The mechanics of this business model are defined here:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...0575AC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print
Simply: You can give anyone a subprime mortgage who is willing to take it, irregardless of whether they can afford it or not, and then hand it over to Fannie to get back your money plus some. Easy money!
Speaking hypothetically:
If you asked me in 1999, when this business model became available, there is an 80% percent chance I would refuse on moral grounds. I would not willingly hand the taker (borrower) something that I know will ultimately financially ruin him for many years. Nor would I betray the trust of a crown (government) corporation so easily.
Fast forward to 2005-6, and you would find a different me. Witnessing unethical companies in my industry (again, role playing here) “making a killing” issuing subprime mortgages to anyone and everyone, the frenzy that then ensued by my peers to do the same, and all the housing market media hype, I would probably become delusional, and join the frenzy. The questions and rationalization that would predominate in my mind:
“How can it be wrong if everyone is doing it?”
“What difference does it make if I do it too?”
“Poor people won't think of getting these mortgages; they are not the one’s getting them, since the house prices are so high.”
“I can make an xxx amount of money in so little time. YAHHHOOOO! MORALS BE GONE! But I’m still good; I think….”
This time, there would be an 80% chance that I would be a participant in issuing subprime mortgages.
So, I’m going to have to answer yes to my own poll. Greed is that powerful. It is almost unintentional, and it certainly almost always oblivious. How do you avoid falling into this trap?
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpa...0575AC0A96F958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=print
Simply: You can give anyone a subprime mortgage who is willing to take it, irregardless of whether they can afford it or not, and then hand it over to Fannie to get back your money plus some. Easy money!
Speaking hypothetically:
If you asked me in 1999, when this business model became available, there is an 80% percent chance I would refuse on moral grounds. I would not willingly hand the taker (borrower) something that I know will ultimately financially ruin him for many years. Nor would I betray the trust of a crown (government) corporation so easily.
Fast forward to 2005-6, and you would find a different me. Witnessing unethical companies in my industry (again, role playing here) “making a killing” issuing subprime mortgages to anyone and everyone, the frenzy that then ensued by my peers to do the same, and all the housing market media hype, I would probably become delusional, and join the frenzy. The questions and rationalization that would predominate in my mind:
“How can it be wrong if everyone is doing it?”
“What difference does it make if I do it too?”
“Poor people won't think of getting these mortgages; they are not the one’s getting them, since the house prices are so high.”
“I can make an xxx amount of money in so little time. YAHHHOOOO! MORALS BE GONE! But I’m still good; I think….”
This time, there would be an 80% chance that I would be a participant in issuing subprime mortgages.
So, I’m going to have to answer yes to my own poll. Greed is that powerful. It is almost unintentional, and it certainly almost always oblivious. How do you avoid falling into this trap?
Last edited: