Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Your Second Brain Is Your Gut
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jimmy D" data-source="post: 73204688" data-attributes="member: 366806"><p>I will make this my last post on Walcott then. You slandered him claiming that he discarded or covered up evidence of the Cambrian because it didn’t fit into evolutionary thinking.</p><p></p><p>This is a lie, his extensive publications show this and you have posted zero evidence to back up your claims apart from quotes like the one below, which show nothing of the sort.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So Walcott wasn’t entirely correct in his work? Nothing about covering up or discarding there. What you have shown is that his extensive work was there for all to see, even if he wasn’t entirely correct.</p><p></p><p>Do you not think scientific knowledge should be refined and improved over time?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jimmy D, post: 73204688, member: 366806"] I will make this my last post on Walcott then. You slandered him claiming that he discarded or covered up evidence of the Cambrian because it didn’t fit into evolutionary thinking. This is a lie, his extensive publications show this and you have posted zero evidence to back up your claims apart from quotes like the one below, which show nothing of the sort. So Walcott wasn’t entirely correct in his work? Nothing about covering up or discarding there. What you have shown is that his extensive work was there for all to see, even if he wasn’t entirely correct. Do you not think scientific knowledge should be refined and improved over time? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Your Second Brain Is Your Gut
Top
Bottom