You can say that as much as you want but the evidence fills those giant buildings we call museums and it all says you're wrong. The difference is I accept evolution and you believe whatever it is you believe. I don't have to believe. I don't need faith. I have evidence.Evolution is the biggest lie ever (almost perhaps). I guess now i should keep believing this and you in evolution. God bless.
Sorry, merely acknowledging our animal nature is not a reduction in our status.
We didn't just evolve from animals, we are animals. Just intelligent ones.To reduce man's status to that of an animal. I suppose it's necessary since every over bearing authoritarian tries it when they get the power. Satan is the father of lies and Trump is the modern preacher of this lie. See if you can count his number since he insists that the meeting with North Korea is on 6/12/18?
Evols should re-think their false statement that Humans evolved from animals since that is the biggest Lie ever told. Amen?
He does it in a way to separate African Americans from others. That's all. "They" are animals. It's a cheap way to keep "them" over "there" and "us" over "here."Then why does Trump call African Americans, animals? Is it to obtain a superior position to them? Of course it is. Calling Humans (children of God) Apes is the mark of an infidel.
Anyways me receiving the holy spirit in church was the nail in the coffin for: Other religions and evolution. And all the other assumtions you can make after having proof of God, like the bible is probably all true too. I wish you all can have that experience and find God.
If the Bible were all true then there would be physical evidence of it. There would be evidence of the world having been covered by a global flood. There is not. There would be evidence of the world being 6,000 years old. It is not. The Bible is wrong from the very first sentence. It says that God created the Heavens and the Earth. No, that didn't happen. The earth was not created in the beginning. The earth is made from heavy elements that did not exist in the early universe. To get heavy elements a star has to go nova or supernova. That means it was billions of years before a planet like the earth could have existed. The lifetime of a star. THEN and only then did the elements exist in the universe to have planets. And yes, I know the argument, God can do anything. But God does not DO anything. God uses natural processes, doesn't he?Anyways me receiving the holy spirit in church was the nail in the coffin for: Other religions and evolution. And all the other assumtions you can make after having proof of God, like the bible is probably all true too. I wish you all can have that experience and find God.
If the Bible were all true then there would be physical evidence of it. There would be evidence of the world having been covered by a global flood. There is not. There would be evidence of the world being 6,000 years old. It is not. The Bible is wrong from the very first sentence. It says that God created the Heavens and the Earth. No, that didn't happen. The earth was not created in the beginning. The earth is made from heavy elements that did not exist in the early universe. To get heavy elements a star has to go nova or supernova. That means it was billions of years before a planet like the earth could have existed. The lifetime of a star. THEN and only then did the elements exist in the universe to have planets. And yes, I know the argument, God can do anything. But God does not DO anything. God uses natural processes, doesn't he?
So you can say you received the holy spirit and that's great. But you can't say the Bible is all true because of that. Go find evidence and get back to me.
That's nice. You have fun doing that ok? I can testify to Endogenous Retrovirii and Deoxyribonucleic Acid. They are real to everyone. You have to stop saying "luck" and "lucky" because it's your misunderstanding that makes you think things have to be lucky to evolve. In short, mutations happen, they either help or hinder an organism. That organism can then either pass on its genes more easily or not. That's it. No luck involved.I actually believe in the old earth and the bible can be interpreted as such. I can testify to death about the existence of the Holy spirit and Jesus, they are real to me and to a lot of people. And natural process or not there is no such thing about lucky enough to have all we have. Have you heard about the fine tunning argument? that is not a bad one.
That's nice. You have fun doing that ok? I can testify to Endogenous Retrovirii and Deoxyribonucleic Acid. They are real to everyone. You have to stop saying "luck" and "lucky" because it's your misunderstanding that makes you think things have to be lucky to evolve. In short, mutations happen, they either help or hinder an organism. That organism can then either pass on its genes more easily or not. That's it. No luck involved.
I'm sure it's hard. Please stop using the argument that evolution is a lie because it's "lucky" and that can't be. You've been shown how it's a lie and to continue to use it is lying.Well i´m not going to discuss more with you because i don´t like to discuss like this.
The coelacanth situation is still not the same as what you are describing for humans. The evidence for coelacanths is like a sandwhich that's just bread with air in between; we have evidence for them existing 60-70 million years ago, and we have evidence for them existing now in the form of living species, but the fossil record in between those time frames is missing. At no point is there a coelacanth fossil that predates all other vertebrates. The human fossil record is like a sandwich with most of the desirable contents between the slices of bread, perhaps it could use a little more mustard or something, but otherwise is essentially complete. A human fossil dating 70 million years would be like the bottom slice of that sandwich suddenly teleporting 100 meters above the rest of the sandwhich, causing all of the contents to spill out.here you go. if we will find a 70my human fossil we can just claim that it just didnt leaved any fossil in the last 60-70 my, like in the coelacanths case. simple and easy.
It has happened with others, but your claim demands ALL but two. If your claims matched reality, in that mammals could independently evolve multiple times, that situation would have to be extremely common. Yet, you are incapable of showing it has occurred even once. Where is my strawberry with mammalian hair genes?first: if its possible with 3 species its also possible with many more.
Again, your claim demands ALL, not many. ALL. How many times do I have to say it in order for you to understand that?second: i also gave you an example of a gene that is share with a group of far species but not in many species between them.
Again, show me convergent loss that results in all but two distant lineages HAVING the gene, and you will have made your point. Until you do, you haven't.and in this case, as we can see- they solve it by convergent loss. as i said: no problem for evolution.
-_- because he is a disgrace to all tangerines.Then why does Trump call African Americans, animals?
Fine tuning ...I actually believe in the old earth and the bible can be interpreted as such. I can testify to death about the existence of the Holy spirit and Jesus, they are real to me and to a lot of people. And natural process or not there is no such thing about lucky enough to have all we have. Have you heard about the fine tunning argument? that is not a bad one.
Humans existing for that long would demand that chimpanzees be much more genetically dissimilar to us than to other apes by virtue of mutation rate.
Again, show me convergent loss that results in all but two distant lineages HAVING the gene, and you will have made your point. Until you do, you haven't.
Then why does Trump call African Americans, animals? Is it to obtain a superior position to them? Of course it is. Calling Humans (children of God) Apes is the mark of an infidel.
We didn't just evolve from animals, we are animals. Just intelligent ones.
He does it in a way to separate African Americans from others. That's all. "They" are animals. It's a cheap way to keep "them" over "there" and "us" over "here."
If the Bible were all true then there would be physical evidence of it.
There would be evidence of the world having been covered by a global flood. There is not.
There would be evidence of the world being 6,000 years old. It is not. The Bible is wrong from the very first sentence. It says that God created the Heavens and the Earth. No, that didn't happen. The earth was not created in the beginning. The earth is made from heavy elements that did not exist in the early universe. To get heavy elements a star has to go nova or supernova. That means it was billions of years before a planet like the earth could have existed. The lifetime of a star. THEN and only then did the elements exist in the universe to have planets.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?