Almost all the books I read (contemporary fiction) have a specific setting, i.e., New York City, Chicago, whatever. When I write, I don't specify where it's taking place, although I do have some kind of general idea in mind. Part of the reason I think I do this is because I am not exactly a well-traveled person, and I feel like if I were to set a story in a specific place, then I need to know a good deal of information about that place for accuracy's sake.
Do you think it's essential to give a specific setting or is it okay to keep it vague like I have been doing? In the case of a small-town setting, I've thought of using a fictional town in a real state, so that people would have the idea of what the terrain and climate would be like while still allowing me the creativity to make up whatever aspects of the town I wanted. But, the story I'm currently working on takes place in a kind of large city.
Anyway, I was just wondering what your ideas/thoughts on this subject are.
Do you think it's essential to give a specific setting or is it okay to keep it vague like I have been doing? In the case of a small-town setting, I've thought of using a fictional town in a real state, so that people would have the idea of what the terrain and climate would be like while still allowing me the creativity to make up whatever aspects of the town I wanted. But, the story I'm currently working on takes place in a kind of large city.
Anyway, I was just wondering what your ideas/thoughts on this subject are.