"God commands men everywhere to repent"... Acts 17:30
None of us can obey any of God's commands in and of ourselves. If we can choose to obey His commands, apart from His enabling, then we get the credit.
Let's put it another way:
Can we keep every letter of the Law? Can we keep the 10 commandments? If we break one of these commandments or one letter of the Law, we are in sin of tresspassing against the entire Law!
Why then does God give commands we are unable to keep in our own strength? Some would argue that since God gave the command, then "man" must be able to make a free-will choice to obey that command. However, we see that the Command was given to SHOW we need Him to bring us to repentance. Just as the Law was given to SHOW us sin! Paul said that "I would not know sin unless it was for the Law." We couldn't keep the Law anymore than we can obey the command to repent!
Every command God gives is to show us that only He can fulfill that Law/Command IN US. His Spirit carries out His own commands in and through us and He gets the credit.
With all respect, Arminians argue that if God commands it, then logic dictates that we must be "able" to carry it out. This is not true. If this line of reasoning is true, then why don't we ALL obey the Law in it's entirety? The Law/Commands were given to SHOW sin and the need of God to "Work and will in us to accomplish His good pleasure."
"Apart from Me, you can do nothing, the flesh profits nothing."
If we can repent, which is a command given by God to His own, then we don't need the work of the Spirit to enable this. We can do this by ourselves, which gives us the credit for repentance. Repentance is a gift of God.
Again, God commands us things we cannot keep in order to show us that He is the One living in us to accomplish that very "will" He commanded.
"Unless I wash you, you have no part with Me." He must do the washing, He must enable us to repent, we cannot do either ourselves. It's all His work IN us.
None of us can obey any of God's commands in and of ourselves. If we can choose to obey His commands, apart from His enabling, then we get the credit.
Let's put it another way:
Can we keep every letter of the Law? Can we keep the 10 commandments? If we break one of these commandments or one letter of the Law, we are in sin of tresspassing against the entire Law!
Why then does God give commands we are unable to keep in our own strength? Some would argue that since God gave the command, then "man" must be able to make a free-will choice to obey that command. However, we see that the Command was given to SHOW we need Him to bring us to repentance. Just as the Law was given to SHOW us sin! Paul said that "I would not know sin unless it was for the Law." We couldn't keep the Law anymore than we can obey the command to repent!
Every command God gives is to show us that only He can fulfill that Law/Command IN US. His Spirit carries out His own commands in and through us and He gets the credit.
With all respect, Arminians argue that if God commands it, then logic dictates that we must be "able" to carry it out. This is not true. If this line of reasoning is true, then why don't we ALL obey the Law in it's entirety? The Law/Commands were given to SHOW sin and the need of God to "Work and will in us to accomplish His good pleasure."
"Apart from Me, you can do nothing, the flesh profits nothing."
If we can repent, which is a command given by God to His own, then we don't need the work of the Spirit to enable this. We can do this by ourselves, which gives us the credit for repentance. Repentance is a gift of God.
Again, God commands us things we cannot keep in order to show us that He is the One living in us to accomplish that very "will" He commanded.
"Unless I wash you, you have no part with Me." He must do the washing, He must enable us to repent, we cannot do either ourselves. It's all His work IN us.