Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'm not sure I follow what you are saying.
Religious communities and churches are more than Bible interpretation mills working de novo every generation. Generally, Christians read the Scriptures within some type of tradition that shapes the kinds of hermeneutics they use to interpret the Scriptures. That's why I think confessionalism has more integrity, because it makes this mechanism more explicit, which makes us capable of more self-reflection. It isn't reduced to a pure social or personality-focused movement.
What are your personal beliefs on ecumenism, even in Christian churches?
Firstly that's redundant since ecumenism refers to the unity in churches to begin with.
Nextly, we were obviously never meant to be separate churches ideologically. The churches were separated by land and peoples and sooner or later differences of belief and customs grow about.
I think we will certainly be united completely when Christ returns but as for making efforts towards that I think we already have done an exceedingly good job.
The only thing that can unite our differences is the fullness of understanding which is required to explain those differences of doctrine. And that takes a very strong hand of authority in Christ much like an apostle's authority. So until we have apostles again and God multiplies visions, then we won't be seeing any of those efforts really stick. It requires apostle authority to unite two separate churches.
Maybe God is bringing about what I said. I read up on that movement and so far, there doesn't seem to be a focus on ecumenism with this movement. When apostleship is the very thing needed to do unite the churches you would think this would be their focus but rather they are focused on this:Many today believe we do indeed have “apostles” and also “prophets”. Are you aware of the “New Apostolic Reformation”? (NAR)
It is an effort to restore the will of God to the Christian faith. His clearly stated will concerning His followers was and still is "that they all may be ONE, even as I and my heavenly Father are ONE".
It is vital for all Christians to understand that, even though we may have some differences in teachings, that all Christian who share in God's Holy Spirit are One.What are your personal beliefs on ecumenism, even in Christian churches?
I have misgivings about ecumenism at times. Our church agreeing to altar and pulpit fellowship with the UMC seems premature, for instance, given the extremely loose nature of UMC confessionalism, if it exists at all. Plus the pietist background potentially makes it at odds with Lutheranism (especially the doctrine of Christian perfection and a different understanding of sin). And some of our agreements with the Reformed likewise conceded too much confessionally (even if I think Catholics and Reformed are closest to us in theology), amounting to a shallow kind of ecumenism where we simply sweep real disagreements aside in favor of idealism.
In the US nothing came out of it. Catholics have historically wanted everyone to become Catholic.
Maybe God is bringing about what I said. I read up on that movement and so far, there doesn't seem to be a focus on ecumenism with this movement. When apostleship is the very thing needed to do unite the churches you would think this would be their focus but rather they are focused on this:
So with yourselves, since you are eager for manifestations of the Spirit, strive to excel in building up the church. ~1 Corinthians 14:12
There is a clear emphasis on manifestations of the spirit and this has nothing to do with the authority of apostleship but rather the working of a prophet. So in my judgment they are prophets, not apostles.
Ha yeah. If they are doing that then there is no substance behind them at all. We have nothing to fear or even consider from this movement. But God will bring about the revelation soon enough, which will unite the churches as much as they will be until his return.There are both “prophets” and “apostles” in this movement. You are correct that many of them are focused on “manifestations” or “signs & wonders”, but there are also many who are focused on “ecumenism”. Do a search on how many of these leaders have united with the Pope.
The thing is, the unity they are calling for is at the expense of doctrine, period. It’s a false unity and Christians would do well to stay far away from it. Unfortunately, I have family and friends caught up in it.
Scripture plainly tells us many times to beware of false peace and lying signs and wonders, and also false prophets. We also know from the word of God that doctrine is in fact extremely important.
Take heed unto thyself, and unto the doctrine; continue in them: for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself, and them that hear thee. - 1 Timothy 4:16
Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. - Jude 3
Ha yeah. If they are doing that then there is no substance behind them at all. We have nothing to fear or even consider from this movement. But God will bring about the revelation soon enough, which will unite the churches as much as they will be until his return.
Sure. I do believe we are all already united in Him though. All true believers who are born again have the same Holy Spirit indwelling them.
Before answering the question in the OP, we have to ask what ecumenism means.
In the middle of the 20th Cent, there were thoughts of uniting all Protestant denominations into one. In sone countries this resulted in "united" churches e.g. Canada. In the US nothing came out of it. Catholics have historically wanted everyone to become Catholic.
At least in the US, that type of ecumenism more or less failed. Today it mostly means working together in areas where we can, recognizing each other as fellow Christians, and mutual recognition of sacraments.
I don't think a single large church organization is necessary, or even necessarily desirable. To me the basic unit of the Church is the congregation, and larger units are useful for common tasks and to provide a way to maintain accountability for clergy. So I think the second type of ecumenism is important. Particularly mutual recognition of sacraments. I consider closed communion to be sacrilege, because it turns Christ's table into the table of our own Church.
But this has not been fulfilled still:
For the earth will be filled with the knowledge of the glory of Yahweh as the waters cover the sea. ~Habakkuk 2:14
They shall not hurt or destroy in all my holy mountain; for the earth shall be full of the knowledge of Yahweh as the waters cover the sea. ~Isaiah 11:9
And it must be fulfilled before the coming of Christ for it says right after, this:
In that day the Lord will extend his hand yet a second time to recover the remnant that remains of his people, from Assyria, from Egypt, from Pathros, from Cush, from Elam, from Shinar, from Hamath, and from the coastlands of the sea. ~Isaiah 11:11
And this regathering of the people of Israel is happening now even in our day. And this word goes on to describe what the people of Israel will accomplish against their enemies and this also has yet to be accomplished but is near.
We will be on that day. That's what Christ was praying for. So in faith you are right. We will be one in him so we are one in him in faith. But as it is, even born again believers have their disagreements. Just look at Paul and Barnabas. There disagreement was so sharp that they had to split ways.Yes, well the prophecies concerning Israel are not something I know enough about at this point to comment.
I was simply referring to all true, born again believers, we are already one in Him.
There are several levels of ecumenical relations. I was thinking of something less than what we have been PCUSA and ELCA. What we have is what we call "full communion." This means that are doctrine and practice is close enough that we can do things like exchange pastors. I don't think that level of unity is practical or necessary across Christendom.Hedrick, I think sometimes ecumenically oriented statements can simply be sources of confusion. For instance, our joint document with the Reformed churches called Marburg Revisited (I'm not sure if it can be considered status confessionis exactly, but it's been referenced enough), where we suppossedly agree that our different views of the Eucharist are merely acceptable diversity.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?