
From here: Trump says he ‘absolutely’ would live in Mamdani’s New York during unexpectedly cordial first meeting – US politics live
'When asked by a reporter whether he would live in New York under Mamdani’s leadership, Trump said “absolutely”. “We agree on a lot more than I would have thought,” Trump said. “I want him to do a great job, and we’ll help them do a great job.”
And how much beyond our understanding? Beyond words even.The Church only has the fullness of revealed truth. There is much more to be learn as God see fit to reveal to us.
Yes you're right the old covenant could not save anyone.And I wrote. Heb. 9 :18.
#1. WHERE UPON //. HOTHEN. is an ADVERB
# 2 NEITHER. // OUDE. is an ADVERB
# 3. THE // is a DEFINATE ARTICLE in the NOMINATIVE CASE in the SINGULAR
# 4 FIRST // PROTOS in the NOMINATIVE CASE n the SINGULAR
# 5 ( TESTAMENT ). WAS DEDICATED //. EGKAINIZ. in the PERFECT TENSE in the INDICATIVE MOOD in. the SINGULAR
# 6 WITHOUT // CHORIS. is an. ADVERB
# 7 BLOOD //. HAIMA in. the GENITIVE CASE in. the SINGULAR in. the NEUTER
This isbn why the OLD COVENENT. could could not save BECAUSE CHRIST BLOOD had not yet shed
ON THE CROSS and why Gentiles would never be saved
AS ATONMENT was what kept all SAFE with. the
The PRIEST
The ALTER
THE SACIFICE
THE BLOOD THAT WAS SPRINKLED ON THE ALTER
dan p
www.city-journal.org
I'm saying that if we have true faith, then our works will reflect that.