Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is it good and moral, though, that God DEMANDS said recognition?It is good to recognize how God is holy and recognize that this can be good for us.
Yes, I am fully aware that God is both triune and monotheisticIncorrect...
God is both Triune and Monotheistic.
There is no dualism in the Godhead - this is an Eastern concept and is a deception.
What about Justice? If you want to divide God up into aspects or attributes you can't leave out Justice. Yin and Yang are of the natural world. Totally inappropriate in referring to God.I don't understand how you can disagree with my assessment that God is more concerned with the HOLY aspect of His nature than He is with the LOVE aspect of His nature?
Did not Jesus, Himself, make it perfectly clear that God is primarily concerned with His own glorification when He said that loving God is the FIRST AND GREATEST commandment?
Yes, I am fully aware that God is both triune and monotheistic
That said, there are many aspects to God's nature, most if not all of which, fit neatly into one of two primary attributes - God as LOVE and God's HOLINESS
I see nothing wrong with describing the Christian God as a dualistic god on this basis
As for the concept of Yin & Yang, I invoked the term simply for the sole purpose of illustrating that of God's two primary attributes - the one overpowers the other and God's love is not complemented and balanced in equal and perfect harmony by His holiness
I don't have a problem that God gets praised due His holiness
I have a problem that God demands to be praised for His holiness
I do not see God as being dualistic in Scripture, nor do I see a yin and yang here (which is part of a completely different religion).
We understand that He tells us to praise Him because He knows it is good to do this.I don't have a problem that God gets praised due His holiness
I have a problem that God demands to be praised for His holiness
He knows what is good; so He commands this. And I have offered how this needs to be done . . . not out of fear while feeling distant and feeling God is being impersonal with us . . . not merely like flattery or out of fear and trying to get points.Offering praise to a perfect being is something I would gladly engage in myself
That said, can a being that demands praise truly be called perfect?
On the cross, we see both. Jesus was loving, and Jesus was holy > "without sin" (Hebrews 4:15). Jesus is so well-pleasing to our Father and He is love and holiness all in one. We don't try to dissect Jesus into love here and holy there.I don't understand how you can disagree with my assessment that God is more concerned with the HOLY aspect of His nature than He is with the LOVE aspect of His nature?
But Jesus did say the love-your-neighbor command is "like it" . . . right?Did not Jesus, Himself, make it perfectly clear that God is primarily concerned with His own glorification when He said that loving God is the FIRST AND GREATEST commandment?
I have offered some things about this in another post.Is it good and moral, though, that God DEMANDS said recognition?
I do not see God as being dualistic in Scripture, nor do I see a yin and yang here (which is part of a completely different religion).
However, you are correct in saying that God in Scripture is both a God of love and is holy. Where I disagree with you is in definitions and conclusions.
I can agree with you mostly on your definition of love here.
I am with you so far.
I went to a very memorable Christian Conference that was put on by Youth For Christ while I was in high school. One of the topics that was emphasized was “Set Apart,” which definitely has to do with holiness. This is also seen in Scripture when God talks about objects in the temple being holy/set apart, and even how he talks about people being holy/set apart.
This is where I begin to differ from you, especially the last part you wrote there. According to the Bible, people can be made holy by God. This certainly doesn’t mean that those individuals should be exalted or praised or worthy of devotion.
Holiness is neither inward or outwardly directed, as I understand the concept.
God’s holiness is definitely different from any other kind, but that doesn’t make His holiness selfish. (And selfishness can’t really be an attribute of God anyway, when you consider all that Scripture says about God. Selfishness is a human problem).
God’s holiness is not in opposition to His love.
God’s love is all over the Bible. Here are a few examples:
16 “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world might be saved through Him.
John 3:16-17 NASB 95
But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
Romans 5:8 NASB 95
The one who does not love does not know God, for God is love. By this the love of God was manifested in us, that God has sent His only begotten Son into the world so that we might live through Him. In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins. Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another. No one has seen God at any time; if we love one another, God abides in us, and His love is perfected in us.
1 John 4:8-12 NASB 95
There are many other examples in the Bible.
So as can be seen from the selected Scriptures above, I don’t think that God is selfish at all.
Sorry, I haven't yet figured out how to reply point by point and ended up deleting my attempt!This reply is empty?
From the Tao Te Ching
In the natural world opposites are in relationship. Love and Holiness are not opposites.
When people see some things as beautiful,
other things become ugly.
When people see some things as good,
other things become bad.
Being and non-being create each other.
Difficult and easy support each other.
Long and short define each other.
High and low depend on each other.
Before and after follow each other.
OkaySorry, I haven't yet figured out how to reply point by point and ended up deleting my attempt!
Scripture tells us that God created us FOR HIS OWN GLORY, so that His Holy name be proclaimed - not because He loves us and wanted to give us a precious gift of lifeI would not agree with that. Nor would I agree that Yin and Yang have anything to do with God. God transcends duality. Yin and Yang are aspects of the created universe. In God holiness and love are unified.
I did respond to you in post #30 - just not in a quoted, point by point format!Okay. No problem. Take your time
I think that is quite distorted. It appears to me that Love is integral to Holiness. "Holiness is about receiving"? Inward directed? Not necessarily so at all.Love is about others
Holiness {of which God is, ultimately, the sole possessor} is about self
Love is about giving
Holiness is about receiving
Love is outwardly directed
Holiness is inwardly directed
Love and holiness certainly appear, to me, to be opposites
Holiness and Love are not dual natures in the way that ying and yang are traditionally presented. Ying/yang philosophy holds that evil is just as necessary as good. That they balance each other out.
But we know that our God loves what is good and hates what is evil. In fact, it is this very trait that make Him holy, though many would argue that this is a bad thing.
So no, you will not find ying/yang in the bible. In fact I would wonder at those who thought they had found it in scripture. Holiness and Love are two distinct natures, yes. But one is a direct result of the other. God has other traits too. But He has no cognitive dissonance or conflicts about any of them. He is eternal and He is also omnipotent. He is omniscient as well as omnipresent. I see no conflict of natures here. Why should anyone?
becauseWith this in mind, how can you disagree that God is more concerned with the holiness aspect of His nature than He is with the love aspect of His nature?
Love is integral to holiness?I think that is quite distorted. It appears to me that Love is integral to Holiness. "Holiness is about receiving"? Inward directed? Not necessarily so at all.
I'm not denying that God is lovebecause
1 John 4
16 So we have come to know and to believe the love that God has for us. God is love, and whoever abides in love abides in God, and God abides in him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?