Would you support Trump if he ignored an SC decision?

[A2SG]

What Biden said is a lie according to you

Funny, I don't recall saying any such thing. Care to provide a quote of me saying that?

-- A2SG, memory must be slipping....

 

[Postvieww]

You've been asked to address the op's question multiple times....

Are you afraid to take a stand - either way?

Would you support Trump if he ignored an SC decision?

Yes or No.

Sounds like a liberal broken record. 1. Will you say Biben won the election yes or no 2. Will you say Snowden was a traitor, yes or no 3. Will you honor Roe, yes or no, remember that one . Not interested in playing the liberal gotcha game.

 

[Diamond72]

What Biden said is a lie according to you

You do know that puppets do not actually talk. Their mouth may move but someone else is talking.

 

[wing2000]

Sounds like a liberal broken record. 1. Will you say Biben won the election yes or no 2. Will you say Snowden was a traitor, yes or no 3. Will you honor Roe, yes or no, remember that one . Not interested in playing the liberal gotcha game.

Asking if a sitting POTUS will honor the ruling of the USSC is a "liberal gothca game"?

 

[Diamond72]

Asking if a sitting POTUS will honor the ruling of the USSC is a "liberal gothca game"?

Liberals are desperate to find anything they can find to use against the conservative agenda.

 

[Aryeh Jay]

You do know that puppets do not actually talk. Their mouth may move but someone else is talking.

And sometimes you see the puppeteer in the oval office with his kid.

 

[BPPLEE]

And sometimes you see the puppeteer in the oval office with his kid.

I've seen George Soros' kid with a slew of Democrats

 

[Always in His Presence]

Yes, it is. But hey, I know. Let's change it so that you can answer it. Would you support a Democratic president disobeying an SC decision? I'm going to assume that your answer wouldn't be based on the politics of the matter (I mean, surely not!) and would then apply to any president.

By the way, don't tell anyone this, but there's a subtext here. It's that some people expect Trump supporters to do anything except answer the question. Thereby (and you'll laugh when I tell you) telling us what we wanted to know anyway! You'd think that they'd avoid the thread because of that, but...there you go.

Also a hypothetical -

 

[wing2000]

Liberals are desperate to find anything they can find to use against the conservative agenda.

Ignoring the separation of powers that has served our democratic republic for the last 250 years is NOT a conservative agenda.

 

[Bradskii]

Also a hypothetical -

Yes, it is. They come in handy for finding out what position someone is likely to hold. Thanks for the heads up on yours.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Yes, it is. They come in handy for finding out what position someone is likely to hold. Thanks for the heads up on yours.

Yup I like to stay in reality.

Kinda like if I asked you if you found out the Biden’s and Clinton’s were behind the Russia investigation and all the lawfare against Trump would you still support them?

 

[Diamond72]

Ignoring the separation of powers that has served our democratic republic for the last 250 years is NOT a conservative agenda.

First of all, it is a liberal lie that anyone is ignoring anything. They just make this stuff up to attack Trump. Every time we have a new president they hire a new administration. There is nothing different this time than what goes on with every new president. There is no evidence that anyone is doing anything. When people get fired you quit paying them. Period the end. That is what it means to be fired. If Trump or Musk want to get rid of a lot of dead-weight people who do nothing to earn their pay then we are all better off to give them the boot.

 

[Bradskii]

Yup I like to stay in reality.

Kinda like if I asked you if you found out the Biden’s and Clinton’s were behind the Russia investigation and all the lawfare against Trump would you still support them?

Using the legal system in an illegal way? No. Now if I had said 'well, that's just a hypothetical and I'm not going to answer it' then you'd know my position.

 

[BPPLEE]

Using the legal system in an illegal way? No. Now if I had said 'well, that's just a hypothetical and I'm not going to answer it' then you'd know my position.

Except that Hillary was behind it.
She paid for a dossier ( through a law firm) that the FBI fraudulently used to obtain a FISA warrant.
Anything else that was found as a result of that investigation should have been thrown out as fruit of the poisonous tree

 

[Bradskii]

Except that Hillary was behind it.
She paid for a dossier ( through a law firm) that the FBI fraudulently used to obtain a FISA warrant.
Anything else that was found as a result of that investigation should have been thrown out as fruit of the poisonous tree

Well, gee. Really? Then you should have applied to the courts for that to have been done.

 

[BPPLEE]

Well, gee. Really? Then you should have applied to the courts for that to have been done.

I don't know what that is supposed to mean but if you are doubting what I posted, it's been well established

Newly Declassified Document Indicates FBI Misled Congress on Reliability of Steele Dossier | United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary

WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) today released a...

www.judiciary.senate.gov

“This document clearly shows that the FBI was continuing to mislead regarding the reliability of the Steele dossier. The FBI did to the Senate Intelligence Committee what the Department of Justice and FBI had previously done to the FISA Court: mischaracterize, mislead and lie. The characterizations regarding the dossier were completely out of touch with reality in terms of what the Russian sub-source actually said to the FBI.

“What does this mean? That Congress as well as the FISA Court was lied to about the reliability of the Russian sub-source. I

The dossier was paid for by Hillary

DNC, Clinton campaign agree to Steele dossier funding fine

Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee have agreed to pay $113,000 to settle a Federal Election Commission investigation.

apnews.com

I don't know if you're familiar with US law but any evidence obtained as the result of a fraudulently obtained warrant is inadmissible

Fruit of the poisonous tree - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Fruit of the poisonous tree is a legal metaphor used to describe evidencethat is obtained illegally.[1] The logic of the terminology is that if the source (the "tree") of the evidence or evidence itself is tainted, then anything gained (the "fruit") from it is tainted as well.

 

[Bradskii]

I don't know what that is supposed to mean...

It means exactly what I said. If you have a problem with a legal matter then you take it to court.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Using the legal system in an illegal way? No. Now if I had said 'well, that's just a hypothetical and I'm not going to answer it' then you'd know my position.

Yup, that you only deal with real life.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Polling related to the topic.