To every believer in Jesus Christ, the sole authority is the written word of God. Otherwise we just whistle in the wind. I'm not up for that sort of waste of time, thanks.
What God says is FINAL. PERIOD. Debating Him is idiocy.
Entirely untrue. Scripture alone can not help anyone. After all, how could one read Scripture without a rational mind that understands the language in which it is written? So, logic is needed. And, what good is a mind with logic in it if it does not have experience of the world around it, to ground the truths it is presented? So, experience is needed. Finally, how can one maintain communion with the whole of Christianity if past understanding of the Scripture is not at least acknowledged? So, tradition is helpful.
And thus, the Wesleyan quadrilateral: Scripture, reason, experience, and tradition.
You really need to be careful when you make claims like "All Christians believe |fill-in-the-blank|".
Entirely untrue. Scripture alone can not help anyone. After all, how could one read Scripture without a rational mind that understands the language in which it is written? So, logic is needed. And, what good is a mind with logic in it if it does not have experience of the world around it, to ground the truths it is presented? So, experience is needed. Finally, how can one maintain communion with the whole of Christianity if past understanding of the Scripture is not at least acknowledged? So, tradition is helpful.
And thus, the Wesleyan quadrilateral: Scripture, reason, experience, and tradition.
You really need to be careful when you make claims like "All Christians believe |fill-in-the-blank|".
From the revelations of the Spirit of God to the faithful have come the scriptures of Truth, which contain: (1) a faithful historical account of the behavior of God's people in various ages and of the many unusual and remarkable acts of God which they experienced, (2) a prophetic account of some things already past, and of others yet to come, (3) a full and adequate account of all of the chief principles of the doctrine of Christ which were spoken, or which were written, by the motions of God's Spirit at various times in treasured declarations, exhortations, and maxims which were given to certain churches and their pastors.
Nevertheless, because the scriptures are only a declaration of the source, and not the source itself, they are not to be considered the principal foundation of all truth and knowledge. They are not even to be considered as the adequate primary rule of all faith and practice. Yet, because they give a true and faithful testimony of the source itself, they are and may be regarded as a secondary rule that is subordinate to the Spirit, from which they obtain all their excellence and certainty.
We truly know them only by the inward testimony of the Spirit or, as the scriptures themselves say, the Spirit is the guide by which the faithful are led into all Truth (John 16:13). Therefore, according to the scriptures, the Spirit is the first and principal leader (Rom 8:14). Because we are receptive to the scriptures, as the product of the Spirit, it is for that very reason that the Spirit is the primary and principal rule of faith.
You're opinion is duly noted. However perhaps you might like to comment on Christ saying that it was the SPIRIT of God that would lead us into all truth not the scriptures or is that bunk too?
In a Christian forum, YES they do.
Evidence and Scripture, which is THE authority around here, has been given, ad nauseam. Nothing has been unfair here regarding the discussion.
The Bible is not the only truth in the world, therefore, no they don't
perhaps unfair was the wrong word, though i'm not quite sure what the correct word would be. either way, something was definitely wrong (i'm sorry that you and Zaak were the one's at fault) and i wanted to make things right. also, just because you have given evidence (which i have no doubt was sufficiently responded to be Tissue) doesn't mean that you are excused from giving more evidence. attacking a person is not evidence for anything. Tissue was still debating the issue, obviously you were losing and so descended into using cheap personal assaults to try and protect you pride. i'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but i think your failure to show Christian love in your posting deserves it.
The only real truth can be found in the written Word of God. Whether read or heard. That is how we know it.
John 17:17
Make them holy by your truth; teach them your word, which is truth.
If you are going to make anti-Christian claims and declare them Christian, you must give us Scriptural proof.
Unfair is the word. I was attacked as well, if you want to be fair about it. Can I have your shoulder to cry on, too?I think Tissue is smart enough not to make such a mistake but then i suppose i don't know that. the fact that you were attacked is no excuse to do the same. does "turn the other cheek" ring a bell?
We weren't losing!! LOL! I think that Christian charity ended with Tissues premise. Bringing an opinion of disunity and when corrected, digging in and defending it is unloving, and unteachable.
Good potential Christian leaders need to be at least teachable.
I never said you were, i said that if i had to choose someone as the winner, Tissue would be it since he was actually arguing, not committing falacies. a differing opinion does not have to sow disunity. Tissue's premise could be correct, i have not yet seen conclusive evidence to the contrary. if you're going to get so worked up over some because he or she has a different opinion on something than you, then i suggest you stop getting involved in these discussions. if you must continue, please understand that 1: you could be wrong (as could any other person on these board, myself included), 2: these discussions are not of eternal/salvation determining value, and 3: all posting should be done in Christian love and humility.
The Bible is not the only truth in the world, therefore, no they don't
perhaps unfair was the wrong word, though i'm not quite sure what the correct word would be. either way, something was definitely wrong (i'm sorry that you and Zaak were the one's at fault) and i wanted to make things right. also, just because you have given evidence (which i have no doubt was sufficiently responded to be Tissue) doesn't mean that you are excused from giving more evidence. attacking a person is not evidence for anything. Tissue was still debating the issue, obviously you were losing and so descended into using cheap personal assaults to try and protect you pride. i'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but i think your failure to show Christian love in your posting deserves it.
right. so 2+2=4 is not real truth....
It won't save your soul. The One who makes 2+2=4 will.
right. so 2+2=4 is not real truth....
I never said you were, i said that if i had to choose someone as the winner, Tissue would be it since he was actually arguing, not committing falacies. a differing opinion does not have to sow disunity. Tissue's premise could be correct, i have not yet seen conclusive evidence to the contrary. if you're going to get so worked up over some because he or she has a different opinion on something than you, then i suggest you stop getting involved in these discussions. if you must continue, please understand that 1: you could be wrong (as could any other person on these board, myself included), 2: these discussions are not of eternal/salvation determining value, and 3: all posting should be done in Christian love and humility.
truth is not defined by whether or not it will save my soul
In this thread it is.
Do you know Jesus as your personal Saviour and Lord?
What do you think? Is it fair that some people are going to go to hell?
HOW DOES ONE DOUBT A GOD WHOM THEY HAVE AProve it with 100% certainty.
After all if it's so easy to prove it won't be a problem will it.
And I'll assume anyone making a joke of it is unable to prove it, and therefore has doubt.