Ye Olde Republican Safe House (3)

[Zippythepinhead]

I heard them say that about you in General Apologetics but I didn't believe you had that many wives.

Yes it is the narcissistic side of me

 

[oldbetang]

967-Which self professed Christian stated the NT is steeped in bigotry? What is the post number or was that simply a dishonest claim? Unless a post # is provided we will know it was the latter.

http://christianforums.com/showpost.php?p=42980495&postcount=957

The word "steeped" isn't used but the implication is quite clear.

 

[Ginny]

I said it was Christians but the reponse was 'That couldnt be any farther from the truth.'

ETA: aw, crap..it's me on another subject. Sorry, I was wrong, RDNS. Same argument, different page.

 

[JustOneWay]

Excuse me but wasn't it you that misquted me to change what I had actually said?

Misquoting is a mistake. Are you claiming that mistakes are untruthful?

 

[Ginny]

Misquoting is against forum rules.

 

[JustOneWay]

Misquoting is against forum rules.

There is no rule. You are wrong.

 

[MachZer0]

What difference? You claim they are intolerant and you admit that you are intolerant. Looks like no difference.

The difference is that they claim tolerance while being intolerant. Hope that clears it up for you.

 

[MachZer0]

Misquoting is a mistake. Are you claiming that mistakes are untruthful?

The one of which I speak was no mistake. Wasn't that you?

 

[Ginny]

I need to look up that rule but will need help. I remember when I used to mod it was there....People could get "warned" based on misquoting people. If it is no longer there I apologize.

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

Ginny, thank you for that and it shows good integrity, even if it felt like a paper cut I get confused on stuff like that too.

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

985-Thanks for quoting the post so the false witness could be seen. In 966 you state it was claimed the NT is steeped in bigotry. Dont insult our intelligence by trying to hide behind the rhetorical question marks as they werent seeking clarification but wondering how a Christian could say that about the NT. Since i didnt say the NT is steeped in bigotry you need to retract the false statement because it is a lie. What i did say is how some PERCEIVE the NT. It's clear this was an attempt to smear me with a flat out bogus claim. There was no implication at all, especially since i always state Jesus preached equality for all of us.

 

[JustOneWay]

I need to look up that rule but will need help. I remember when I used to mod it was there....People could get "warned" based on misquoting people. If it is no longer there I apologize.

No problem Ginny.

One could say that what you said about the rule is not honest, or one could simply say it was a mistake. I choose to use the latter in this casE.
There is my point. I could have misquoted Mach, or a number of other people out of an honest mistake. Some are not afforded mistakes and they are called dishonest. Apparently that is what is happening to me right now.

 

[oldbetang]

985-Thanks for quoting the post so the false witness could be seen. In 966 you state it was claimed the NT is steeped in bigotry. Dont insult our intelligence by trying to hide behind the rhetorical question marks as they werent seeking clarification but wondering how a Christian could say that about the NT. Since i didnt say the NT is steeped in bigotry you need to retract the false statement because it is a lie. What i did say is how some PERCEIVE the NT. It's clear this was an attempt to smear me with a flat out bogus claim. There was no implication at all, especially since i always state Jesus preached equality for all of us.

Are the New Testament admonishments against sins based on bigotry or are they not? You've certainly implied that they are. Are you now going to retract your statement that biblical arguments against homosexuality are based on bigotry?

 

[MachZer0]

No problem Ginny.

One could say that what you said about the rule is not honest, or one could simply say it was a mistake. I choose to use the latter in this casE.
There is my point. I could have misquoted Mach, or a number of other people out of an honest mistake. Some are not afforded mistakes and they are called dishonest. Apparently that is what is happening to me right now.

And of course I'm speaking of a purposeful misquote which regardless of the rules would be dishonest. If that was you, and I believe it was, your claim to always be honest would only reflect on your dishonesty. If it was indeed you that is

 

[JustOneWay]

And of course I'm speaking of a purposeful misquote which regardless of the rules would be dishonest. If that was you, and I believe it was, your claim to always be honest would only reflect on your dishonesty. If it was indeed you that is

All this attention just to prove I am dishonest. I am touched

We both have admitted our mistakes in the past Mach.

 

[RealDealNeverstop]

How many times do i have to correct the same thing? I never said the NT admonishments on sin are based on bigotry. Looks like this is simply an attempt to keep hijacking what i said in order to justify the sin of false witness. My post was clear and I dont have anything else to say about it here. If peeps want to make false accusations that be between them and God.

 

[MachZer0]

All this attention just to prove I am dishonest. I am touched

We both have admitted our mistakes in the past Mach.

Well, let's take a look at it. Here is a post in an exchange between you and me

Gore never claimed that he invented the internet.

He did, however, suggest that if not for him, we wouldn't have the Internet. And one gets the impression that he believes without him, the planet cannot be saved. Has there ever been a greater American?

Here is the way you edited my post

And of course I didn't say it, but nice strawman

Gore never claimed that he invented the internet.

He did,

He did of course originally being part of my full statement

He did, however, suggest that if not for him, we wouldn't have the Internet.

And of course my complaint about your selevtive dishonest editing resulted in this comment from you

Just the old pot calling the kettle black.

So, it is here in black and white for all to see whether or not you are always honest.

 

[Zippythepinhead]

Honk if you see a Mormon Missionary! Ooops against the new rules. How rude of me

 

[JustOneWay]

Well, let's take a look at it. Here is a post in an exchange between you and me
Here is the way you edited my postHe did of course originally being part of my full statement

And of course my complaint about your selevtive dishonest editing resulted in this comment from youSo, it is here in black and white for all to see whether or not you are always honest.

I misread your post and posted a reply incorrectly

A mistake, an honest mistake

Why do I feel so safe in the safehouse

 

[JustOneWay]

Well, let's take a look at it. Here is a post in an exchange between you and me
Here is the way you edited my postHe did of course originally being part of my full statement

And of course my complaint about your selevtive dishonest editing resulted in this comment from youSo, it is here in black and white for all to see whether or not you are always honest.

Looks like somebody couldn't take a joke