Your Worst Anti-Catholic Experience

[Carrye]

But he assumes Catholics drinking the blood of Christ falls under the admonishment to not drink the blood of sacrificed animals or idols which of course we know we are not to partake in and wanted us only to answer based on that false premise.

I know.

 

[Skripper]

I'm a fine thanks.

But he assumes Catholics drinking the blood of Christ falls under the admonishment to not drink the blood of sacrificed animals or idols which of course we know we are not to partake in and wanted us only to answer based on that false premise.

Exactly. From false premises come false conclusions.

 

[Dicy mind]

Colacomp: You should read the posts that I have created here so that you would see why I rather hide. And that's because of the forum rules.
I simpl don't know how to have the kind of conversations you want to see and every one seems to have his/hers own way.

Shelb5: I think you misunderstand the fourth quote in my post #173 where I said that I am afraid of becoming convinced.

The treacherous thing about knowledge is that the truth has been hidden from the wise and prudent and revealed to babes.

 

[Skripper]

The treacherous thing about knowledge is that the truth has been hidden from the wise and prudent and revealed to babes.

I guess the "translation" here is supposed to be that you are one of the "babes" to which the "truth" has been "revealed," and that Catholics should chuck the teachings of the Catholic Church and opt instead for your version of Christian truth, apparently based upon your interpretations of Scripture and this "truth" that has been "revealed" to you? Wow.

 

[Dream]

The treacherous thing about knowledge is that the truth has been hidden from the wise and prudent and revealed to babes.

I don't get it. How can you trust Scripture that has been compiled by the "wise and prudent"?

 

[Skripper]

I don't get it. How can you trust Scripture that has been compiled by the "wise and prudent"?

Because it's been "revealed," of course . . . individual scriptural interpretation = "right," Catholic teaching = "wrong" (in any areas where the two may seem to conflict).

 

[Benedicta00]

Shelb5: I think you misunderstand the fourth quote in my post #173 where I said that I am afraid of becoming convinced.

Like I said Dicy- you ask us questions, filled with false premises. We ask you where are you getting these premises from, we are not asking you per say what do you believe.

We can not answer a question based on a false premise. Do you understand that?

We can not answer why we drink the blood of Christ when the bible says that drinking blood is a sin. *you* dicy, not the bible but *you* have formulated a premise that the admonishment includes what Catholic do at communion while you IGNORE!!!! scripture, that explains to you that obviously we can not reasonably believe that the Eucharist is part of this admonishment. All we are asking you to do is explain to us where you get this notion from that the admonishment was against Holy Communion when the writer of the admonishment was offering the Mass and indeed was “drinking” Christ blood?

You want to talk about 2+2=6? There you go but you do not want to discuss this rationally- you just want to spew your superior understanding of scripture and what you have concluded all by yourself against what the apostles practiced before the NT scriptures was even written.

Can you answer this? How do you reconcile the verses you present with the verses (and historical facts) we present that contradict your premise?

Why do you, who is so superior in scripture reading then the Church, will not read the whole NT in context and just take certain verses, isolate them, and make them mean what you want them to mean?

The treacherous thing about knowledge is that the truth has been hidden from the wise and prudent and revealed to babes.

So are you trying to say you are a prophet? That God revealed the truth to you and is keeping it from Catholics?

Your evidence is what?

See?

We need to know the answers to these question if you honestly want us to take you seriously, we need to know on who's authority do you speak?

And until you can tell us, we will just have to look to the bible for our authority where Christ gave it to Peter.

 

[Dicy mind]

Wow, I don't promote my self nor my understanding. And please, I am not worthy to be a prophet.

Now, I don't ignore verses, our interpretation on the scriptures is fundementally so different because you take it literally while I don't take it all literally. so it may seem that I would be ignoring verses but I am not that foolish.

Let me ask you something, when you go at some one's house and take off your shoes, when do you put them back on again?

 

[Tulip]

Have anyone checked out the links Dicy have on his site. Links like this and this. This is very telling about how Dicy's view of the Catholic Christian Church is.

 

[Tulip]

Dicy and all non-Catholics. This is the rules for OBOB

Please take some time and read them. I read other subforums rules so I know the do's and don't's.

 

[Dicy mind]

Have anyone checked out the links Dicy have on his site. Links like this and this. This is very telling about how Dicy's view of the Catholic Christian Church is.

I have linked to CF too but that doesn't make me everything that is discussed in here.

 

[Dream]

Dicy Mind, what are you still doing here? What do you want?

 

[Tulip]

I have linked to CF too but that doesn't make me everything that is discussed in here.

Those two sites are very anti-Catholic and when you have links to them on your site make me suspect that you have anti-Catholic sentiments. And yes I noticed that you had a link to CF too and that tells me that this is a site you would recommend to others. And CF caters to most "flavours" of Christianity and I wouldn't be surprised if your "flavour" is in there too.

Have a nice and blessed Sunday from a fellow Northener.

 

[JCrawf]

Shelb, you did answer but you made questions too and I have asked several times not to ask about my beliefs.

Could it be that your main answer might go something along the lines that the Catholic Church is the 666 harlot of Babylon and the Pope is the Anti-christ or something in that nature, and thusly make it hard for us to take you seriously?

Silly me, of course that's what you mean!

Pax Tecum,

John

 

[Annabel Lee]

Dicey, the first of your sites I clicked on states that Pope John Paul II is burning in Hell.

You have the nerve to post hate sites in this forum?
Go away and take your evil sites with you.

 

[ctay]

I just checked out the first link. All I can say is there is one judge everyone has to go before. (under the false religion link the lutheran church is listed there too) I just wouldn't respond to this person anymore.

 

[Skripper]

At least we see where he gets his ideas from . . .

 

[alban]

Dicey, the first of your sites I clicked on states that Pope John Paul II is burning in Hell.

You have the nerve to post hate sites in this forum?
Go away and take your evil sites with you.

Just to point out that while both of those sites are absolutely horrible, they weren't posted here by Dicy.

 

[xristos.anesti]

Very informative sites.

I can see so much truth in them.

And the logic is just overpowering.

I wana think the same way.

I am a real boy.

 

[Skripper]

Selections of some article/essay titles from one of the sites:

"Pope Worships Mary"
"Catholicism is of the Devil"
"WARNING: The Catholic Church is a Big Hoax!"
"The Catholic Mary is a Devil"
"The Rosary is Blasphemy!"
"Hail Mary! Hail Satan!"

There are many, many more, of course. But it's apparent that these are some of the sources that have influenced our visitor's thinking.


http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False Religions/Roman Catholicism/catholic_mary_is_a_devil.htm