Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Struggles by Non-Christians
Yahweh: Benevolent God of Bloodthirsty Monster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BleedingHeart" data-source="post: 57150829" data-attributes="member: 277139"><p>1. Gnostic atheism would, but I am not a gnostic atheist.</p><p>2. The burden of proof would not lie with anyone, since no one has made a claim. If a blind man says he doesn't/can't see the sun; that's not a claim, that's a statement of fact. If the blind man were to say there is absolutely no sun, then yes he would be required to prove it.</p><p>And didn't I tell you to stop with the analogies?</p><p> </p><p>3. Based on the extremely condescending way you phrased the question, the burden of proof would lie with those claiming to have witnessed/seen/observed/experienced/whatever God or Jesus Christ or whatever. What you have to understand about the burden of proof is that it's not based on which side has more people on it; it's based on those making a strong claim.</p><p>4. "I have no need to prove God's existence". You do have a need if you care about whether you are right or wrong. The funny thing about you is that you offer "zero evidence" for your claims and then in other threads you say that atheists are in denial.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BleedingHeart, post: 57150829, member: 277139"] 1. Gnostic atheism would, but I am not a gnostic atheist. 2. The burden of proof would not lie with anyone, since no one has made a claim. If a blind man says he doesn't/can't see the sun; that's not a claim, that's a statement of fact. If the blind man were to say there is absolutely no sun, then yes he would be required to prove it. And didn't I tell you to stop with the analogies? 3. Based on the extremely condescending way you phrased the question, the burden of proof would lie with those claiming to have witnessed/seen/observed/experienced/whatever God or Jesus Christ or whatever. What you have to understand about the burden of proof is that it's not based on which side has more people on it; it's based on those making a strong claim. 4. "I have no need to prove God's existence". You do have a need if you care about whether you are right or wrong. The funny thing about you is that you offer "zero evidence" for your claims and then in other threads you say that atheists are in denial. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Struggles by Non-Christians
Yahweh: Benevolent God of Bloodthirsty Monster?
Top
Bottom